It seems like every time when i take Pelicans they lose and when i fade
them they win... broken team for betting (for me of course). Yep i wait
Australia to win tomorrow for 2 clear units profit
I have one College basketball tonight:
Cleveland State Vikings - 1 1.1 units (to win 1)
0
It seems like every time when i take Pelicans they lose and when i fade
them they win... broken team for betting (for me of course). Yep i wait
Australia to win tomorrow for 2 clear units profit
Pushed with Cavs last night so no changes in the record. For tonight i really love one away dog!
Mavericks just lost three in a row (Bulls, Pelicans and Grizzlies last night). If look carefully on these three teams you can see great inside teams with very good big guys. Tonight they finally escape from these scary bigger teams and will face running type three point shooting more oriented team. I know they are on zero rest but Rockets defense stinks many times so i can easily put an unit for the good running offense road team.
Mavericks + 4 1.1 units (to win 1)
0
Pushed with Cavs last night so no changes in the record. For tonight i really love one away dog!
Mavericks just lost three in a row (Bulls, Pelicans and Grizzlies last night). If look carefully on these three teams you can see great inside teams with very good big guys. Tonight they finally escape from these scary bigger teams and will face running type three point shooting more oriented team. I know they are on zero rest but Rockets defense stinks many times so i can easily put an unit for the good running offense road team.
Yep they have pretty decent big guys but the Houston philosophy is in running and triples. Here is the proof of that. They lead NBA in TPA (three point attempts) per game so far in the season with 33.6 (wow). NO are with 18.8 tpa per game, CHI are 21.3 tpa per game and MEM are 16.0 tpa per game. Absolutely different opponents. According what i saw so far in the season Dallas matchup well against similar running offense teams. They are closer to Rockets than previous three opponents. Mavs are 26.5 tpa per game.
0
Yep they have pretty decent big guys but the Houston philosophy is in running and triples. Here is the proof of that. They lead NBA in TPA (three point attempts) per game so far in the season with 33.6 (wow). NO are with 18.8 tpa per game, CHI are 21.3 tpa per game and MEM are 16.0 tpa per game. Absolutely different opponents. According what i saw so far in the season Dallas matchup well against similar running offense teams. They are closer to Rockets than previous three opponents. Mavs are 26.5 tpa per game.
2-1 with one point shy of a 3-0 perfect night. Damn you Mavs....23 TOs... PGs (Rondo, Harris and Barea) combined 1-14 from the field... i really felt that Dallas will win even outright this.
Overall ATS: 70-46-4+ 19.35 units Overall Totals: 6-11-0 - 6.1 units ML Dogs 1 st Quarter: 15-3-0 + 15.25 units
Overall profit: + 28.5 units
0
2-1 with one point shy of a 3-0 perfect night. Damn you Mavs....23 TOs... PGs (Rondo, Harris and Barea) combined 1-14 from the field... i really felt that Dallas will win even outright this.
Overall ATS: 70-46-4+ 19.35 units Overall Totals: 6-11-0 - 6.1 units ML Dogs 1 st Quarter: 15-3-0 + 15.25 units
Funk, you are only one of a few I respect on this site and was wanting to know your opinion on Lakers ATS tomorrow vs Bulls. IMO, the line is inflated, my book is offering Lakers +9.5 right now. The line when these 2 met last time was -12.5 in CHI and the Bulls covered that. The Lakers were without Kobe in that game as well and it wasn't until the 4Q when the Bulls took charge. I think the line should be around -6.5 considering the Rockets were given -8 against LA. I don't think the Bulls are at the same position as Rockets offensively and defensively. I also found and SDQL which shows the home dog being 15-5 ATS. The query is HD and line>7.5 and p:HDL and pp:HDL and op:AW and ppp:ADL
0
Funk, you are only one of a few I respect on this site and was wanting to know your opinion on Lakers ATS tomorrow vs Bulls. IMO, the line is inflated, my book is offering Lakers +9.5 right now. The line when these 2 met last time was -12.5 in CHI and the Bulls covered that. The Lakers were without Kobe in that game as well and it wasn't until the 4Q when the Bulls took charge. I think the line should be around -6.5 considering the Rockets were given -8 against LA. I don't think the Bulls are at the same position as Rockets offensively and defensively. I also found and SDQL which shows the home dog being 15-5 ATS. The query is HD and line>7.5 and p:HDL and pp:HDL and op:AW and ppp:ADL
LOT of GUARDS having trouble in passing the ball. that last TO of mavs was the stupidest TO they made. HOPE they could make it in the playoffs. could the next game of the mavs be a gift?
0
LOT of GUARDS having trouble in passing the ball. that last TO of mavs was the stupidest TO they made. HOPE they could make it in the playoffs. could the next game of the mavs be a gift?
AussieDownUnder Thanks for the kind words! Really haven't got legit opinion about the line. Lakers are trash as a whole and they will tank rest of the season to guarantee another top pick from the draft. In other hand their young players will try to do their best on national television and 9.5 points look not so bad. The cover for Bulls depends on what effort they will pull on that game. I will stay away in ATS here for sure... sorry that i haven't got any good insight here. About the SDQL i really can't thrust 100% on query which has only 20 games behind. Most of the small sample size queries are result of pushing with many criteria (six in your example) which show great results in the past but in the future they are pure 50:50 situation for me. I can show you queries that started 20-0 ATS and next they turn easily to 20-6 ATS which show that they are not good in long term and the good starting result was only because of pushing. I sometimes use SDQL as a helping tool when i'm not 100% sure on some game but if i have to be honest most of the queries with less than 200 games sample size are useless.
