Posted:
#26
Quote Originally Posted by esplanade:
Decent efforts but incorrect. Suppose you went from $5 to $240, your return would have been 4800%, and you dug yourself out of a deeper hole, so in theory your return was greater than in the first case. The -$91 is important to establish how much you increased the balance of your account, but it is in no way your basis (meaning that it is not the denominator in the computation). Those efforts were just silly. To make a meaningful computation, one would have to know your average stake.
To further point out how ridiculous the former computations were:
had you started at -50, these guys would have quoted you a higher %.
Decent efforts but incorrect. Suppose you went from $5 to $240, your return would have been 4800%, and you dug yourself out of a deeper hole, so in theory your return was greater than in the first case. The -$91 is important to establish how much you increased the balance of your account, but it is in no way your basis (meaning that it is not the denominator in the computation). Those efforts were just silly. To make a meaningful computation, one would have to know your average stake.
To further point out how ridiculous the former computations were:
had you started at -50, these guys would have quoted you a higher %.
why do you always have to come across so insecure and condescending?
Now explain to me why club and raiders and the others were "Incorrect" and "Silly".....
I know I got your number and everything... but you think you could do it with out being all insecure and negative? Like get stifle your personal issues just enough to just talk math and numbers?
Please friend, this is your chance to show what you know with out the vitriol
0
Hot Forum Topics
