Posted:
#76
So BET 1 on each
RANGERS +130 300 to win 390
TWINS +125 300 to win 375
PIRATES +110 300 to win 330
right?
0
UNDERDOG CHASE PLAYS...WEEK 8
Posted:
#80
Quote Originally Posted by dcd1220:
So now that Min got rained out how does the system work for the last 2 games or is this series a no play?
Also another question is if a game on bet 2 gets rained out and not made up in that same series do you just cut your losses from the first game and move on?
WHITE SOX/MINN now becomes a solo play not a series play.. Play it as a home dog only. But Morneau is out so this becomes a non play for me. One game done win or lose.
If the Middle game is rained out then the series play is over and the same pricnicpal applies, take it as a stand alone bet if thte game has value.
Thanks
0
Posted:
#85
sorry to post this same idea again, but what do you think about using this strategy on totals? betting the over in all 3 games or the under based on the pitching matchups and the way the offenses are playing. i know there wouldnt be underdogs, but the juice wouldnt be too killer either. thanks for the work Semperfi!
0
Posted:
#87
pocketjjax..
It could be successful, but the problem jumping right in is how much data has been tracked to narrow down selections. I encourage you to make it successful. the biggest difference between what we do is the motivation for a team not to be swept. For a total OVER to hit both teams would prob need to contribute which means a ton of variables. I would think UNDERS are a teams larger objective. If you have a plan I'd be willing to give feedback if you want. GL
It could be successful, but the problem jumping right in is how much data has been tracked to narrow down selections. I encourage you to make it successful. the biggest difference between what we do is the motivation for a team not to be swept. For a total OVER to hit both teams would prob need to contribute which means a ton of variables. I would think UNDERS are a teams larger objective. If you have a plan I'd be willing to give feedback if you want. GL
0
Posted:
#89
Quote Originally Posted by poketjjax:
sorry to post this same idea again, but what do you think about using this strategy on totals? betting the over in all 3 games or the under based on the pitching matchups and the way the offenses are playing. i know there wouldnt be underdogs, but the juice wouldnt be too killer either. thanks for the work Semperfi!
sorry to post this same idea again, but what do you think about using this strategy on totals? betting the over in all 3 games or the under based on the pitching matchups and the way the offenses are playing. i know there wouldnt be underdogs, but the juice wouldnt be too killer either. thanks for the work Semperfi!
Over/Unders are coin flips and maybe if you did some research on the last 10 o/u with both teams and came up with some formula then maybe I would track it. Just not a big over/under player unless I see a huge trend somewhere. I think it has some merit but would need some type of formula to follow like I do for my dog plays.
0
Posted:
#95
Quote Originally Posted by littlesprings:
Semperfi, my book has Holland as the starter not Harrison, is your underdog play based on Harrison or Holland for this series....good luck on your play tonight....
Semperfi, my book has Holland as the starter not Harrison, is your underdog play based on Harrison or Holland for this series....good luck on your play tonight....
It's Holland tonight. Doesn't have a great track record against the Yanks but he's going against Nova, so... I'm takin' em!
0
Hot Forum Topics
