All Forums | College Basketball

Wisconsin at Syracuse (03/22/2012)

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 5050
Posts: 26
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2002
Posts: 61
Posted: #1

Away:  Wisconsin [18-14 ATS]
Home:  Syracuse [18-16 ATS]

Game Time: 7:15 PM
Stadium: TD Garden

Recent Meetings:
11/13/99 - WISC 49 vs. SYR 68

Team Leaders:

Wisconsin:
Points: Jordan Taylor (14.7)
Assists: Jordan Taylor (4.0)
Rebounds: Ryan Evans (6.8)

Syracuse:
Points: Kris Joseph (13.7)
Assists: Scoop Jardine (4.9)
Rebounds: Fab Melo (5.8)

More:
Live Odds
In-Depth Matchup Information
Consensus Betting Information

 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2006
Posts: 25004
Posted: #2

Maybe not so much Montana, but that win over Vandy got the Badgers primed for this one tonight.. On the flip side the Orange had an easy time with Ashville & K-State, two teams that did not match-up physically with them. I'm liking the 3.5 here because the Badgers are one Big 10 team that can play Big East basketball. The loss of Melo is about to rear it's ugly head.

Wisconsin - 68                                   Syracuse - 63

Badgers +3.5                              over 120.5

Badgers in a non-conference dog situation

Wisconsin - Over

 

 

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2008
Posts: 378
Posted: #3
Hey Jim- I've been coming to this site for years now...and I've got to be honest with you- I fade you any time I manage to come across one of your posts. 
I'm convinced you're not actually putting money on your games because if you did- you would have gone broke years ago- Hence you wouldn't bother to post your comments anymore.

So- if my theory is correct- that would mean that you're probably somehow affiliated with covers.com and you're just offering inverted picks from someone with good information in order to persuade people who are actually putting money on these games. But why in the world would you do that???

Well here's why::::by giving incorrect picks- maybe in some way covers.com is making money off people who lose $ after signing up for at a gambling site through this website. [aka affiliate networking with added incentives]

Give it up either way- you're worthless

"CUSE to cover the number-
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2007
Posts: 825
Posted: #4
BUSTED! 
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2006
Posts: 40
Posted: #5
cuse-3.5, the more talented team wins by 9, 71-62
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2007
Posts: 710
Posted: #6
Syracuse by 1
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jun, 2007
Posts: 1213
Posted: #7
Quote Originally Posted by BuffaloBill5:

Hey Jim- I've been coming to this site for years now...and I've got to be honest with you- I fade you any time I manage to come across one of your posts. 
I'm convinced you're not actually putting money on your games because if you did- you would have gone broke years ago- Hence you wouldn't bother to post your comments anymore.

So- if my theory is correct- that would mean that you're probably somehow affiliated with covers.com and you're just offering inverted picks from someone with good information in order to persuade people who are actually putting money on these games. But why in the world would you do that???

Well here's why::::by giving incorrect picks- maybe in some way covers.com is making money off people who lose $ after signing up for at a gambling site through this website. [aka affiliate networking with added incentives]

Give it up either way- you're worthless

"CUSE to cover the number-

Might I also add the fact that ColonelJim obviously didn't watch the Ashville game..."easy time"??...that game, in fact was so close, it apparently scared them straight enough to wake up and beat down KState...they will win and cover this game...GLTA
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2010
Posts: 1708
Posted: #8
Quote Originally Posted by BuffaloBill5:

Hey Jim- I've been coming to this site for years now...and I've got to be honest with you- I fade you any time I manage to come across one of your posts. 
I'm convinced you're not actually putting money on your games because if you did- you would have gone broke years ago- Hence you wouldn't bother to post your comments anymore.

So- if my theory is correct- that would mean that you're probably somehow affiliated with covers.com and you're just offering inverted picks from someone with good information in order to persuade people who are actually putting money on these games. But why in the world would you do that???

Well here's why::::by giving incorrect picks- maybe in some way covers.com is making money off people who lose $ after signing up for at a gambling site through this website. [aka affiliate networking with added incentives]

Give it up either way- you're worthless

"CUSE to cover the number-
I'm not reading into anything here ! But there is one thing you said that does ring true for me........ and that's the fact that colonal  jim is a terrible handicapper !!!!!!!!!!!!

The problem here is that he might actually be right on this one !!!!!!!

 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2009
Posts: 12718
Posted: #9
Quote Originally Posted by BuffaloBill5:

Hey Jim- I've been coming to this site for years now...and I've got to be honest with you- I fade you any time I manage to come across one of your posts. 
I'm convinced you're not actually putting money on your games because if you did- you would have gone broke years ago- Hence you wouldn't bother to post your comments anymore.

So- if my theory is correct- that would mean that you're probably somehow affiliated with covers.com and you're just offering inverted picks from someone with good information in order to persuade people who are actually putting money on these games. But why in the world would you do that???

Well here's why::::by giving incorrect picks- maybe in some way covers.com is making money off people who lose $ after signing up for at a gambling site through this website. [aka affiliate networking with added incentives]

Give it up either way- you're worthless

"CUSE to cover the number-


agree

the COl

is a bag of shiet
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2012
Posts: 324
Posted: #10
Coloneljim might not be the best handicapper but he offers his picks everyday so people should really worry about theirselfs. You fucks act like anybody wins at this shit. Buffalomouth put your picks out everyday and lets tally up your record hard ass.
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2007
Posts: 264
Posted: #11
Quote Originally Posted by OBI:

Coloneljim might not be the best handicapper but he offers his picks everyday so people should really worry about theirselfs. You fucks act like anybody wins at this shit. Buffalomouth put your picks out everyday and lets tally up your record hard ass.


