@chic-cardinals
also what the h does chic cardinals mean?
are you a girl?
maybe that's what is going on.
and the cardinal-are you referrring to red, or arizona, or st louis, or do you just like bird s?
@chic-cardinals
also what the h does chic cardinals mean?
are you a girl?
maybe that's what is going on.
and the cardinal-are you referrring to red, or arizona, or st louis, or do you just like bird s?
@chic-cardinals
also what the h does chic cardinals mean?
are you a girl?
maybe that's what is going on.
and the cardinal-are you referrring to red, or arizona, or st louis, or do you just like bird s?
Who did I insult? No one.
Chill out, bro.i simply gave my view of what you really watched. Even my mother who never watches sports could see it was bullshit. Sports fans are by and large idiots with blinders on. Much like mask wearers
Who did I insult? No one.
Chill out, bro.i simply gave my view of what you really watched. Even my mother who never watches sports could see it was bullshit. Sports fans are by and large idiots with blinders on. Much like mask wearers
Chicago Cardinals, you blitheriing idiot lol
Chicago Cardinals, you blitheriing idiot lol
Calling the time outs with 46 seconds left before half (and TB scores a touchedown) was another boneheaded move---I never have had a high opinion of his Wilfred Brimley ass
Calling the time outs with 46 seconds left before half (and TB scores a touchedown) was another boneheaded move---I never have had a high opinion of his Wilfred Brimley ass
more than that. It’s pressure. It’s playing tight. It’s playing with no margin for error. It’s playing not to lose.
more than that. It’s pressure. It’s playing tight. It’s playing with no margin for error. It’s playing not to lose.
In other words you believe media. You must be a fake account because no one on the street believes this shit. They know it's bogus. Seems only supported on internet.
Prevent dying? It's a fucking 99.7 recovery rate. It's a flu
In other words you believe media. You must be a fake account because no one on the street believes this shit. They know it's bogus. Seems only supported on internet.
Prevent dying? It's a fucking 99.7 recovery rate. It's a flu
play after play after play getting their *ss kicked
listening to these people you woudla thought the chiefs had a chance.
watch it for yourself.
play after play after play getting their *ss kicked
listening to these people you woudla thought the chiefs had a chance.
watch it for yourself.
Thanks for sharing. Just finished watching inside the nfl on showtime. Phil Simms and Ray Lewis were on my side, regarding the game changing nature of the calls in the first half, and Michael Ervin was on your side. Those guys were as passionate and crazy as us when expressing their viewpoint. And nobody could convince anybody else.
Thanks for sharing. Just finished watching inside the nfl on showtime. Phil Simms and Ray Lewis were on my side, regarding the game changing nature of the calls in the first half, and Michael Ervin was on your side. Those guys were as passionate and crazy as us when expressing their viewpoint. And nobody could convince anybody else.
@ActionMagnet
Playing infront of a crowd of 30,000 limp dik cut outs doesnt really do it for players who experienced the true SB atmosphere last year.
With all the theatrics removed, this game just felt like a regular season game with very little intensity or immediacy from the Chiefs.
Football old timers and purists will say the game is always won in the trenches, the team that controls the line of scrimmage will usually win...this game was a perfect example of that ideology...the KC injuries on the O-line should have been a huge storyline leading up to the game, but the public type sports talk shows didnt want to make that a glory story to tip off serious bettors.
@ActionMagnet
Playing infront of a crowd of 30,000 limp dik cut outs doesnt really do it for players who experienced the true SB atmosphere last year.
With all the theatrics removed, this game just felt like a regular season game with very little intensity or immediacy from the Chiefs.
Football old timers and purists will say the game is always won in the trenches, the team that controls the line of scrimmage will usually win...this game was a perfect example of that ideology...the KC injuries on the O-line should have been a huge storyline leading up to the game, but the public type sports talk shows didnt want to make that a glory story to tip off serious bettors.
Whatever line issues existed were compounded once the team fell behind and had to pass to come back. Ray Lewis and Phill Simms said as much. Everything I read and listened to discussed the KC line, and people made wagers based on if they thought it would be an issue. As long as KC was ahead or didn’t get too far behind, and the run was still a threat, the line issues would be manageable. But once the refs spotted the Buccaneers two first half touchdowns and nullified a KC interception. It was game over.
Whatever line issues existed were compounded once the team fell behind and had to pass to come back. Ray Lewis and Phill Simms said as much. Everything I read and listened to discussed the KC line, and people made wagers based on if they thought it would be an issue. As long as KC was ahead or didn’t get too far behind, and the run was still a threat, the line issues would be manageable. But once the refs spotted the Buccaneers two first half touchdowns and nullified a KC interception. It was game over.
Im here late. Regarding the Superbowl, good for Tampa backers. I was in heavy on the Chiefs. Did I miscap the game? yes I did. I misread two things: 1) The impact of Tampa´s D line on KC´s O Line; and 2) Arians did commit to the run, and I anticipated he wouldnt. However, if any of you believes that the game would have been the same, had that absurd holding call not been made, you are confirming how retarded you are. That holding call represented a shift between KC having the ball at its 40 yard line more or less, with the score 7-3; to KC receiving the ball at its 25 with the score 14-3. Big momentum shift.
Im here late. Regarding the Superbowl, good for Tampa backers. I was in heavy on the Chiefs. Did I miscap the game? yes I did. I misread two things: 1) The impact of Tampa´s D line on KC´s O Line; and 2) Arians did commit to the run, and I anticipated he wouldnt. However, if any of you believes that the game would have been the same, had that absurd holding call not been made, you are confirming how retarded you are. That holding call represented a shift between KC having the ball at its 40 yard line more or less, with the score 7-3; to KC receiving the ball at its 25 with the score 14-3. Big momentum shift.
