Ive never played that other game but baccarat I have agree that game has patterns and they can run but usually it’s the same shoe then the pattern changes there are multiple patterns I used to go with the run others bet against it 1 time it hit 18 straight bankers or player it was late 90 s can’t remember which but I won huge well huge for me and that was at the Hilton of Las Vegas love baccarat
0
@DJK
Ive never played that other game but baccarat I have agree that game has patterns and they can run but usually it’s the same shoe then the pattern changes there are multiple patterns I used to go with the run others bet against it 1 time it hit 18 straight bankers or player it was late 90 s can’t remember which but I won huge well huge for me and that was at the Hilton of Las Vegas love baccarat
Quote Originally Posted by C-70Blues: Quote Originally Posted by DJK: Brandon Lang is a loud mouth tout who NEVER wins and he is the biggest FADE material on the internet. He has NEVER had a winning season in whatever number of years he's been touting and selling his picks on NFL. Except this past December and January, he's in a plus territory for the first time ever and he actually has a winning record in the NFL playoffs for the first time ever too. He picked Seattle, so at first I thought I was in trouble with my Seattle moneyline bet, but then I realized that he is actually winning and for once he could be right. It could mean nothing, but for someone like him who almost always loses and then all of sudden he's winning tells me I just may be safe. When you're using Brandon Lang as a reason to place your bet... What did you do, fail elementary school English? Where do you see that I made my bet based on Lang's pick? You should read again what I said.
So Brandon Lang absolutely sucks but since he's posted a few winners and agrees with YOU, he must be on the right side. I do enjoy people's rationale backing their wager.
Self-reliance is more important than artificial intelligence.
1
Quote Originally Posted by DJK:
Quote Originally Posted by C-70Blues: Quote Originally Posted by DJK: Brandon Lang is a loud mouth tout who NEVER wins and he is the biggest FADE material on the internet. He has NEVER had a winning season in whatever number of years he's been touting and selling his picks on NFL. Except this past December and January, he's in a plus territory for the first time ever and he actually has a winning record in the NFL playoffs for the first time ever too. He picked Seattle, so at first I thought I was in trouble with my Seattle moneyline bet, but then I realized that he is actually winning and for once he could be right. It could mean nothing, but for someone like him who almost always loses and then all of sudden he's winning tells me I just may be safe. When you're using Brandon Lang as a reason to place your bet... What did you do, fail elementary school English? Where do you see that I made my bet based on Lang's pick? You should read again what I said.
So Brandon Lang absolutely sucks but since he's posted a few winners and agrees with YOU, he must be on the right side. I do enjoy people's rationale backing their wager.
I have seen far more one sided than this one. The most one sided Super Bowl with picks along with money was when everyone was picking Denver over the Seahawks in 2013 and I new Seattle was going to cover and they did.
The 2nd worst one was in 2016 when everyone was on Carolina over Denver and I had Denver and Denver won and covered.
So both of those from an actual money standpoint were far more one sided than this one is.
There are definitely a lot of people picking Seattle to win though in the media.
Here is a relevant stat for every one though.
The line on this game is -4.5 to -5 every where and there have been 5 other times when the books had the line close at -4.5 or -5 on Super Bowls.
All 5 of them have happened since 2010 , so relevant to this time, not any that are ancient history:
All 5 of those games the underdog covered and 4 of the 5 the underdog won outright.
Those 5 games are these:
02/07/2010 Indianapolis -4.5 vs New Orleans New Orleans won 31-17
02/03/2013 San Francisco -4.5 vs Baltimore Baltimore won 34-31
02/06/2016 Carolina -5 vs Denver Denver won 24-10
02/04/2018 New England -4.5 vs Philadelphia Philadelphia won 41-33
02/13/2022 Los Angeles Rams -4.5 vs Cincinnati Los Angeles won 23-20
So between that and a show where I saw 18 of 19 Sports media members pick Seattle to win, I am taking the Pats +5.
