A very balanced approach and mindset to this. This query is very strong but it’s on the Eagles.
AF and line>=-3 and n:line<-5 and n:F and day=Monday and week>3 The results are 14-0 ATS last 14 games and 18-4 ATS last 22 games.
The big favor here is the Eagles next line at over -10 to the Raiders. That’s a powerful line for a look ahead line of that many points.
That essentially means this game is very polrobanld to be a win because that line probably wouldn’t be as high. Especially if this potential loss would create a 3 game losing streak.
The problems within this:
Eagles previous season they played 4 playoff games. These teams are 1-1 ATS within this trend.
Chargers need the win but in the trend some other teams needing the win have failed as well
There are 22 available previous games so it’s difficult to narrow down any similar exact situations.
I think the bottom line to my thinking is the Chargers had a playoff year last year fail. They are struggling to find that same success rate. There is a strong possibility they miss the playoffs this year and another team finds it way in.
The dogs have done extremely well this week including the Chiefs last night.
I think Philly is the play and thus trend supports my thinking.
AF and line>=-3 and n:line<-5 and n:F and day=Monday and week>3
An away favorite on Monday when the line is from -1 to -3 and this away favorites next game line is higher than -5 the game being played is after:
week 3=18-4 ATS
week 8=14-0 ATS
Eagles and the favorite because already so many dogs this week.
Nothing is ever in the bank until it is in the bank
0
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
A very balanced approach and mindset to this. This query is very strong but it’s on the Eagles.
AF and line>=-3 and n:line<-5 and n:F and day=Monday and week>3 The results are 14-0 ATS last 14 games and 18-4 ATS last 22 games.
The big favor here is the Eagles next line at over -10 to the Raiders. That’s a powerful line for a look ahead line of that many points.
That essentially means this game is very polrobanld to be a win because that line probably wouldn’t be as high. Especially if this potential loss would create a 3 game losing streak.
The problems within this:
Eagles previous season they played 4 playoff games. These teams are 1-1 ATS within this trend.
Chargers need the win but in the trend some other teams needing the win have failed as well
There are 22 available previous games so it’s difficult to narrow down any similar exact situations.
I think the bottom line to my thinking is the Chargers had a playoff year last year fail. They are struggling to find that same success rate. There is a strong possibility they miss the playoffs this year and another team finds it way in.
The dogs have done extremely well this week including the Chiefs last night.
I think Philly is the play and thus trend supports my thinking.
AF and line>=-3 and n:line<-5 and n:F and day=Monday and week>3
An away favorite on Monday when the line is from -1 to -3 and this away favorites next game line is higher than -5 the game being played is after:
week 3=18-4 ATS
week 8=14-0 ATS
Eagles and the favorite because already so many dogs this week.
@SportsIntuition Good trend but I don’t do team trends especially when the trend is this short and consistent. I could dig into this and find other examplease of Philly success as well.
Sometimes team trends are even more significant, especially when they include recent years with current players and coaches, because it shows how they actually respond in certain situations.
A trend that dates back beyond a certain time period becomes irrelevant, no matter how successful, because it involves different players, coaches and even different game rules.
The trend you shared is a perfect example; this trend was only 3-2 since 2022 (3-3 after last night), the most relevant and significant time period for current players/coaches, suggesting they don't respond as well as previous players/coaches.
All trends are relevant at some level, but the real art is in interpreting the data, and this is what makes using tools like SDQL exciting.
0
Quote Originally Posted by spottie2935:
@SportsIntuition Good trend but I don’t do team trends especially when the trend is this short and consistent. I could dig into this and find other examplease of Philly success as well.
Sometimes team trends are even more significant, especially when they include recent years with current players and coaches, because it shows how they actually respond in certain situations.
A trend that dates back beyond a certain time period becomes irrelevant, no matter how successful, because it involves different players, coaches and even different game rules.
The trend you shared is a perfect example; this trend was only 3-2 since 2022 (3-3 after last night), the most relevant and significant time period for current players/coaches, suggesting they don't respond as well as previous players/coaches.
All trends are relevant at some level, but the real art is in interpreting the data, and this is what makes using tools like SDQL exciting.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.
Hot Forum Topics
