I’ll go the other way
I’ll take the team that pounded BC by 30 last year .
34-17 Kinda game
Louisville -4 1st half
Game -7
![]()
@MrHouse
The idea of fading the "public" based on the majority here at Covers used to be somewhat successful.
However, this no longer works because Covers is no longer what it used to be.
Once upon of time you would have thousands of posters and those interacting and posted picks would be 20-30+ pages deep for the current day.
Now, a good day for Covers is 2-3 pages deep.
Above is from another thread last night what I posted about the perception of BC being the "public" darling.
And posted that sources of mine inside a few major sports books confirmed that the action was pretty much split down the middle with a slight tilt to Louisville.
Never trust "public percentages" through public forums or through public websites, especially those who have a vested interest in seeing you lose, which is most.
@MrHouse
The idea of fading the "public" based on the majority here at Covers used to be somewhat successful.
However, this no longer works because Covers is no longer what it used to be.
Once upon of time you would have thousands of posters and those interacting and posted picks would be 20-30+ pages deep for the current day.
Now, a good day for Covers is 2-3 pages deep.
Above is from another thread last night what I posted about the perception of BC being the "public" darling.
And posted that sources of mine inside a few major sports books confirmed that the action was pretty much split down the middle with a slight tilt to Louisville.
Never trust "public percentages" through public forums or through public websites, especially those who have a vested interest in seeing you lose, which is most.