I agree 100%.  I love reading Coloneljims posts.  Sometimes I agree and sometimes I disagree (I like SU today).  Isn't that what the site is for?  Who cares what his motive is.  Ultimately, you have to make your own decision.  Good luck everyone
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2005
Posts: 9698
Posted: #12
I love reading Jims post and have for years
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2011
Posts: 10
Posted: #13
i just like to say i think the only one that buys into col jims bullshit is col jim.
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2005
Posts: 153
Posted: #14
MALUKE IS RIGHT, ANYONE THAT IS PERSUADED BY SOMEONES PICKS ON THIS SIGHT IS A MORON. TAKE IT FOR WHAT IT IS AND MAKE YOUR CALL. I LIKE THE POINTS.
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2009
Posts: 348
Posted: #15

1H @ 105 has been money all year!

 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2007
Posts: 10502
Posted: #16
Quote Originally Posted by OBI:

Coloneljim might not be the best handicapper but he offers his picks everyday so people should really worry about theirselfs. You fucks act like anybody wins at this shit. Buffalomouth put your picks out everyday and lets tally up your record hard ass.




 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jun, 2007
Posts: 20
Posted: #17
I've been coming to site for years and am always interested in the threads for each game.  I have wondered the same thing about some of these posters.   In the end though it's your call and your money.  Sometimes the advice is useful and sometimes it isn't but in the end it's your choice what you play.   

Cuse will win this game in the end by 4 doing it a free throw line.   Waiters will have a big game.   Taylor will not be able to guard and keep up with him.
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2008
Posts: 482
Posted: #18
CUSE GOT THIS GAME NO DOUBT 
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2006
Posts: 514
Posted: #19
THE COLONEL HAS BEEN MY FRIEND SINCE I JOINED THIS HALF - ASSED DRAMA STYLE FORUM  WHERE EVERYONE GIVES IT TO ANYONE AND LOUND MOUTHS AND WHAT NOT.  WE ALL WANT TO WIN,  NO  ..  SO WE ALL SHOULD HELP EACH OTHER ,  FOR I RESPECT HIS OPINION . 
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2010
Posts: 1708
Posted: #20
Thanks for all you do for us colonaljim  !!!!!!!

These guys are right , the fact that he loses more than he wins just means he's like the rest of us Degenerate losers !!!!!!


 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jun, 2007
Posts: 1213
Posted: #21
Sigh...I, for one, was simply pointing out bad info that Jim was giving...and mistake or not, it happens often when he posts and can be mis leading, take it as you will, wether one is on his side or not...personally I don't give a shit, and tend to do my own thing...GLTA
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2008
Posts: 657
Posted: #22
Quote Originally Posted by BuffaloBill5:

Hey Jim- I've been coming to this site for years now...and I've got to be honest with you- I fade you any time I manage to come across one of your posts. 
I'm convinced you're not actually putting money on your games because if you did- you would have gone broke years ago- Hence you wouldn't bother to post your comments anymore.

So- if my theory is correct- that would mean that you're probably somehow affiliated with covers.com and you're just offering inverted picks from someone with good information in order to persuade people who are actually putting money on these games. But why in the world would you do that???

Well here's why::::by giving incorrect picks- maybe in some way covers.com is making money off people who lose $ after signing up for at a gambling site through this website. [aka affiliate networking with added incentives]

Give it up either way- you're worthless

"CUSE to cover the number-

The most retarded thing I have heard of in a long time...what a stupid post ! 
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2007
Posts: 400
Posted: #23
Quote Originally Posted by tileman999:

MALUKE IS RIGHT, ANYONE THAT IS PERSUADED BY SOMEONES PICKS ON THIS SIGHT IS A MORON. TAKE IT FOR WHAT IT IS AND MAKE YOUR CALL. I LIKE THE POINTS.

Haha this might be the most idiotic post I have ever read. The fact that you are stating you have never been influenced or persuaded is just retarded. Why are you on hear reading what other people have to say then? If you have gambled for more than a month you would never make that statement. At one time or another someone will always be persuaded. You are not billy walters, and even he has multiple people who give him certain factors to look at in a game

There are two things I KNOW that will happen in this game. 

1. Cuse will run a zone.
2. Wis will slow it down.

That being said, it will make this game VERY difficult to go over and also make 3.5 pts seem like a lot more. 

Wisc +3.5
Wisc un 120
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2009
Posts: 6735
Posted: #24
Under seems to be too easy...
 
 
MVP
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2006
Posts: 19693
Posted: #25

Cant we all just focus on how lousy these announcers are?

Verne (I'm blotting out the Sun) Lundequist and Bill (Onions!) Rafferty are really horrible. I mean, I gotta turn the sound off.........

All Forums | College Basketball
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gambling
Betting Sites
US Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Ultimate Race
Office Pools
The Covers community has
810,221
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 30 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
21+
Gambling problem? Call 1-800-GAMBLER
Help Privacy Terms of Service Cookies Sitemap Forum
Covers is verified safe by:
Evalon Logo Logo GPWA Logo GDPR logo Logo GeoTrust logo Logo PCI DSS logo Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2026 CS Media Ltd. All Rights Reserved.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.