Posted:
#51
Jericho has put over soooooo many young guys and stars over the years...why not fandango???
0
Wrestlemania Lines
Posted:
#52
I don't see why Rhode Scholars and Bellas are +350. They should be closer to even. Some heels need to win as someone said. Have to figure Cena, Taker, maybe HHH are locks. ADR a pretty decent favorite. Miz a favorite. Team Hell No a favorite.
So odds on heels winning are: Fandango and Shield and that's it. 9 total matches, 7 good guys winning? I don't see it happening. I think a bad guy has to go over in one of the 4 big matches- the WHC match being the 4th. I also heard the rumor that Ziggler-Team Hell No is opening the ppv. No WHC like in previous years when good guys won the match.
Maybe throw a bet on Swagger and Lesnar, and Rhodes Scholars.
So odds on heels winning are: Fandango and Shield and that's it. 9 total matches, 7 good guys winning? I don't see it happening. I think a bad guy has to go over in one of the 4 big matches- the WHC match being the 4th. I also heard the rumor that Ziggler-Team Hell No is opening the ppv. No WHC like in previous years when good guys won the match.
Maybe throw a bet on Swagger and Lesnar, and Rhodes Scholars.
0
Posted:
#54
Sadly there's no value in parlays here. It took 11 spots to give me a 2.7 return off a unit and I had to involve UFC and high NBA/NCAA moneylines. Ended up losing one of the UFC plays so it's besides the point.
I hate having my money tied up so I fucked myself. I refuse to take underdogs because they "could" win. I've done that once in the Elimination Chamber and refuse to do it again. No reason to waste money on Punk, Lesnar, Rock, Jericho etc. when you know they're going to lose just because the return looks good. The only way those win is, literally, if the ref botches the outcome. And even then, I'm sure they have some sort of backup plan to restart a match if it's a high calibur one.
Ryback/Henry has been going back and fourth since the start. Nice line on Ryback now but why has it gone so far back down?
Remember when Hell No was dogs? Woulda been nice to take them.
So confused on why they have Tons of Funk winning this match. At least that's what the -1050 line indicates. With all the faces set to win why not throw these heels a bone? Especially considering they JUST started the storyline with the Bellas. Might as well make them look strong unless they plan to split them...AGAIN.
That's the one thing that scares me about Wrestlemania. Because of reasons like year's past with Miz and the countout, restart and win. Lawler with the win then reversed call. And Punk beating Rock with the reverse call (even though that could have been seen a mile away). Not sure when these will come into play.
Faces:
Cena (semi-heel considering the fan base)
ADR
Triple H
Taker
Ryback
Hell No
Cena (semi-heel considering the fan base)
ADR
Triple H
Taker
Ryback
Hell No
Miz
Tons of Funk
Heels:
Shield
Fandango
Fandango
Ziggler (if he cashes would be one of the biggest pops of the night, though)
So looking at lines...that's 2 heels winning with Cena being the exception. There's got to be a catch somewhere.
0
Posted:
#55
https://www.covers.com/articles/articles.aspx?theArt=314393
"You heard it here first, C.M. Punk defeats The Undertaker and destroys his 20-0 record." 
Someone got paid for that article?
0
Posted:
#59
Quote Originally Posted by speak2truth:
Don't understand the whole Fandango thing at all. He appears to be nothing but a dancing closet fruit, with no wrestling appeal--no charisma, no aerial attacks, no super strength, nothing.
I predict he will be out of WWF by next year.
Maybe...but he's Vince's "pet project". He's not just an ordinary new guy...Vince has big plans for him.
0
Posted:
#60
Quote Originally Posted by KittyKatz286:
Can someone explain why Mark Henry is -1700 now? Yet you all seem to think Ryback is a lock.
Can someone explain why Mark Henry is -1700 now? Yet you all seem to think Ryback is a lock.
Kapono must have hit it on the head, then. With his time in WWE running up...this may be his "Wrestlemania Moment". Can't imagine where they go with a storyline having Henry win and Ryback lose but the line indicates it will work that way.
0
Posted:
#64
Quote Originally Posted by speak2truth:
Don't understand the whole Fandango thing at all. He appears to be nothing but a dancing closet fruit, with no wrestling appeal--no charisma, no aerial attacks, no super strength, nothing.
I predict he will be out of WWF by next year.
There is no way that Vince prevents this guy from actually wrestling for almost a month from the "I won't wrestle until you say my name right" gimmick; only to have him lose in WM.
Only time will tell how much in ring presence he will have enough to sustain his longevity in the WWE. But for at least tonight, he will win this match. 
0
Posted:
#72
Quote Originally Posted by Osirus13:
what is the difference of initial ruling or end of broadcast ruling
what is the difference of initial ruling or end of broadcast ruling
I dunno if you saw but this came into play at the rumble with Rock and Punk.
Punk cheated and won the match. So initial ruling Punk wins. Then I think it was vince that came out and they restarted the match and then Rock won. So initial ruling bettors hit on Punk. But when the broadcast ended, Rock was the winner.
0
Hot Forum Topics