Good luck!
3
@DefenseWinsSB
I have seen far more one sided than this one. The most one sided Super Bowl with picks along with money was when everyone was picking Denver over the Seahawks in 2013 and I new Seattle was going to cover and they did.
The 2nd worst one was in 2016 when everyone was on Carolina over Denver and I had Denver and Denver won and covered.
So both of those from an actual money standpoint were far more one sided than this one is.
There are definitely a lot of people picking Seattle to win though in the media.
Here is a relevant stat for every one though.
The line on this game is -4.5 to -5 every where and there have been 5 other times when the books had the line close at -4.5 or -5 on Super Bowls.
All 5 of them have happened since 2010 , so relevant to this time, not any that are ancient history:
All 5 of those games the underdog covered and 4 of the 5 the underdog won outright.
Those 5 games are these:
02/07/2010 Indianapolis -4.5 vs New Orleans New Orleans won 31-17
02/03/2013 San Francisco -4.5 vs Baltimore Baltimore won 34-31
02/06/2016 Carolina -5 vs Denver Denver won 24-10
02/04/2018 New England -4.5 vs Philadelphia Philadelphia won 41-33
02/13/2022 Los Angeles Rams -4.5 vs Cincinnati Los Angeles won 23-20
So between that and a show where I saw 18 of 19 Sports media members pick Seattle to win, I am taking the Pats +5.
Who would waste time to post ‘bad thread’. That would be unkind for no reason, kind of like your post here. So, of course, folks are going to post ‘good thread’ in the ones they like.
0
Who would waste time to post ‘bad thread’. That would be unkind for no reason, kind of like your post here. So, of course, folks are going to post ‘good thread’ in the ones they like.
Hey Silly how about you taking your five posts and silly ass remarks off of this site since you are nothing but a piece of shit with no value, no substance, no related matter and for being most importantly a no brainer clown.
When I win Money it's my money and NOT house money
1
@SillyDumbJesus
Hey Silly how about you taking your five posts and silly ass remarks off of this site since you are nothing but a piece of shit with no value, no substance, no related matter and for being most importantly a no brainer clown.
@DefenseWinsSB I have seen far more one sided than this one. The most one sided Super Bowl with picks along with money was when everyone was picking Denver over the Seahawks in 2013 and I knew Seattle was going to cover and they did. The 2nd worst one was in 2016 when everyone was on Carolina over Denver and I had Denver and Denver won and covered. So both of those from an actual money standpoint were far more one sided than this one is. There are definitely a lot of people picking Seattle to win though in the media. Here is a relevant stat for every one though. The line on this game is -4.5 to -5 every where and there have been 5 other times when the books had the line close at -4.5 or -5 on Super Bowls. All 5 of them have happened since 2010 , so relevant to this time, not any that are ancient history: All 5 of those games the underdog covered and 4 of the 5 the underdog won outright. Those 5 games are these: 02/07/2010Indianapolis -4.5 vs New OrleansNew Orleans won 31-17 02/03/2013San Francisco -4.5 vs BaltimoreBaltimore won 34-31 02/06/2016Carolina -5 vs DenverDenver won 24-10 02/04/2018New England -4.5 vs PhiladelphiaPhiladelphia won 41-33 02/13/2022Los Angeles Rams -4.5 vs CincinnatiLos Angeles won 23-20 So between that and a show where I saw 18 of 19 Sports media members pick Seattle to win, I am taking the Pats +5. Good luck!
good luck my brother! I’m on the moneyline LFG!
