Let's go Pack has issues. You brought up the fact they only give up 19 a game. When you cap a game, you have to dive a little deeper.
You probably think the Pack's D is better than the 85 Bears. Such a homer!
Why??
You said GB couldnt stop anybody. I simply stated at home they allow 19 ppg.
I dont think that is an accurate statement.....betting the favorite doesnt mean you are square.
Betting the obvious makes you a square, and from every thread on this site, NY seems like the obvious play.
Eli is a fucking GAMER! You guys are blind. Your giving one of the best passing attacks in the game right now 8 points against a horrible secondary. Sorry guys but Eli will keep these guys in this game and they will have a chance to win it. Green Bay should take care of business and pull out a victory, but you guys sound kinda dumb going against the momentum of the healthy G-Men getting 8 points in the playoffs.
Seriously are you fucking kidding me though! 8 fucking points your giving me more than a td to start. hahahahah Giants might even be the better team right now, laugh all you want.
Welcome aboard, BC 82! 
What do you see the big difference between that NFC Championship game and this Saturday's matchup? Eli Manning is pretty capable of going to Lambeau and beat Packs again, he proved it 4 years ago by beating Favre. Thanks!
And good luck to Packers as well as Brewers this season, will you guys keep Prince Fielder?
The last 3 weeks the Giants have had gift lines and the public has gobbled it up so I really don't think that argument is legitimate here.
However, this week there are football reasons as to why the Giants are going to have a rough time next week. They finally play a good team, finally. Not the fiddly-toes Matt Ryan and "zero confidence in his defense" Mike Smith, not Mark Blowchez and a "individual stat padding team" and not the wimpy Cowboys and a gunshy "Garrett."
They go up against the Pack. While the Pack are 1st, I'm not hearing a lot of love for the Pack. I'm hearing all the love in the world for the Saints and for the Giants and how it's gonna be like 2007 all over again.
The Packers are taking this personally. The Giants have no secondary to contain Rodgers and he's good at getting the ball out early to avoid the pass rush and he's played the Giants once already so he'll be more prepared.
On D everyone is dumping on the Packers. They will be out to prove something and while they give up a lot of yards, they get timely turnovers. The Giants can't expose the Pack main weakness in run D IMO (they had trouble running in the first 2.5 quarters when the Falcons D hadn't given up). I think Eli will be in a scoring race with Rodgers and Woodson or Tramon will make some key turnovers similar to the Lions-Saints game to cover the spread.
A 9-point spread to Rodgers is like a 6 point spread to other teams. Also the Pack were -6 in NY, and now they're -9 not -12. Sounds like value.
These are some early thoughts without thinking too much about the game.
That is the most ridiculous statement I have ever read.
Established in 1995,
, healthy team back, most turnovers, and well prepared team, Pack wanted home field for a reason....-9, jump on it while you can!
They're going to have their hands full with the that beast D-Line healthy. Great value in the Giants ML in a game where I think the Giants will control the clock with their all of a sudden found run game and Eli playing the best he ever has. 
Hot Forum Topics
