I can't believe that a piece of crap like NO COUNTRY FOR OLD MEN actually won Best Picture. The movie is absolutely horrible and I wanted my money back when I left the theater. I only went to see the film because it won Best Picture but obviously alot of people were paid off to make that their vote. Don't know how JUNO got nominated. That picture was terrible also...had maybe 3 laughs in the whole film and the production quality was dirt cheap. They didn't use an orchechstra for the score. They had some bookstore poetry reader playing a guitar and singing boring songs he had written. MICHAEL CLAYTON I liked but only because of the portrayal of the lawyer with bipolar disorder and I only liked it because I work inpatient psychiatry...I can't believe the general public would like it...and how did the chic in the film win Best supporting Acress...she was the worst part about the film. I didn't see ATTONMENT but every one has told me it was horrible...why didn't they come up with better choices for best picture of the year...I can't say right off the top of my head which film over the past year was best but it sure wasn't any of these pieces of crap.
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
I can't believe that a piece of crap like NO COUNTRY FOR OLD MEN actually won Best Picture. The movie is absolutely horrible and I wanted my money back when I left the theater. I only went to see the film because it won Best Picture but obviously alot of people were paid off to make that their vote. Don't know how JUNO got nominated. That picture was terrible also...had maybe 3 laughs in the whole film and the production quality was dirt cheap. They didn't use an orchechstra for the score. They had some bookstore poetry reader playing a guitar and singing boring songs he had written. MICHAEL CLAYTON I liked but only because of the portrayal of the lawyer with bipolar disorder and I only liked it because I work inpatient psychiatry...I can't believe the general public would like it...and how did the chic in the film win Best supporting Acress...she was the worst part about the film. I didn't see ATTONMENT but every one has told me it was horrible...why didn't they come up with better choices for best picture of the year...I can't say right off the top of my head which film over the past year was best but it sure wasn't any of these pieces of crap.
No Country for Old Men..... brilliant movie, makes you really think about what is really happening. I did not understand what had happened until after I left the theatre and looked it up on Wikipedia, but it helped me make sense of the whole movie. Great concept, if you can pick up on what happened in the movie and make sense of the ending.
No Country for Old Men..... brilliant movie, makes you really think about what is really happening. I did not understand what had happened until after I left the theatre and looked it up on Wikipedia, but it helped me make sense of the whole movie. Great concept, if you can pick up on what happened in the movie and make sense of the ending.
guess it is good somebody liked it but it is still trash in my book. I understand it is a comment on what our society has turned in to but it's still a piece of crap...just like the movie Natural Born Killers and the ironic thing is Woody Hearlson was in that one too.
guess it is good somebody liked it but it is still trash in my book. I understand it is a comment on what our society has turned in to but it's still a piece of crap...just like the movie Natural Born Killers and the ironic thing is Woody Hearlson was in that one too.
It's not a movie I would recommend because I only like it because of the portrayal of the lawyer with bipolar disorder....I work inpatient pyschiatry and have taken care of patients just like him...mean professionals even layers just like him
It's not a movie I would recommend because I only like it because of the portrayal of the lawyer with bipolar disorder....I work inpatient pyschiatry and have taken care of patients just like him...mean professionals even layers just like him
AMAZING GRACE, 300, BLADES OF GLORY, PIRATES OF THE CARIBBEAN: AT THE END OF THE WORLD, SICKO, LIVE FREE OR DIE HARD, HAIRSPRAY, THE SIMPSON'S MOVIE, BECOMING JANE, BOURNE ULTIMATUM, SHOOT 'EM UP, ACROSS THE UNIVERSE, AUGUST RUSH, and THE BUCKET LIST
AMAZING GRACE, 300, BLADES OF GLORY, PIRATES OF THE CARIBBEAN: AT THE END OF THE WORLD, SICKO, LIVE FREE OR DIE HARD, HAIRSPRAY, THE SIMPSON'S MOVIE, BECOMING JANE, BOURNE ULTIMATUM, SHOOT 'EM UP, ACROSS THE UNIVERSE, AUGUST RUSH, and THE BUCKET LIST
I can't believe that a piece of crap like NO COUNTRY FOR OLD MEN actually won Best Picture. The movie is absolutely horrible and I wanted my money back when I left the theater. I only went to see the film because it won Best Picture but obviously alot of people were paid off to make that their vote. Don't know how JUNO got nominated. That picture was terrible also...had maybe 3 laughs in the whole film and the production quality was dirt cheap. They didn't use an orchechstra for the score. They had some bookstore poetry reader playing a guitar and singing boring songs he had written. MICHAEL CLAYTON I liked but only because of the portrayal of the lawyer with bipolar disorder and I only liked it because I work inpatient psychiatry...I can't believe the general public would like it...and how did the chic in the film win Best supporting Acress...she was the worst part about the film. I didn't see ATTONMENT but every one has told me it was horrible...why didn't they come up with better choices for best picture of the year...I can't say right off the top of my head which film over the past year was best but it sure wasn't any of these pieces of crap.
