Once again Jags very deep in regression, a fade with my other system that is back to back weeks and a BF fade off a requalify on the BF which is basically the same thing, both methods have Jags a fade fade back to back.
The Bounce Factor ..........
Titans +3 (-130) over Saints --- .65 units
Bears +3.5 (-120) over 9ers --- .6 units
Both Saints and 9ers are fades playing on unsustainable levels.
5
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
Colts +6.5 (-128) over Jags --- 1.28 units
Colts +3.5 (-120) 1st half ---- .65 units
Once again Jags very deep in regression, a fade with my other system that is back to back weeks and a BF fade off a requalify on the BF which is basically the same thing, both methods have Jags a fade fade back to back.
The Bounce Factor ..........
Titans +3 (-130) over Saints --- .65 units
Bears +3.5 (-120) over 9ers --- .6 units
Both Saints and 9ers are fades playing on unsustainable levels.
I like everything but the Bears (cue Bears win). Maybe the 49ers' play is unsustainable, but the Bears' pulling wins out of the air is, as well. I am a Packer fan, and still mad about what has happened to our season, it's true. But I can't believe this Bears team is playing for a first-round bye.
1
I like everything but the Bears (cue Bears win). Maybe the 49ers' play is unsustainable, but the Bears' pulling wins out of the air is, as well. I am a Packer fan, and still mad about what has happened to our season, it's true. But I can't believe this Bears team is playing for a first-round bye.
I like everything but the Bears (cue Bears win). Maybe the 49ers' play is unsustainable, but the Bears' pulling wins out of the air is, as well. I am a Packer fan, and still mad about what has happened to our season, it's true. But I can't believe this Bears team is playing for a first-round bye.
Yea I agree, I don't particularly like backing the Bears but I have to follow the BF when it comes calling................
Another way to look at it is, the Bears great luck continues as they catch the 9ers in a BF spot.
How lucky can this Bears team continuing getting ?
0
Quote Originally Posted by garbagetime:
I like everything but the Bears (cue Bears win). Maybe the 49ers' play is unsustainable, but the Bears' pulling wins out of the air is, as well. I am a Packer fan, and still mad about what has happened to our season, it's true. But I can't believe this Bears team is playing for a first-round bye.
Yea I agree, I don't particularly like backing the Bears but I have to follow the BF when it comes calling................
Another way to look at it is, the Bears great luck continues as they catch the 9ers in a BF spot.
How lucky can this Bears team continuing getting ?
9ers off 5 straight wins , in the process they scored their most pts and 3rd most pts of the season the past 2 games.
And along with that they gained the most yards and 2cd most yards of the season in the past 2 games. Back to back 400 yard games when they only had 1 game all season over 400 yards.
Granted they had lots of injuries and may be much healthier now.
If we look at the 2 games prior to the past 2 games , 9ers gave up the lowest pts in any game and 2cd lowest pts in any game which would be by far their fewest pts given up in back to back games.
9ers stringing wins and covers together while playing their best ball, you buying 9ers at the top.
Of coarse same could be said about the Bears to some degree.
3
9ers off 5 straight wins , in the process they scored their most pts and 3rd most pts of the season the past 2 games.
And along with that they gained the most yards and 2cd most yards of the season in the past 2 games. Back to back 400 yard games when they only had 1 game all season over 400 yards.
Granted they had lots of injuries and may be much healthier now.
If we look at the 2 games prior to the past 2 games , 9ers gave up the lowest pts in any game and 2cd lowest pts in any game which would be by far their fewest pts given up in back to back games.
9ers stringing wins and covers together while playing their best ball, you buying 9ers at the top.
Of coarse same could be said about the Bears to some degree.
Rams have scored thier most pts, 3rd most and 4th most past 3 games. And by far the most pts scored over any 3 game stretch this season.
Then on top of this they gained 519 yards or more in those 3 straight games.
They had no game gaining over 500 yards prior and only 2 games over 450 yards withe the best being like 462.
I did see something on you tube last year about teams gaining over 900 yards back to back weeks then being a fav in a non division game which is not good ATS.