MRnotTHATbad108 Let see what the line on next Mavs game will be and then we will know if we have gift
0
AussieDownUnder Thanks for the kind words! Really haven't got legit opinion about the line. Lakers are trash as a whole and they will tank rest of the season to guarantee another top pick from the draft. In other hand their young players will try to do their best on national television and 9.5 points look not so bad. The cover for Bulls depends on what effort they will pull on that game. I will stay away in ATS here for sure... sorry that i haven't got any good insight here. About the SDQL i really can't thrust 100% on query which has only 20 games behind. Most of the small sample size queries are result of pushing with many criteria (six in your example) which show great results in the past but in the future they are pure 50:50 situation for me. I can show you queries that started 20-0 ATS and next they turn easily to 20-6 ATS which show that they are not good in long term and the good starting result was only because of pushing. I sometimes use SDQL as a helping tool when i'm not 100% sure on some game but if i have to be honest most of the queries with less than 200 games sample size are useless.
MRnotTHATbad108 Let see what the line on next Mavs game will be and then we will know if we have gift
System total play for tonight. As you know i play total system from a month. The results from start of the season are 6-4 (60%) which is the very close to the number that hit on that system last five seasons. The system criteria fit 17 games (tonight i will bet the eleventh) this season and i play them absolutely blindly cause i really thrust on the numbers here and i know that after the last seventeenth game winning percentage will be with green color.
Bulls at Lakers - Under 195 1.1 units (to win 1)
0
System total play for tonight. As you know i play total system from a month. The results from start of the season are 6-4 (60%) which is the very close to the number that hit on that system last five seasons. The system criteria fit 17 games (tonight i will bet the eleventh) this season and i play them absolutely blindly cause i really thrust on the numbers here and i know that after the last seventeenth game winning percentage will be with green color.
AussieDownUnder Thanks for the kind words! Really haven't got legit opinion about the line. Lakers are trash as a whole and they will tank rest of the season to guarantee another top pick from the draft. In other hand their young players will try to do their best on national television and 9.5 points look not so bad. The cover for Bulls depends on what effort they will pull on that game. I will stay away in ATS here for sure... sorry that i haven't got any good insight here. About the SDQL i really can't thrust 100% on query which has only 20 games behind. Most of the small sample size queries are result of pushing with many criteria (six in your example) which show great results in the past but in the future they are pure 50:50 situation for me. I can show you queries that started 20-0 ATS and next they turn easily to 20-6 ATS which show that they are not good in long term and the good starting result was only because of pushing. I sometimes use SDQL as a helping tool when i'm not 100% sure on some game but if i have to be honest most of the queries with less than 200 games sample size are useless.
MRnotTHATbad108 Let see what the line on next Mavs game will be and then we will know if we have gift
Thanks for the reply Funk. Much appreciated. I might dig a little deeper into the SDQL's for this game. I agree, small sample size does not do much justice at all when looking for certain angles and situations. GL mate with the under in the same game.
0
Quote Originally Posted by FunkFreaker:
AussieDownUnder Thanks for the kind words! Really haven't got legit opinion about the line. Lakers are trash as a whole and they will tank rest of the season to guarantee another top pick from the draft. In other hand their young players will try to do their best on national television and 9.5 points look not so bad. The cover for Bulls depends on what effort they will pull on that game. I will stay away in ATS here for sure... sorry that i haven't got any good insight here. About the SDQL i really can't thrust 100% on query which has only 20 games behind. Most of the small sample size queries are result of pushing with many criteria (six in your example) which show great results in the past but in the future they are pure 50:50 situation for me. I can show you queries that started 20-0 ATS and next they turn easily to 20-6 ATS which show that they are not good in long term and the good starting result was only because of pushing. I sometimes use SDQL as a helping tool when i'm not 100% sure on some game but if i have to be honest most of the queries with less than 200 games sample size are useless.
MRnotTHATbad108 Let see what the line on next Mavs game will be and then we will know if we have gift
Thanks for the reply Funk. Much appreciated. I might dig a little deeper into the SDQL's for this game. I agree, small sample size does not do much justice at all when looking for certain angles and situations. GL mate with the under in the same game.
Wolves are different team with Kevin Martin back. Now they have the scoring option for taking some wins until rest of the season. Tonight they face bad Philly team ? Good chance Wolves to take two in a row. And the line is just perfect to fade Sixers with less than 5 points. Thanks.
0
Timberwolves - 2.5 1.1 units (to win 1)
Wolves are different team with Kevin Martin back. Now they have the scoring option for taking some wins until rest of the season. Tonight they face bad Philly team ? Good chance Wolves to take two in a row. And the line is just perfect to fade Sixers with less than 5 points. Thanks.
Really haven't got legit opinion about the line. Lakers are trash as a whole and they will tank rest of the season to guarantee another top pick from the draft. In other hand their young players will try to do their best on national television and 9.5 points look not so bad. The cover for Bulls depends on what effort they will pull on that game. I will stay away in ATS here for sure... sorry that i haven't got any good insight here. About the SDQL i really can't thrust 100% on query which has only 20 games behind. Most of the small sample size queries are result of pushing with many criteria (six in your example) which show great results in the past but in the future they are pure 50:50 situation for me. I can show you queries that started 20-0 ATS and next they turn easily to 20-6 ATS which show that they are not good in long term and the good starting result was only because of pushing. I sometimes use SDQL as a helping tool when i'm not 100% sure on some game but if i have to be honest most of the queries with less than 200 games sample size are useless.
Established in 1995,
gl funk
Hot Forum Topics
