I have never seen such a one sided Super Bowl from media, fans, athletes

This has been almost unbelievable that the media, fans, and athletes alike think the Patriots are going to get smoked. Not only best but beaten to a pulp. I watched “Dudes on Dudes” the Edelman and Gronk podcast and even they are sounding like they think Seattle. This is a perfect situation where I think Patriots will win this game and to bet the contrarian way! Everywhere you turn from Nick Wright, Jon Gruden, Patriots players and fans alike are picking the Seahawks. Gentleman you have carried me through many problems on this site and I owe you one! I have a great feeling if you bet Patriots moneyline your going to be a very happy person. 

     AMEN!! Public loses their A$$ on Sunday. PATS are soaking up and in all this disrespect and will be 10-0 on the road to finish up their magical year even if they are considered the "Home Team", which we know is NOT the case. 

Gruden is right 

Seahawks win this 

Take Seattle to win the Battle 

Are you sure you got that sentence right? No matter how many times I read it, it doesn't sound right.

Last week I hired a consulting firm here in Las Vegas and paid them $10,000 to get to the bottom of WHO everyone is picking in Super Bowl 60. This morning, a full three days before the game, they provided me with their final report. Here it is...

Everyone is picking the Seahawks to win and cover except for everyone who is picking the Patriots to win and cover.

@DefenseWinsSB      Exactly, perfectly said and the powers to be and puppet masters will be pulling their strings. Last year was a blowout and so I feel this one is going to be like PATS vs SEA in 2015 or like RAMS vs CIN a few yrs ago. It is coming down to the end and IIIIIIIF SEA wins, well they certainly will NOT be covering the -4.5.

Everywhere I look on you tube everyone is on the Pats. Lots of talk how the dogs have covered at a high rate in past years .

I don't remember all this talk last year. I will try to look into it because why are they talking this info this year but not last year ?

Too much talk on those dogs, it is not that easy. Many of those dogs should have been favorites according to my PR'S and some not by a small amount.

Going into last years SB do you really believe Eagles should be the dog ? No possibility, Eagles were playing far better then KC in regular season and playoffs.

My defense adjusted PR I I use for SB has a small lean on Seahawk but was on many of those dogs, not this year.

I guess you are too young to remember the 2001 Patriots when they were double digit dogs to the Rams. EVERYONE with a microphone or tv camera was on the Rams.

 #6 @MrBator 

 Everyone is picking the Seahawks to win and cover except for everyone who is picking the Patriots to win and cover. 

pats should be -3.5 only 

At -4.5 and if climbing by kick off time, that is given the Pat ML backers the mother load of the jackpot with that nice plus odds. 

+4.5 is screaming a backdoor cover for a 1 possession game. Pats fans are not and should not take the points.  You want your team to win on the ML don't you? 

I'm with old man Don.  I have no feelings on this game and I'm letting someone else to bring the money to me instead.  I'll be in Reno for the superbowl and all my friends are on the pats.  I too will "pretend" to root for the pats so I don't feel alienated but the bets and them tickets I have in my pockets will have giggling inside.  I like money first. Ha 

Brandon Lang is a loud mouth tout who NEVER wins and he is the biggest FADE material on the internet.

He has NEVER had a winning season in whatever number of years he's been touting and selling his picks on NFL.

Except this past December and January, he's in a plus territory for the first time ever and he actually has a winning record in the NFL playoffs for the first time ever too.

He picked Seattle, so at first I thought I was in trouble with my Seattle moneyline bet, but then I realized that he is actually winning and for once he could be right.  It could mean nothing, but for someone like him who almost always loses and then all of sudden he's winning tells me I just may be safe.

When you're using Brandon Lang as a reason to place your bet...

As always love all you guys man I’ve had many down moments and embarrassing ones but I love coming in here and chatting with all of you so thank you for this outlet even the ones like @Cooler999 lol thanks guys love u all man!

@ThePizzaman0

@C-70Blues

@DJK

@nfl_brosuf

@Macwestie1

@C-70Blues

@theclaw

@PNbeinganSN

@MrBator

@Cooler999

@hoopsvader

What did you do, fail elementary school English?

Where do you see that I made my bet based on Lang's pick?

You should read again what I said.

You should look at yourself in a mirror.

Ever think that you are the public?  LMAO

I saw the team that is the better seed is 2-17-2 the last 28 they said the other 7 where the same seed I believe that 2-17-2 but not sure about the same seed just info i saw 

I don't know where you saw that but I'm sure that's not accurate.

Honestly, New England could be the higher seed since they have the better record.

This is the year when all sorts of trends break, so if Seattle is the first seed then maybe they will win; don't know about the cover though.

Indiana was the first seed in CFP and they won but they didn't cover.

I had Indiana on the moneyline with two other NFL moneylines and I won low 5 figures.  It was one of the easiest moneyline parlays I had watching the games.  I can't stand having to sweat the games.  Hopefully, I won't have to sweat the Seattle moneyline bet.

Just now I played Pai Gow Tiles at Hard Rock casino in AC for 3 hours and the guy I was playing with is something else.

He lost first $1,000 buy in, so he bought in another $500 and he built that up to $7,000+ in a matter of 1/2 hour being up over $5,500.  So, I asked him what's the most he has won this year and he tells me $40,000+ at Rivers playing the Tiles game. He said he was down to his last $70 from $2,000 buy-in and he built that up to $40,000+.  Prior to that, he said he won $100,000+ playing baccarat at Foxwood in 2 hours but only ONE SHOE.  He said the whole shoe was a repeating pattern of 5 bankers and 1 player for almost the whole shoe and all he did was follow the trend with $3,000+ bets.  This guy is all over the place and he lives not too far from where I live which is near PARX casino in PA.  The way he bets, there's no doubt that he will win huge as he was shoving anywhere from $1,000 to $2,000 a hand when he's winning.

I had my chance to win huge too as I was down $1,500, which then I bet $1,600 which I won and then I won 5 more in a row.

I let it ride, then I could have won almost $30K in about 5 minutes, but I'm not as brave as he is.  I wish I was but I'm just not even though I have the bankroll to do what he was doing.

Knowing when to shove is a skill I could never master even after playing casino games for over 40 years.  Maybe some day before I'm dead.