1
Rams have scored thier most pts, 3rd most and 4th most past 3 games. And by far the most pts scored over any 3 game stretch this season.
Then on top of this they gained 519 yards or more in those 3 straight games.
They had no game gaining over 500 yards prior and only 2 games over 450 yards withe the best being like 462.
I did see something on you tube last year about teams gaining over 900 yards back to back weeks then being a fav in a non division game which is not good ATS.
Quote Originally Posted by bubbleup: Can't stand T Lawrence, yet he gets lucky as shxt this year. Yea he has like 88 QBPasser Rating which is below ave. I think Jags might be doing well winning the TO battle, getting a bit lucky....................
I think Liam Coen has been a difference maker for Lawrence, who's having his best season. Baker Mayfield was phenomenal with Coen as his OC last year, and look where the Bucs are this year.
Ben Johnson is another difference maker, and all you have to do is look at the fortunes of the Lions and Bears this year compared to last year. As far as the Bears go, they've had a lot go their way this season, but they're also a confident bunch that's getting better by the week. They also have two extra days prep time for SF, which is on a short week.
As I type this I'm seeing that multiple Chicago players are questionable with an illness. Not sure who's in and who's out.
0
Quote Originally Posted by theclaw:
Quote Originally Posted by bubbleup: Can't stand T Lawrence, yet he gets lucky as shxt this year. Yea he has like 88 QBPasser Rating which is below ave. I think Jags might be doing well winning the TO battle, getting a bit lucky....................
I think Liam Coen has been a difference maker for Lawrence, who's having his best season. Baker Mayfield was phenomenal with Coen as his OC last year, and look where the Bucs are this year.
Ben Johnson is another difference maker, and all you have to do is look at the fortunes of the Lions and Bears this year compared to last year. As far as the Bears go, they've had a lot go their way this season, but they're also a confident bunch that's getting better by the week. They also have two extra days prep time for SF, which is on a short week.
As I type this I'm seeing that multiple Chicago players are questionable with an illness. Not sure who's in and who's out.
well bro when you freakin fire your coach, you might not be frustrated...not one time did the Bears fail to show up this season..you guys did vs Cleveland, Carolina, Dallas, etc..you got an OC not a HC
0
@garbagetime
well bro when you freakin fire your coach, you might not be frustrated...not one time did the Bears fail to show up this season..you guys did vs Cleveland, Carolina, Dallas, etc..you got an OC not a HC
Quote Originally Posted by theclaw: Quote Originally Posted by bubbleup: Can't stand T Lawrence, yet he gets lucky as shxt this year. Yea he has like 88 QBPasser Rating which is below ave. I think Jags might be doing well winning the TO battle, getting a bit lucky.................... I think Liam Coen has been a difference maker for Lawrence, who's having his best season. Baker Mayfield was phenomenal with Coen as his OC last year, and look where the Bucs are this year. Ben Johnson is another difference maker, and all you have to do is look at the fortunes of the Lions and Bears this year compared to last year. As far as the Bears go, they've had a lot go their way this season, but they're also a confident bunch that's getting better by the week. They also have two extra days prep time for SF, which is on a short week. As I type this I'm seeing that multiple Chicago players are questionable with an illness. Not sure who's in and who's out.
Very true .........
0
Quote Originally Posted by Boisestateand8:
Quote Originally Posted by theclaw: Quote Originally Posted by bubbleup: Can't stand T Lawrence, yet he gets lucky as shxt this year. Yea he has like 88 QBPasser Rating which is below ave. I think Jags might be doing well winning the TO battle, getting a bit lucky.................... I think Liam Coen has been a difference maker for Lawrence, who's having his best season. Baker Mayfield was phenomenal with Coen as his OC last year, and look where the Bucs are this year. Ben Johnson is another difference maker, and all you have to do is look at the fortunes of the Lions and Bears this year compared to last year. As far as the Bears go, they've had a lot go their way this season, but they're also a confident bunch that's getting better by the week. They also have two extra days prep time for SF, which is on a short week. As I type this I'm seeing that multiple Chicago players are questionable with an illness. Not sure who's in and who's out.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.