All Forums | College Football

***OFFICIAL Stan/Va Tech in game thread***

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 14832
Posts: 779
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2007
Posts: 14861
Posted: #626
OK we need another quick 7!!!
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2008
Posts: 8138
Posted: #627
Step on thier throat now Stanford
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2008
Posts: 37789
Posted: #628

Current live line... V-Tech +13.5 +100 vs. STAN -13.5 -140; total 55.5; no ML this time.

 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2008
Posts: 13028
Posted: #629
Quote Originally Posted by Rikimaru:

Vtech is a good team so is Stanford, watching this makes me feel that Boise deserves to be a top 5 team in the nation.

They are......and making them play Utah was the worst slap in the face possible!!!!
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2010
Posts: 3634
Posted: #630
Quote Originally Posted by jennado:

Is the Stan secondary horrible or what?  Being in the PAC10, they see passing teams all the time.  Why can VT WRs keep getting so open on long yardage plays?


They underestimated the touch Tyrod can throw with. It looks like this was the gameplan all along. Give some holes on long throws and bait him into it, thinking we'll get some ints or he will just overthrow the guy
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2008
Posts: 37789
Posted: #631
Quote Originally Posted by jennado:

Let me try this again.......

I dont see Stanford going 90yds for a score.  I see a typical 2 - 3 1st down drive, and eat up about 5mins off the clock. 

I hope it works again!

 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2007
Posts: 14861
Posted: #632

Quote Originally Posted by jesron1269:

Current live line... V-Tech +13.5 -115 vs. STAN +13.5 -125 and V-Tech +750 vs. STAN -2000 in the ML.  No total given (which has to be good for the over).

YO jesron, Im gonna have to visit with you on understanding these ML's! I am old school and had a local that just had sides totals and parlays untiljust a few years ago!

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2008
Posts: 1696
Posted: #633

It's always a hole on the left

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2010
Posts: 181
Posted: #634
OH MY GOD!
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2008
Posts: 37789
Posted: #635
Quote Originally Posted by iuryan:

I dont bet live line as I am with local.. I would think one would pound V-Tech +13.5??? I am a Stanford backer but i dont see a 14 point final margin...

If STAN gets up 3 TDs I will put some money on V-Tech because I could see a garbage TD or two by V-Tech in the 4th Q.  Lets get another TD first STAN!

 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2008
Posts: 13028
Posted: #636

Nice play!!!

 

Onto the 4th Q

 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2007
Posts: 14861
Posted: #637
Great throw LUCK!!!!!
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2004
Posts: 28383
Posted: #638
what a catch
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2007
Posts: 2415
Posted: #639
fucking kidding me
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2005
Posts: 41476
Posted: #640
WHat a first down!!
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2007
Posts: 14861
Posted: #641
Im digginnnn this!!!
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2008
Posts: 37789
Posted: #642
Quote Originally Posted by PGram13:

YO jesron, Im gonna have to visit with you on understanding these ML's! I am old school and had a local that just had sides totals and parlays untiljust a few years ago!

I am not making up these lines... this is per betus FYI.  BOL!

 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2010
Posts: 507
Posted: #643

Quote Originally Posted by helmstetter21:

They are......and making them play Utah was the worst slap in the face possible!!!!

They should have at least got to play a top 15 team....maybe Okalahoma and Boise was much better then Okalahoma and Uconn?  Uconn shoulda played Utah.

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2007
Posts: 2415
Posted: #644
vtech looks like shit
 
MVP
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2007
Posts: 15772
Posted: #645
embarassing them
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2007
Posts: 14861
Posted: #646
Quote Originally Posted by jesron1269:

I am not making up these lines... this is per betus FYI.  BOL!

OH I know KOOL! I have BETUS also! Im a quick study too!

 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2008
Posts: 8138
Posted: #647
I agree with u Jerson. I wish my site had live betting. They used to have it but took it off.
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2008
Posts: 13028
Posted: #648
Quote Originally Posted by Rikimaru:

They should have at least got to play a top 15 team....maybe Okalahoma and Boise was much better then Okalahoma and Uconn?  Uconn shoulda played Utah.

I would have loved to see Boise St play Oklahoma St instead of Zona who sucks!!!!
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2007
Posts: 14861
Posted: #649

YO JES!  Im always sincere with my comments my friend!

 
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2008
Posts: 37789
Posted: #650
Current live line is V-Tech +14.5 -145 vs. STAN -14.5 +105.  BOL!
All Forums | College Football
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gambling
Betting Sites
US Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Ultimate Race
Office Pools
The Covers community has
810,221
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 30 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
21+
Gambling problem? Call 1-800-GAMBLER
Help Privacy Terms of Service Cookies Sitemap Forum
Covers is verified safe by:
Evalon Logo Logo GPWA Logo GDPR logo Logo GeoTrust logo Logo PCI DSS logo Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2026 CS Media Ltd. All Rights Reserved.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.