All Forums | NBA Betting Forum

1995-1996 Chicago Bulls remains the greatest team of all time.

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 4121
Posts: 47
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2001
Posts: 41904
Posted: #1
Congrats to LeBron James and company for bringing Cleveland their first NBA championship.

Lots of questions are answered.

Warriors would not even sniff 6 games against 72 win Bulls. I'd say Bulls in five if not sweep.

Last year's championship for Warriors has a question mark. Can they really beat Cleveland with those two players healthy?

The uninamous MVP performing like this in an NBA Finals?.... Joke...

My, my...
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2005
Posts: 41476
Posted: #2
They remained the greatest team whether GS won this game or not.  And it isn't even close.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2007
Posts: 2002
Posted: #3

I 'm not so convinced, and I watched both teams extensively.  It's a different league now though. 

 

 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2011
Posts: 6622
Posted: #4
Nope, 2015-2016 Warriors are much better than 95-96, but LeBron is just too much to handle. End of discussion. I think Bulls would struggle to avoid a sweep. 
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2009
Posts: 3006
Posted: #5
87' Lakers!
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2007
Posts: 2002
Posted: #6

Quote Originally Posted by Raiderpug:

87' Lakers!


Worthy, Kareem and Magic,  I remember them well.  Showtime, well before the Bulls.

Then again, you could always look at the Celtics and their insane runs.

 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2001
Posts: 41904
Posted: #7
Quote Originally Posted by johnnyfry:

I 'm not so convinced, and I watched both teams extensively.  It's a different league now though. 

 


That doesn't matter at all. Bulls would beat these fakers with both eras applied. 

Heck, give Warriors the home court and they'd still lose. 

Boy, would I love to see Rodman get in Greens a** all day. 
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2015
Posts: 1881
Posted: #8
bullls would have swept both teams or at worst 4-1
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2005
Posts: 41476
Posted: #9
Quote Originally Posted by Asomugha:

Nope, 2015-2016 Warriors are much better than 95-96, but LeBron is just too much to handle. End of discussion. I think Bulls would struggle to avoid a sweep. 
You got to be trolling son, because nobody is that stupid.  That Bulls team was probably the best defensive team in NBA history with Jordan, Pippin, and Rodman.  They were a lot better than this Cleveland team was, and they had several offensive weapons off the bench.  Even with it being a different league and athletes today have many more tools to make their body's better, Bulls with the series 4--1
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2001
Posts: 41904
Posted: #10
Quote Originally Posted by Asomugha:

Nope, 2015-2016 Warriors are much better than 95-96, but LeBron is just too much to handle. End of discussion. I think Bulls would struggle to avoid a sweep. 



 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2011
Posts: 6622
Posted: #11
Quote Originally Posted by elia20:

bullls would have swept both teams or at worst 4-1


Atlanta Hawks would sweep the Bulls. Much more athletic, better defenders, better scorers. Athletically far ahead and Bulls wouldnt be able to hang around even based on fatigue. 
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2011
Posts: 6622
Posted: #12
Quote Originally Posted by Bling:

You got to be trolling son, because nobody is that stupid.  That Bulls team was probably the best defensive team in NBA history with Jordan, Pippin, and Rodman.  They were a lot better than this Cleveland team was, and they had several offensive weapons off the bench.  Even with it being a different league and athletes today have many more tools to make their body's better, Bulls with the series 4--1

Better than this Cleveland team by far yeah, but so was this Warriors team. The Warriors team is far ahead of Cleveland, its not even a question. But again, theres no1 close to the level of LeBron and thats why they won. Cleveland are absolute trash. This would honestly not make the playoffs without LeBron but with LeBron they are capable of beating the best team in history. 
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2004
Posts: 3253
Posted: #13
Quote Originally Posted by Bling:

You got to be trolling son, because nobody is that stupid.  That Bulls team was probably the best defensive team in NBA history with Jordan, Pippin, and Rodman.  They were a lot better than this Cleveland team was, and they had several offensive weapons off the bench.  Even with it being a different league and athletes today have many more tools to make their body's better, Bulls with the series 4--1

Best defensive team in history? Have you even checked their defensive rating? https://www.basketball-reference.com/teams/CHI/1996.html

Bulls defensive rating is 101.8 and that is with all the so called physicality being allowed. They average 22.0 fouls per game. In contrast the 2015-2016 Spurs have a defensive rating of 99.0 and only commits 17.5 fouls per game despite the league being "soft". 

