@Michigan_D
Oh, the AI angle now... I see haha... well whatever you think the case may be, AI or not, he’s more disciplined than 90% of this forum.
@Michigan_D
Oh, the AI angle now... I see haha... well whatever you think the case may be, AI or not, he’s more disciplined than 90% of this forum.
@Michigan_D
Oh, the AI angle now... I see haha... well whatever you think the case may be, AI or not, he’s more disciplined than 90% of this forum.
Hey brother, play nice… keep following. Enjoy the play
See you on the other side
Hey brother, play nice… keep following. Enjoy the play
See you on the other side
Quiet Whale – Sept 8 (NFL Week 1, MNF)
NFL YTD: 4–0 (+9.10u)
College YTD: 3–5 (–3.26u)
Football Overall YTD: 7–5 (+5.84u)
Play: Minnesota Vikings ML –112 (1.5u)
Cutoff: Playable to –118. Do not chase beyond –120.
Rationale:
Chicago drew the majority of handle, yet Circa and other sharp anchors flipped Minnesota to the favorite and held them there. That resistance against public flow is a textbook syndicate tell.
Consensus market pricing sat between –114 and –120 on the Vikings ML. FanDuel’s –112 was an off-market price and the sharper entry compared to laying –1 at Circa or –1.5 at retail. That positioning protected against a 1-point win while securing the same value.
This alignment of sharp/public divergence, market resistance, and off-market ML value validates Vikings ML –112 as today’s syndicate play.
Quiet Whale – Sept 8 (NFL Week 1, MNF)
NFL YTD: 4–0 (+9.10u)
College YTD: 3–5 (–3.26u)
Football Overall YTD: 7–5 (+5.84u)
Play: Minnesota Vikings ML –112 (1.5u)
Cutoff: Playable to –118. Do not chase beyond –120.
Rationale:
Chicago drew the majority of handle, yet Circa and other sharp anchors flipped Minnesota to the favorite and held them there. That resistance against public flow is a textbook syndicate tell.
Consensus market pricing sat between –114 and –120 on the Vikings ML. FanDuel’s –112 was an off-market price and the sharper entry compared to laying –1 at Circa or –1.5 at retail. That positioning protected against a 1-point win while securing the same value.
This alignment of sharp/public divergence, market resistance, and off-market ML value validates Vikings ML –112 as today’s syndicate play.
Quiet Whale – NFL Week 1 Recap
NFL YTD: 5–0 (+10.60u)
College YTD: 3–5 (–3.26u)
Football Overall YTD: 8–5 (+7.34u)
Result: Vikings ML –112 (WIN)
Final: Vikings 27, Bears 24
Recap:
Chicago drew the majority of handle, but Circa and sharper anchors flipped Minnesota to the favorite and held the line firm. Consensus sat between –114 and –120 on the ML, while FanDuel’s –112 gave us an off-market entry that protected against spread variance.
Our syndicate number made Minnesota –2, and the market resistance against Bears money was validated on the field in a 27–24 win.
Disciplined approach, sharp/public divergence confirmed, and the syndicate ticket cashed to complete a clean sweep for Week 1.
Quiet Whale – NFL Week 1 Recap
NFL YTD: 5–0 (+10.60u)
College YTD: 3–5 (–3.26u)
Football Overall YTD: 8–5 (+7.34u)
Result: Vikings ML –112 (WIN)
Final: Vikings 27, Bears 24
Recap:
Chicago drew the majority of handle, but Circa and sharper anchors flipped Minnesota to the favorite and held the line firm. Consensus sat between –114 and –120 on the ML, while FanDuel’s –112 gave us an off-market entry that protected against spread variance.
Our syndicate number made Minnesota –2, and the market resistance against Bears money was validated on the field in a 27–24 win.
Disciplined approach, sharp/public divergence confirmed, and the syndicate ticket cashed to complete a clean sweep for Week 1.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.