Clayton doesnt have bipolar disorde....Juno doesnt compose their score from a "guy reading booktore poetry....and just because you are too dumb to understand both the symbolism and irony of No Country doesnt men it is not a good film....By looking at the movies you enjoy I can see intelligence level and understand now why you didn' like some of 2007's best films.
Quote Originally Posted by WORLDCONTROL:
I can't believe that a piece of crap like NO COUNTRY FOR OLD MEN actually won Best Picture. The movie is absolutely horrible and I wanted my money back when I left the theater. I only went to see the film because it won Best Picture but obviously alot of people were paid off to make that their vote. Don't know how JUNO got nominated. That picture was terrible also...had maybe 3 laughs in the whole film and the production quality was dirt cheap. They didn't use an orchechstra for the score. They had some bookstore poetry reader playing a guitar and singing boring songs he had written. MICHAEL CLAYTON I liked but only because of the portrayal of the lawyer with bipolar disorder and I only liked it because I work inpatient psychiatry...I can't believe the general public would like it...and how did the chic in the film win Best supporting Acress...she was the worst part about the film. I didn't see ATTONMENT but every one has told me it was horrible...why didn't they come up with better choices for best picture of the year...I can't say right off the top of my head which film over the past year was best but it sure wasn't any of these pieces of crap.
Clayton doesnt have bipolar disorde....Juno doesnt compose their score from a "guy reading booktore poetry....and just because you are too dumb to understand both the symbolism and irony of No Country doesnt men it is not a good film....By looking at the movies you enjoy I can see intelligence level and understand now why you didn' like some of 2007's best films.
AMAZING GRACE, 300, BLADES OF GLORY, PIRATES OF THE CARIBBEAN: AT THE END OF THE WORLD, SICKO, LIVE FREE OR DIE HARD, HAIRSPRAY, THE SIMPSON'S MOVIE, BECOMING JANE, BOURNE ULTIMATUM, SHOOT 'EM UP, ACROSS THE UNIVERSE, AUGUST RUSH, and THE BUCKET LIST
You say these movies are all better then No Country for Old Men and There Will be Blood?
My god
Quote Originally Posted by WORLDCONTROL:
AMAZING GRACE, 300, BLADES OF GLORY, PIRATES OF THE CARIBBEAN: AT THE END OF THE WORLD, SICKO, LIVE FREE OR DIE HARD, HAIRSPRAY, THE SIMPSON'S MOVIE, BECOMING JANE, BOURNE ULTIMATUM, SHOOT 'EM UP, ACROSS THE UNIVERSE, AUGUST RUSH, and THE BUCKET LIST
You say these movies are all better then No Country for Old Men and There Will be Blood?
agdci, your the idiot. I never said Clayton had bipolar disorder...it's the attoney who took his clothes off and ended up in jail that I was talking about. You make reference to not understanding symbolism but your statement about the score in Juno illustrates that you don't understand symbolism. I totally understand the symbolism in NO COUNTRY FOR OLD MEN and the symbolism is not enough to make the movie entertaining or moving to me. In the movie NATURAL BORN KILLERS the use of different aspects of the cenimatic media where sheer genius but that movie is still a peice of crap just like NO COUNTRY FOR OLD MEN is a peice of crap because of the subject matter and ironiclly both Tommy Lee Jones and Woody Harrelson are in both movies.
