Posted:
#101
I remember when Greenbay was +130 to win it, darn should have grabbed that
GB in 1st place after this week....
Posted:
#103
I still think they win 10. Sorry to say the Packers just don't look that great this year. Toss up between them and the Bears next week, and I think the Vikes probably beat them at the dome if Harvin plays. As far as the Bears schedule, Arizona looks like a win, and the 2 games against GB and Det are basically toss ups to me. We will see. I'll stick to my guns with the 10 win prediction. 
Posted:
#104
The Packers don't look great this year? What are you smoking? Did you hear McCarthy yesterday before the game? They aren't worried about stats like they were in their 15-1 season. They're running the ball often and producing, taking a lot of weight of Rodgers. Green Bay can put up 35+ points on any team they want, they just don't want Rodgers throwing that much. For example, Houston..........
Posted:
#107
Quote Originally Posted by JMC1984:
I still think they win 10. Sorry to say the Packers just don't look that great this year. Toss up between them and the Bears next week, and I think the Vikes probably beat them at the dome if Harvin plays. As far as the Bears schedule, Arizona looks like a win, and the 2 games against GB and Det are basically toss ups to me. We will see. I'll stick to my guns with the 10 win prediction.
I still think they win 10. Sorry to say the Packers just don't look that great this year. Toss up between them and the Bears next week, and I think the Vikes probably beat them at the dome if Harvin plays. As far as the Bears schedule, Arizona looks like a win, and the 2 games against GB and Det are basically toss ups to me. We will see. I'll stick to my guns with the 10 win prediction.
You obviously know nothing about the Bears or Packers
Look at your posts on the 1st page of this thread....wondering who could possibly beat this great Bears team???? Everybody is now
Det would have beat them the 1st game, even with turning the ball over 6 times, 4 times inside the 25 they lost by 1 poss....
Bears are terrible on the road, Cutler is terrible on the road, Cutler is terrible in domes...
As for the Zona game, Bears will be 8-7, so who knows if they will even show up.....
And, for GB losing to Minn 
COME ON MAN....GB plays better in domes 
Posted:
#108
Quote Originally Posted by heyyomikey07:
The Packers don't look great this year? What are you smoking? Did you hear McCarthy yesterday before the game? They aren't worried about stats like they were in their 15-1 season. They're running the ball often and producing, taking a lot of weight of Rodgers. Green Bay can put up 35+ points on any team they want, they just don't want Rodgers throwing that much. For example, Houston..........
Be careful siding with me....Im a hated guy on here
Just because I provided stats for my threads and people dont agree with them, people dislike me.....
Then, they are "tough guys" who come out the few weeks GB lose, and bump threads from 11 months ago
Yet, nobody admits the fact, I was correct ABOUT EVERYTHING this thread stats
As for people claiming the Packers are down this year. Its so funny how people only look at stats to decide how a team is.
Like you said, they have been limited on defense all year, and because of that they have pulled back the offense. But, people refuse to understand that.
Just because GB isnt scoring 40+ a game, the offense must stink this year
They are trying to run, to help the defense....Either way it doesnt matter, everybody is coming back and they are making the playoff run again like they did 2 years ago
The offense shows up when it has to, and does it what is to do to win....They arent trying to light up the scoreboard anymore
Posted:
#109
Exactly. The ONLY reason why we are averaging 25pts a game is because we want to rest our defense. Of course, you want to know your team can go down the field and score any time, but the defense can't play 35+min a game.
He absolutely knows nothing about CHI, MIN, DET, or GB.....I'm a die hard GB fan and actually have been doing very well betting NFC North games.
Posted:
#110
You 2 should get a room. Only thing I ever said on the 1st page is the Bears will win 10 games, and I'm sticking to it. As far as the Packers being so great this year? They're squeaking games out against shitty teams, they got pasted by the Giants. Only really good win was against the Texans. Just face facts. This Packers team is just not as good as the previous 2 years. Only way they get to the SB is if they don't have to face the Giants or 49ers.
Posted:
#111
Oh, and they're not putting up 35 points a game on purpose? One of the dumbest things I've ever heard. Guess they didn't wanna over do it during the Giants game. And that Lions game they squeaked out in Detroit. Didn't wanna put too many points up I guess. Good stuff there. Gave me a good laugh.
