This has to be a low scoring game, right?
We shall see! They have been bragging up how good the pitching is going to be on ESPN! You know what that usually means
So far, it means that the pitching has been lights out, after 2 innings.
We shall see! They have been bragging up how good the pitching is going to be on ESPN! You know what that usually means
So far, it means that the pitching has been lights out, after 2 innings.
Dont know where you're getting your lines from, but since 2001 its U/O 5-4, and from '95-'99 is was U/O 4-1 (I can't find a line for 2000's game, but rarely in the last decade or so has a game total been lined 8.5, and for 2000's 6-3 game to have paid out on Over that's what it would've needed to be). So since '95 its U/O 9-5 excluding 1 year that suspiciously looks like another Under result (that obviously would make for U/O 10-4). From '84-'94 its either U/O 7-4 or 8-3 (depending on '89's line for an 8 run game, another likely Under), meaning from '84 it's either 16-9 or (more likely) 17-8, excluding the likely Under from 2000.
If any correction is coming, it's back to Overs, since Unders have clearly dominated since 1984.![]()
Dont know where you're getting your lines from, but since 2001 its U/O 5-4, and from '95-'99 is was U/O 4-1 (I can't find a line for 2000's game, but rarely in the last decade or so has a game total been lined 8.5, and for 2000's 6-3 game to have paid out on Over that's what it would've needed to be). So since '95 its U/O 9-5 excluding 1 year that suspiciously looks like another Under result (that obviously would make for U/O 10-4). From '84-'94 its either U/O 7-4 or 8-3 (depending on '89's line for an 8 run game, another likely Under), meaning from '84 it's either 16-9 or (more likely) 17-8, excluding the likely Under from 2000.
If any correction is coming, it's back to Overs, since Unders have clearly dominated since 1984.![]()
This is exactly what the books want you to think!!! I will be on the OVER!!!![]()
That OVER isn't looking that good.
This is exactly what the books want you to think!!! I will be on the OVER!!!![]()
That OVER isn't looking that good.
I don't care who is up there batting against guys like Jimenez, Hudson, Johnson, Halladay, Wainright and Carpenter. These guys are too good and when someone different is pitching each inning it's almost impossible to adjust.
Seems like a 3-2 type game to me.
I don't care who is up there batting against guys like Jimenez, Hudson, Johnson, Halladay, Wainright and Carpenter. These guys are too good and when someone different is pitching each inning it's almost impossible to adjust.
Seems like a 3-2 type game to me.
Hot Forum Topics
-
🤢🥴💩_ Fubah's risky baseball bets _🥶😲🥵
447,694
-
🏈🏈🏈 Fubah2's risky CFB bets
257,374
-
Couple Beers
3,935
-
PART DEUX
289
-
Tuesday 09/15/2026
648
-
Tuesday
3,185
-
Wednesday 09/16/2026
360
-
Trump lies so much.
20,693
-
What damage to America does the traitor and his party plan for the rest of the year.?
25,639
-
Another looney Trump comment today.
11,557
Warning - External Link
Report User
This post is spam
Delete Post
Remove Thread
Scan Results
Login/Register
Accounts are free and easy to create.
Search
