Posted:
#26
https://www.dailynorseman.com/2015/10/12/9513739/minnesota-vikings-look-to-avoid-the-post-bye-blues
0
I jusst hit the Cheifs spread and ML vs the vikes for 4 grand
Posted:
#34
Quote Originally Posted by NinjaNight:
Lol of all the teams and times to back them with a big bet you chose this one. The Chiefs were deflated after Charles was lost and Reid's play calling is hardly the stuff to inspire confidence.
Lol of all the teams and times to back them with a big bet you chose this one. The Chiefs were deflated after Charles was lost and Reid's play calling is hardly the stuff to inspire confidence.
GL you may still get the win but this is dangerous
I like the reward for the riskI have not jumped off the wagon on the chiefs...one win is all it takes....last week was brutal way to lose....i bet they will respond in a big way
win this game and they win the next two
i mean 3 of their losses came to Undefeated teams
0
Posted:
#38
Public perception is I am stupid
What an idiot
betting on the chiefs
minny rolls
I believe kansas city played 3 very diffucult games close despit injuries and had an emotional letdown when charles went out
I am betting on any reid and steady checkdown alex..winds up to 19 mph this weekend....minny kicker is not good and personally checkdown throws to kelce and west and maclin to the bank
dat is fast a fuhk
The bet is made now I will enjoy and hopefully win
0
Posted:
#42
Quote Originally Posted by Water_Boy:
What is considered a dumb bet anyway. My system has KC to cover the spread as well. I don't second guess my picks. I just play them even if they look bad. For example my plays also have the Chargers to cover against Green Bay, so I play it, even tho my gut says different.
Good luck BL.
What is considered a dumb bet anyway. My system has KC to cover the spread as well. I don't second guess my picks. I just play them even if they look bad. For example my plays also have the Chargers to cover against Green Bay, so I play it, even tho my gut says different.
Good luck BL.
I liked the bet....i do not think it is dumb ta all..Seems like others think it is dumb
0
Posted:
#43
Well, I do agree it looks too easy, however I can't think of any reason to back the Chiefs. Any QB can dink and dunk, but the good ones can find receivers downfield. Not Alex.I usually bet against the "must win" theory unless it's one of those 0-2 situations. The Chiefs were outgained by a poor Bears team. However the NFL loves parity and this may be one of those games.
0
Posted:
#44
Quote Originally Posted by richamp:
Well, I do agree it looks too easy, however I can't think of any reason to back the Chiefs. Any QB can dink and dunk, but the good ones can find receivers downfield. Not Alex.I usually bet against the "must win" theory unless it's one of those 0-2 situations. The Chiefs were outgained by a poor Bears team. However the NFL loves parity and this may be one of those games.
Well, I do agree it looks too easy, however I can't think of any reason to back the Chiefs. Any QB can dink and dunk, but the good ones can find receivers downfield. Not Alex.I usually bet against the "must win" theory unless it's one of those 0-2 situations. The Chiefs were outgained by a poor Bears team. However the NFL loves parity and this may be one of those games.
If they indeed are bad I will lose
I believe the real chiefs will come out here
the one that had expectations to be great
0
Posted:
#45
The only thing I like is the contrarian view. Vikes are tough at home. AP is a beast at home. Their defense is stout and KC has no run game. This game for KC falls on A. Smith, good luck with that one. The line makes sense as it reflects Minnehaha only half point better than KC. Add 3 puts for home field advantage and your at the line. Why does it look so good? Quite frankly I am on the other side. Good luck. Also, you mentioned KC losing to quality teams and yes they have but don't forget they lost to the lowly Bears!!
0
Hot Forum Topics