One of the dumbest things I've ever heard. Guess they didn't wanna over do it during the Giants game. And that Lions game they squeaked out in Detroit. Didn't wanna put too many points up I guess. Good stuff there. Gave me a good laugh.
Posted:
#113
Quote Originally Posted by JMC1984:
You 2 should get a room. Only thing I ever said on the 1st page is the Bears will win 10 games, and I'm sticking to it. As far as the Packers being so great this year? They're squeaking games out against shitty teams, they got pasted by the Giants. Only really good win was against the Texans. Just face facts. This Packers team is just not as good as the previous 2 years. Only way they get to the SB is if they don't have to face the Giants or 49ers.
You 2 should get a room. Only thing I ever said on the 1st page is the Bears will win 10 games, and I'm sticking to it. As far as the Packers being so great this year? They're squeaking games out against shitty teams, they got pasted by the Giants. Only really good win was against the Texans. Just face facts. This Packers team is just not as good as the previous 2 years. Only way they get to the SB is if they don't have to face the Giants or 49ers.
You are correct. They got pasted by NY
But, you also have no clue that the game meant NOTHING to GB
After the win in Det, GB did all it had to do to win the division
GB seemed really interested in that game huh???
4th and 2 from the 38 and they kick a fg 4th and an inch from the 10 and they kick a field goal
That game meant nothing for GB
Going to be impossible to make it to the superbowl without playing SF on NY, so I guess we will find out again
And yes, GB is scoring less to help their defense....not sure what is hard to understand about that
Posted:
#115
Quote Originally Posted by JMC1984:
Yes, you're right. The mighty Packers cannot lose unless they aren't trying. Got it. And yes, they are limiting their scoring on purpose to help the D.
"Hey guys, darn this possession, let's just punt it and watch our D go to work!"
When did I make those statements???
The Packers tried against SF and lost, they tried against Sea and lost(were robbed) and they tried against Indy and lost and blew a lead.
Not sure where I ever said they only lose when they dont try.
If you watched that game, and think GB actually cared about winning that game, I feel sorry for your football knowledge
As for limiting their scoring on purpose to help the D...once again I dont get why that is so hard to understand????
Its not limiting their scoring, but its holding back. They led the league is scoring last year, but were last in D. Where did that get them??? Bounced
You cant only win with a great offense, you need a D.
If you have watched Gb the last two years, and watch them this year, they are a much different team. They hold back. If you cant see that Im sorry.
It has nothing to do with holding back to let their d go to work. Its to help them rest.
They are running the ball, short passes, long drives. Look at the last few games, kind of weird that when they needed to score to take to the lead, win the game, hold a lead, they always seem to get that score when they need it
Posted:
#121
Might be a very "homer" call, but doesnt mean I dont know what Im talking about
Thanks
Its funny...I made this thread, for a week nothing, then Gb lost 1 week and it got SLAMMED a week later ...Then they havent lost since and nobody can admit I was correct...
All the NY bashers were bumping and bumping, and now they are #9 and gone
Posted:
#123
All the haters, all the people with insults and attacks. All the Packers suck comments and Bears will beat them. All the bumping of 11 month old threads after a Packers loss. All the Giant fans talking trash on old threads weeks after I create the thread.
All those people are nowhere to be seen??? Gone, disppear, hiding
I create this thread weeks ago. Nobody in it. Then, 2 games after I create it, not even the week it was meant for, NY beats GB and here come all the TOUGH GUYS voicing their opinions. Then, POOF....two weeks after that they havent been back....Go figure 
Maybe people dont like how I go about thing, but atleast I dont run and hide when Im wrong
All those big talkers, big insults, personal attacks, persoanl judgments....and you all hide. Way to show your true colors
Like I said, Pack will win this game. They DOMINATED!!! Should have been a 17+ win. Like I said, Bears miss the playoffs and dont touch 10 wins
You all had plenty to say and plenty to insult, yet those haters are all hiding. All waiting for GB to lose again to come out and act tough again. You are who we know you are
Hot Forum Topics
