OVERALL RECORD: 39-22 (63.9%) --- UNITS: +16.78u
*All 1u flat bets
Rangers/Marlins OV 7.5 +108
Cubs ML -108 (GAME 1)
Cubs RL (+1.5) -202 (GAME 1)
OVERALL RECORD: 39-22 (63.9%) --- UNITS: +16.78u
*All 1u flat bets
Rangers/Marlins OV 7.5 +108
Cubs ML -108 (GAME 1)
Cubs RL (+1.5) -202 (GAME 1)
OVERALL RECORD: 39-22 (63.9%) --- UNITS: +16.78u
*All 1u flat bets
Rangers/Marlins OV 7.5 +108
Cubs ML -108 (GAME 1)
Cubs RL (+1.5) -202 (GAME 1)
Opinions are definitely welcome. I tend to disagree with that logic when it comes to focusing on +EV matchups. I do agree with that logic when it comes to the standard sports bettor. The more games they bet, the more likely they will lose long-term.
Opinions are definitely welcome. I tend to disagree with that logic when it comes to focusing on +EV matchups. I do agree with that logic when it comes to the standard sports bettor. The more games they bet, the more likely they will lose long-term.
@archtown
Marlins over has a +EV today in the model. Not an EV that is going to blow you away but puts it in the criteria as a play by the model.
@archtown
Marlins over has a +EV today in the model. Not an EV that is going to blow you away but puts it in the criteria as a play by the model.
@Fire1998
It does not. There are a handful of skip games every day. If the +EV doesn't reach the playable threshold, the plays are skips.
@Fire1998
It does not. There are a handful of skip games every day. If the +EV doesn't reach the playable threshold, the plays are skips.
@archtown
Very well expected. There is no perfect model. I have other models that run in the background that agree and disagree on certain plays. It happens. No model is hitting 100% of the time.
@archtown
Very well expected. There is no perfect model. I have other models that run in the background that agree and disagree on certain plays. It happens. No model is hitting 100% of the time.
@wantwinners
Actually very much not the case. Really depends on someone’s bankroll. Based on your $250-1k comment, we seem to run in very different circles when it comes to sports betting and that’s ok. I’m just posting for the love of the game. Have had other profitable models that I wasn’t allowed to go public on. This one I can. So I thought I would post. If you don’t like the model, that’s cool.
@wantwinners
Actually very much not the case. Really depends on someone’s bankroll. Based on your $250-1k comment, we seem to run in very different circles when it comes to sports betting and that’s ok. I’m just posting for the love of the game. Have had other profitable models that I wasn’t allowed to go public on. This one I can. So I thought I would post. If you don’t like the model, that’s cool.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.