agdci and TonyaHarding, if you like the movie then that's just great for both of you but there is no reason to be insulting. If you have an intelligent opinion to share then write something intelligent. TonyaHarding if you ever come into one of my topics again and call me a "douchebag" or anything insulting or degrading I will have you banned.
agdci, not everyone is going to like the same kind of movies and I have no problem with that. If you like NO COUNTRY FOR OLD men because of the symbolism then get to writting about the specific examples of the symbolism and why they are entertaining. Don't ever come into one of my topics and make some superficial statement about "symbolism" and "intelligence" without illustrating your point to the rest of the readers of the forum.
agdci, your the idiot. I never said Clayton had bipolar disorder...it's the attoney who took his clothes off and ended up in jail that I was talking about. You make reference to not understanding symbolism but your statement about the score in Juno illustrates that you don't understand symbolism. I totally understand the symbolism in NO COUNTRY FOR OLD MEN and the symbolism is not enough to make the movie entertaining or moving to me. In the movie NATURAL BORN KILLERS the use of different aspects of the cenimatic media where sheer genius but that movie is still a peice of crap just like NO COUNTRY FOR OLD MEN is a peice of crap because of the subject matter and ironiclly both Tommy Lee Jones and Woody Harrelson are in both movies.
agdci and TonyaHarding, if you like the movie then that's just great for both of you but there is no reason to be insulting. If you have an intelligent opinion to share then write something intelligent. TonyaHarding if you ever come into one of my topics again and call me a "douchebag" or anything insulting or degrading I will have you banned.
agdci, not everyone is going to like the same kind of movies and I have no problem with that. If you like NO COUNTRY FOR OLD men because of the symbolism then get to writting about the specific examples of the symbolism and why they are entertaining. Don't ever come into one of my topics and make some superficial statement about "symbolism" and "intelligence" without illustrating your point to the rest of the readers of the forum.
agdci, it's amazing that you can make accusations but you are not presenting any thing to illustrate your point. If the symbolism is so great then write about it and illustrate it. If there is anything about the film you like then write about it in a specific enough way that the reader of the forum can be enlightened. It's also amazing that out of 15 films that I list you find only 2 of them to "piece of garbage skit". You can have your own opinion about films and I am fine with people who have different views that I do but it's not ok to come in here and make personal attacks by way insults on anything that anyone presents here. You have no idea of what I know about symbolism or any literary elements but especially symbolism because I don't discuss any of them here because to me the film is so bad they aren't relevant. If you love the symbolism so much then get off your lazy behind and write about in this forum and if you like in this thread. Don't assume that because you are a film student that you know so much because thousands of film students flunk out every year and of the ones who do graduate only a few ever make it in the buisness. So I am not impressed by your claim of being a film student. You are no expert even if you are a film student.
agdci, it's amazing that you can make accusations but you are not presenting any thing to illustrate your point. If the symbolism is so great then write about it and illustrate it. If there is anything about the film you like then write about it in a specific enough way that the reader of the forum can be enlightened. It's also amazing that out of 15 films that I list you find only 2 of them to "piece of garbage skit". You can have your own opinion about films and I am fine with people who have different views that I do but it's not ok to come in here and make personal attacks by way insults on anything that anyone presents here. You have no idea of what I know about symbolism or any literary elements but especially symbolism because I don't discuss any of them here because to me the film is so bad they aren't relevant. If you love the symbolism so much then get off your lazy behind and write about in this forum and if you like in this thread. Don't assume that because you are a film student that you know so much because thousands of film students flunk out every year and of the ones who do graduate only a few ever make it in the buisness. So I am not impressed by your claim of being a film student. You are no expert even if you are a film student.
World Control, you're dead on about Old Country. Finally saw the movie and man it was awful. Anyone that liked it, apparently likes boring, slow, pointless movies. So what, a guy tries to steal 2 million dollars and gets killed for it? Good. End of story, why try and make a movie out of it? Stupid film.
World Control, you're dead on about Old Country. Finally saw the movie and man it was awful. Anyone that liked it, apparently likes boring, slow, pointless movies. So what, a guy tries to steal 2 million dollars and gets killed for it? Good. End of story, why try and make a movie out of it? Stupid film.
No Country For Old Men
Hot Forum Topics