0
Quote Originally Posted by emeraldsports:
@DefenseWinsSB I have seen far more one sided than this one. The most one sided Super Bowl with picks along with money was when everyone was picking Denver over the Seahawks in 2013 and I knew Seattle was going to cover and they did. The 2nd worst one was in 2016 when everyone was on Carolina over Denver and I had Denver and Denver won and covered. So both of those from an actual money standpoint were far more one sided than this one is. There are definitely a lot of people picking Seattle to win though in the media. Here is a relevant stat for every one though. The line on this game is -4.5 to -5 every where and there have been 5 other times when the books had the line close at -4.5 or -5 on Super Bowls. All 5 of them have happened since 2010 , so relevant to this time, not any that are ancient history: All 5 of those games the underdog covered and 4 of the 5 the underdog won outright. Those 5 games are these: 02/07/2010Indianapolis -4.5 vs New OrleansNew Orleans won 31-17 02/03/2013San Francisco -4.5 vs BaltimoreBaltimore won 34-31 02/06/2016Carolina -5 vs DenverDenver won 24-10 02/04/2018New England -4.5 vs PhiladelphiaPhiladelphia won 41-33 02/13/2022Los Angeles Rams -4.5 vs CincinnatiLos Angeles won 23-20 So between that and a show where I saw 18 of 19 Sports media members pick Seattle to win, I am taking the Pats +5. Good luck!
Seattle has not won a Super Bowl while wearing dark blue uniforms. The Seahawks have appeared in three Super Bowls, and in both instances where they wore their primary dark jerseys (Super Bowl XL and Super Bowl XLIX), they lost. In Super Bowl XL, they wore the older "Seahawks Blue," and in Super Bowl XLIX, they donned navy blue. Their only Super Bowl victory came in Super Bowl XLVIII, where they wore their white uniforms.
0
Seattle has not won a Super Bowl while wearing dark blue uniforms. The Seahawks have appeared in three Super Bowls, and in both instances where they wore their primary dark jerseys (Super Bowl XL and Super Bowl XLIX), they lost. In Super Bowl XL, they wore the older "Seahawks Blue," and in Super Bowl XLIX, they donned navy blue. Their only Super Bowl victory came in Super Bowl XLVIII, where they wore their white uniforms.
Don Juan on pace to have possibly 10,000 views on his thread before Superbowl Sunday kickoff. To say Seattle Seahawks-4.5 birds are cooked WELL DONE would be an understatement. Patriots+4.5 for as large as you can possibly afford to UNLOAD!!
0
Don Juan on pace to have possibly 10,000 views on his thread before Superbowl Sunday kickoff. To say Seattle Seahawks-4.5 birds are cooked WELL DONE would be an understatement. Patriots+4.5 for as large as you can possibly afford to UNLOAD!!
Don Juan on pace to have possibly 10,000 views on his thread before Superbowl Sunday kickoff. To say Seattle Seahawks-4.5 birds are cooked WELL DONE would be an understatement. Patriots+4.5 for as large as you can possibly afford to UNLOAD!!
There's someone who talks like you on another forum.
From what I can tell, he almost always loses.
Maybe you are him? LMAO
1
Quote Originally Posted by ThePizzaman0:
Don Juan on pace to have possibly 10,000 views on his thread before Superbowl Sunday kickoff. To say Seattle Seahawks-4.5 birds are cooked WELL DONE would be an understatement. Patriots+4.5 for as large as you can possibly afford to UNLOAD!!
There's someone who talks like you on another forum.
Quote Originally Posted by DJK: Quote Originally Posted by C-70Blues: Quote Originally Posted by DJK: Brandon Lang is a loud mouth tout who NEVER wins and he is the biggest FADE material on the internet. He has NEVER had a winning season in whatever number of years he's been touting and selling his picks on NFL. Except this past December and January, he's in a plus territory for the first time ever and he actually has a winning record in the NFL playoffs for the first time ever too. He picked Seattle, so at first I thought I was in trouble with my Seattle moneyline bet, but then I realized that he is actually winning and for once he could be right. It could mean nothing, but for someone like him who almost always loses and then all of sudden he's winning tells me I just may be safe. When you're using Brandon Lang as a reason to place your bet... What did you do, fail elementary school English? Where do you see that I made my bet based on Lang's pick? You should read again what I said. So Brandon Lang absolutely sucks but since he's posted a few winners and agrees with YOU, he must be on the right side. I do enjoy people's rationale backing their wager.