The Bulls are an excellent defensive team, but to call them the best defensive team of all time would be a stretch. 
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2005
Posts: 41476
Posted: #14
Quote Originally Posted by wallet:


Best defensive team in history? Have you even checked their defensive rating? https://www.basketball-reference.com/teams/CHI/1996.html

Bulls defensive rating is 101.8 and that is with all the so called physicality being allowed. They average 22.0 fouls per game. In contrast the 2015-2016 Spurs have a defensive rating of 99.0 and only commits 17.5 fouls per game despite the league being "soft". 

The Bulls are an excellent defensive team, but to call them the best defensive team of all time would be a stretch. 
Defensive rating??  Sounds about as worthless as QB rating

It's all about the intangibles son. 
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2010
Posts: 5575
Posted: #15
72 win Bulls are the best in history, and the 85 Bears are the best in history for NFL

I lived it and watched it all... those Chicago teams simply dominated everybody with no question at all.


I named my first born son Jordan Michael... for good reason

Chicago sports rock!!!  Blackhawks have done some good damage lately, and the Cubs are about to leave their mark


 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2011
Posts: 29
Posted: #16
Please, a 2 time back to back MVP playing like this? Are you kidding me! OK, you say he never recovered from his injury but does that explain his great lack of on court decisions? Steph, is going to and should take a lot of heat for this !!!
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2005
Posts: 41476
Posted: #17
People are actually arguing that this GS team is better.  Is this the real world  They gave up a 3-1 series lead.  That Bulls team would never have done that, not in a million years
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2010
Posts: 5575
Posted: #18
Quote Originally Posted by grande11111:

Please, a 2 time back to back MVP playing like this? Are you kidding me! OK, you say he never recovered from his injury but does that explain his great lack of on court decisions? Steph, is going to and should take a lot of heat for this !!!

I'm not going to make any excuses for him... but the fact is he was injured down the stretch.  An injured athlete is simply not as effective.  I will let his play next season tell the story.


 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2004
Posts: 3253
Posted: #19
Quote Originally Posted by Bling:

Defensive rating??  Sounds about as worthless as QB rating

It's all about the intangibles son. 

This has to be the dumbest comment I've ever read. The basic premise behind defense is preventing the opposite team from scoring. If you allow more points per 100 possessions with the benefit of "physicality" etc., compared to a team which fouls less and allows lesser points per 100 possessions, how can you be considered the best defensive team in history? What do you judge them by? 
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Jun, 2013
Posts: 10302
Posted: #20
MJ would not have given up 3-1 series lead.
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2011
Posts: 6622
Posted: #21
Its not a matter of "giving something up" its a matter of LeBron TAKING it as he pleases. Bulls could have a 3-0 lead, but against LeBron what is that worth? Lol. Its worth garbage. 
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2005
Posts: 41476
Posted: #22
Quote Originally Posted by Asomugha:

Its not a matter of "giving something up" its a matter of LeBron TAKING it as he pleases. Bulls could have a 3-0 lead, but against LeBron what is that worth? Lol. Its worth garbage. 
Did you forget that Bulls had a little player called Michel Jordan
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2004
Posts: 3253
Posted: #23
At the end of the day, the intangibles may not appear under the stats of players, but it would certainly appear in team stats. If defense is just "intangibles", then it should show up in points allowed per 100 possessions. So if a team has more "intangibles", then they should allow lesser points per 100 possessions. 
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2016
Posts: 807
Posted: #24
Quote Originally Posted by Asomugha:

Nope, 2015-2016 Warriors are much better than 95-96, but LeBron is just too much to handle. End of discussion. I think Bulls would struggle to avoid a sweep. 

You are a fxxking joke , Warriors not even close to the Bulls . This warrior team have nothing but a bunch of 3 points shooter . When the shots are not going in , that's why they lost the final . 
 
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2010
Posts: 5575
Posted: #25
Bulls were a menace on defense, they had clutch scorers, they had a madman rebounding... they had the very best coach of all time

I;m shocked this is even a discussion.

Lebron is by far the very best in the game today... no question - but that Bulls team would sweep the cavs today
All Forums | NBA Betting Forum
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gambling
Betting Sites
US Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Ultimate Race
Office Pools
The Covers community has
810,221
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 30 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
21+
Gambling problem? Call 1-800-GAMBLER
Help Privacy Terms of Service Cookies Sitemap Forum
Covers is verified safe by:
Evalon Logo Logo GPWA Logo GDPR logo Logo GeoTrust logo Logo PCI DSS logo Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2026 CS Media Ltd. All Rights Reserved.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.