What do you like about A&M on the road?
What do you like about A&M on the road?
Good luck man, I love following your plays. I usually check your picks to confirm my thinking. If your on a different team I usually stay away. If your on the same team I smash the game like WV +10 last week.
I notice you had a lot of dogs last week. You think the lines are inlflated again. I feel a majority of them are this week.
Good luck man, I love following your plays. I usually check your picks to confirm my thinking. If your on a different team I usually stay away. If your on the same team I smash the game like WV +10 last week.
I notice you had a lot of dogs last week. You think the lines are inlflated again. I feel a majority of them are this week.
Good luck man, I love following your plays. I usually check your picks to confirm my thinking. If your on a different team I usually stay away. If your on the same team I smash the game like WV +10 last week.
I notice you had a lot of dogs last week. You think the lines are inlflated again. I feel a majority of them are this week.
Good luck man, I love following your plays. I usually check your picks to confirm my thinking. If your on a different team I usually stay away. If your on the same team I smash the game like WV +10 last week.
I notice you had a lot of dogs last week. You think the lines are inlflated again. I feel a majority of them are this week.
Nice to see you leaning Navy, surprised you are on Oregon. Is that a fade of the public?
I liked Wisconsin too when I first saw it. MSU is historically terrible ATS the week before the Michigan game. I just dont understand why the game is so low.
Nice to see you leaning Navy, surprised you are on Oregon. Is that a fade of the public?
I liked Wisconsin too when I first saw it. MSU is historically terrible ATS the week before the Michigan game. I just dont understand why the game is so low.
Oahu-
I have a play on every Texas A&M football and basketball game as I went there. I am trying to provide A&M plays the way LuDawg provides ECU plays, although I don't expect to have anywhere the success. Thus far, I am 3-0 on TAMU.
Anyways, I haven't locked anything in yet, but agree with you right now on +3. Having followed every game of the Sherman era, I am a little apprehensive as his team has typically struggled when playing on national television through 2+ years thus far. Hopefully this year is different.
One other play I am looking at is the under 66 points. The new DC at A&M, Tim DeRuyter (formerly from Air Force) has the boys playing night and day better than last year. Granted the competition has been poor, but the defense has looked much more fundamentally sound than anytime since R.C. Slocum was there. You might have known this, but FIU returned one INT for a TD and another INT to the one yard line. So, basically, FIU got 14 of its 20 points by gaining one yard on offense.
Another reason I like the under is the strength of both offenses is the ground game. I expect both teams to keep the clock moving. I would have expected the over/under to be around 59.5 points.
Anyways, nothing locked in yet, but my two cents.
Oahu-
I have a play on every Texas A&M football and basketball game as I went there. I am trying to provide A&M plays the way LuDawg provides ECU plays, although I don't expect to have anywhere the success. Thus far, I am 3-0 on TAMU.
Anyways, I haven't locked anything in yet, but agree with you right now on +3. Having followed every game of the Sherman era, I am a little apprehensive as his team has typically struggled when playing on national television through 2+ years thus far. Hopefully this year is different.
One other play I am looking at is the under 66 points. The new DC at A&M, Tim DeRuyter (formerly from Air Force) has the boys playing night and day better than last year. Granted the competition has been poor, but the defense has looked much more fundamentally sound than anytime since R.C. Slocum was there. You might have known this, but FIU returned one INT for a TD and another INT to the one yard line. So, basically, FIU got 14 of its 20 points by gaining one yard on offense.
Another reason I like the under is the strength of both offenses is the ground game. I expect both teams to keep the clock moving. I would have expected the over/under to be around 59.5 points.
Anyways, nothing locked in yet, but my two cents.
Nice to see you leaning Navy, surprised you are on Oregon. Is that a fade of the public?
I liked Wisconsin too when I first saw it. MSU is historically terrible ATS the week before the Michigan game. I just dont understand why the game is so low.
Nice to see you leaning Navy, surprised you are on Oregon. Is that a fade of the public?
I liked Wisconsin too when I first saw it. MSU is historically terrible ATS the week before the Michigan game. I just dont understand why the game is so low.
Oahu-
I have a play on every Texas A&M football and basketball game as I went there. I am trying to provide A&M plays the way LuDawg provides ECU plays, although I don't expect to have anywhere the success. Thus far, I am 3-0 on TAMU.
Anyways, I haven't locked anything in yet, but agree with you right now on +3. Having followed every game of the Sherman era, I am a little apprehensive as his team has typically struggled when playing on national television through 2+ years thus far. Hopefully this year is different.
One other play I am looking at is the under 66 points. The new DC at A&M, Tim DeRuyter (formerly from Air Force) has the boys playing night and day better than last year. Granted the competition has been poor, but the defense has looked much more fundamentally sound than anytime since R.C. Slocum was there. You might have known this, but FIU returned one INT for a TD and another INT to the one yard line. So, basically, FIU got 14 of its 20 points by gaining one yard on offense.
Another reason I like the under is the strength of both offenses is the ground game. I expect both teams to keep the clock moving. I would have expected the over/under to be around 59.5 points.
Anyways, nothing locked in yet, but my two cents.
Oahu-
I have a play on every Texas A&M football and basketball game as I went there. I am trying to provide A&M plays the way LuDawg provides ECU plays, although I don't expect to have anywhere the success. Thus far, I am 3-0 on TAMU.
Anyways, I haven't locked anything in yet, but agree with you right now on +3. Having followed every game of the Sherman era, I am a little apprehensive as his team has typically struggled when playing on national television through 2+ years thus far. Hopefully this year is different.
One other play I am looking at is the under 66 points. The new DC at A&M, Tim DeRuyter (formerly from Air Force) has the boys playing night and day better than last year. Granted the competition has been poor, but the defense has looked much more fundamentally sound than anytime since R.C. Slocum was there. You might have known this, but FIU returned one INT for a TD and another INT to the one yard line. So, basically, FIU got 14 of its 20 points by gaining one yard on offense.
Another reason I like the under is the strength of both offenses is the ground game. I expect both teams to keep the clock moving. I would have expected the over/under to be around 59.5 points.
Anyways, nothing locked in yet, but my two cents.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.