Obviously, you don't get or understand what I said.
The life is all about streaks.
I'm a baccarat player among other things and I do my best to not bet against any type of trends or streaks.
Lang is a horrible tout who never wins and yet here he is having a decent winning streak in this year's playoffs for the first time ever.
Do you really want to go against someone who's winning? He made his pick after I already made my bet, so I couldn't careless what he picked but it's more likely that he could be right considering his current winning streak.
Are you on a winning streak in the playoffs?
I am as I haven't lost yet in the playoffs and up well over $30K spot betting.
I already said Vanjack is on fire and he picked Seattle. I am not crazy enough to go gainst what he picked, but I made my bet as soon as the Super Bowl odd came out and that's before he made his pick. I just hoped that Vanjack picked Seattle and he did.
I have no clue who's going to win or cover.
I only care for Seattle to win only which then I'm going to double my money. If they lose, then I'm back to even for the playoffs and I'm okay with that.
1
Quote Originally Posted by C-70Blues:
Quote Originally Posted by DJK: Quote Originally Posted by C-70Blues: Quote Originally Posted by DJK: Brandon Lang is a loud mouth tout who NEVER wins and he is the biggest FADE material on the internet. He has NEVER had a winning season in whatever number of years he's been touting and selling his picks on NFL. Except this past December and January, he's in a plus territory for the first time ever and he actually has a winning record in the NFL playoffs for the first time ever too. He picked Seattle, so at first I thought I was in trouble with my Seattle moneyline bet, but then I realized that he is actually winning and for once he could be right. It could mean nothing, but for someone like him who almost always loses and then all of sudden he's winning tells me I just may be safe. When you're using Brandon Lang as a reason to place your bet... What did you do, fail elementary school English? Where do you see that I made my bet based on Lang's pick? You should read again what I said. So Brandon Lang absolutely sucks but since he's posted a few winners and agrees with YOU, he must be on the right side. I do enjoy people's rationale backing their wager.
Obviously, you don't get or understand what I said.
The life is all about streaks.
I'm a baccarat player among other things and I do my best to not bet against any type of trends or streaks.
Lang is a horrible tout who never wins and yet here he is having a decent winning streak in this year's playoffs for the first time ever.
Do you really want to go against someone who's winning? He made his pick after I already made my bet, so I couldn't careless what he picked but it's more likely that he could be right considering his current winning streak.
Are you on a winning streak in the playoffs?
I am as I haven't lost yet in the playoffs and up well over $30K spot betting.
I already said Vanjack is on fire and he picked Seattle. I am not crazy enough to go gainst what he picked, but I made my bet as soon as the Super Bowl odd came out and that's before he made his pick. I just hoped that Vanjack picked Seattle and he did.
I have no clue who's going to win or cover.
I only care for Seattle to win only which then I'm going to double my money. If they lose, then I'm back to even for the playoffs and I'm okay with that.
Last week I hired a consulting firm here in Las Vegas and paid them $10,000 to get to the bottom of WHO everyone is picking in Super Bowl 60. This morning, a full three days before the game, they provided me with their final report. Here it is... Everyone is picking the Seahawks to win and cover except for everyone who is picking the Patriots to win and cover.
That's what I tell the bosses at work...All the customers love me, except the ones that don't.
Cautiously pessimistic
0
Quote Originally Posted by MrBator:
Last week I hired a consulting firm here in Las Vegas and paid them $10,000 to get to the bottom of WHO everyone is picking in Super Bowl 60. This morning, a full three days before the game, they provided me with their final report. Here it is... Everyone is picking the Seahawks to win and cover except for everyone who is picking the Patriots to win and cover.
That's what I tell the bosses at work...All the customers love me, except the ones that don't.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.