@budwiser
Come on!
First, I doubt that you have better numbers than I do the past 2 years. You won this game, good for you. I lost it, but it was a game in which I played 1.25 u instead of my usual 1u. Its just another loss for me. The fake ego may hurt more since I put more effort on my handicapping because it was the big game, but in the end this loss is practically the same value as my loss in the NFC Championship, or my win in the AFC Championship, or my 2 wins in the Divisional round, or my 2-1 in Wild Card round.
Second, winning a game says nothing. Variance is huge, in the Super Bowl or in the regular season. Picking right one Super Bowl does not say much about your ability to cap. Hell, picking right 5 Super Bowls doesn´t necesarily either. I could pick blindly and almost certainly will have a 50% chance still. In sportsbetting as long as you are disciplined and don´t go nuts on a couple of games and blow your BR, the only thing that matters is to have a positive ROI at the end of each season. You will lose a lot of games, but hopefully, you will win more :) The Big Game is just another game.
It ain´t excuses. Tampa won well and the game is over. Brady threw 200 yards and its RBs went mental as they should have. Props to Arians for that. But, noone can deny that the refs calls on their favor were super controversial, while KC did not get a single controversial call to its side.
In the end, the key is to win and try to learrn and improve... and to lose, and try to learn and improve. The only goal is that our ROIS improve year after year.
@budwiser
Come on!
First, I doubt that you have better numbers than I do the past 2 years. You won this game, good for you. I lost it, but it was a game in which I played 1.25 u instead of my usual 1u. Its just another loss for me. The fake ego may hurt more since I put more effort on my handicapping because it was the big game, but in the end this loss is practically the same value as my loss in the NFC Championship, or my win in the AFC Championship, or my 2 wins in the Divisional round, or my 2-1 in Wild Card round.
Second, winning a game says nothing. Variance is huge, in the Super Bowl or in the regular season. Picking right one Super Bowl does not say much about your ability to cap. Hell, picking right 5 Super Bowls doesn´t necesarily either. I could pick blindly and almost certainly will have a 50% chance still. In sportsbetting as long as you are disciplined and don´t go nuts on a couple of games and blow your BR, the only thing that matters is to have a positive ROI at the end of each season. You will lose a lot of games, but hopefully, you will win more :) The Big Game is just another game.
It ain´t excuses. Tampa won well and the game is over. Brady threw 200 yards and its RBs went mental as they should have. Props to Arians for that. But, noone can deny that the refs calls on their favor were super controversial, while KC did not get a single controversial call to its side.
In the end, the key is to win and try to learrn and improve... and to lose, and try to learn and improve. The only goal is that our ROIS improve year after year.
@gutinstinctus
yeah i agree the key is to win and try to learn and improve...
but when you're saying your pick had a chance minus the ref calls, you're making excuses. that pick was disaster
there was not one single controversial call the entire 2nd half. the chiefs scored 3 points.
just about all the controversial calls were on one single drive. let's say the buccs don't score, that's 7 points lost.
i totally get where you're coming-you get 7 points it changes the whole complexion of the game, but i mean come on.
@gutinstinctus
yeah i agree the key is to win and try to learn and improve...
but when you're saying your pick had a chance minus the ref calls, you're making excuses. that pick was disaster
there was not one single controversial call the entire 2nd half. the chiefs scored 3 points.
just about all the controversial calls were on one single drive. let's say the buccs don't score, that's 7 points lost.
i totally get where you're coming-you get 7 points it changes the whole complexion of the game, but i mean come on.
@budwiser
They will never understand the dynamics of the " same season revenging run stuffing home dog scenario " plus I haven't heard any of these "fix theorist " mention that the Chiefs OL was put together with glue.
@budwiser
They will never understand the dynamics of the " same season revenging run stuffing home dog scenario " plus I haven't heard any of these "fix theorist " mention that the Chiefs OL was put together with glue.
@Wizerguy
no question.
mahomes has turf toe never entered the formulation either
it was a sharp/square divide. no doubt. been on the mush side, just thankful it's not this time.
@Wizerguy
no question.
mahomes has turf toe never entered the formulation either
it was a sharp/square divide. no doubt. been on the mush side, just thankful it's not this time.
What does that even mean? You totally agree that it changes the whole complexion of the game but "come on."?! It either does or it doesn't. If you think it doesn't then you are not, in my opinion, a student of the game. You just look at the final score and move on. That's your choice. But as Aristotle said, an unexamined football game is not worth watching.
What does that even mean? You totally agree that it changes the whole complexion of the game but "come on."?! It either does or it doesn't. If you think it doesn't then you are not, in my opinion, a student of the game. You just look at the final score and move on. That's your choice. But as Aristotle said, an unexamined football game is not worth watching.
They should have used superglue!
They should have used superglue!
@begginerboy
i understand his argument. given it's football.
but that wasn't a game where that argument is valid. as i said the chiefs had the entire 2nd half to come back, with no ref issues. 3 points and an interception to end the game. 3 drives by the buccs where they weren't trying to score, just run down clock.
we just go in circles here.
do me a favor next year wire me ur cash. but don't forget to include a letter detailing the excuses which i'll be sure to read and feel sympathy for.
@begginerboy
i understand his argument. given it's football.
but that wasn't a game where that argument is valid. as i said the chiefs had the entire 2nd half to come back, with no ref issues. 3 points and an interception to end the game. 3 drives by the buccs where they weren't trying to score, just run down clock.
we just go in circles here.
do me a favor next year wire me ur cash. but don't forget to include a letter detailing the excuses which i'll be sure to read and feel sympathy for.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.