-10.5 was money with 1 point sold rather than 1.5 bought. Seems like the better option, no?
-10.5 was money with 1 point sold rather than 1.5 bought. Seems like the better option, no?
You need to not be kidding me they were upnpijts h 6 minutes left the odds of them covering a 9.5 had got to be 150-1 minimum especially bc how good they were playing. They literally scored like a point after Zion went out that’s a horrible beat.
You need to not be kidding me they were upnpijts h 6 minutes left the odds of them covering a 9.5 had got to be 150-1 minimum especially bc how good they were playing. They literally scored like a point after Zion went out that’s a horrible beat.
Horrible beat is an understatement. Fkn Joke!!!!
Horrible beat is an understatement. Fkn Joke!!!!
yes buying hook is always better.
But I always buy 1.5 at -140 in almost every bet I make on spread. Got burned too many times early in betting career losing by hook and made this a habit. Even though I pay more juice, more often than not I win than lose with 1.5 points and sometimes push. Better than losing.
yes buying hook is always better.
But I always buy 1.5 at -140 in almost every bet I make on spread. Got burned too many times early in betting career losing by hook and made this a habit. Even though I pay more juice, more often than not I win than lose with 1.5 points and sometimes push. Better than losing.
No, if you think you need to buy 1.5 to 2 points, you should be playing the other side.
No, if you think you need to buy 1.5 to 2 points, you should be playing the other side.
Honestly I apologize to everybody had any real money on this game, I’m so unlucky lately and losing in every aspect of life I apologize boys it’s on me.
Honestly I apologize to everybody had any real money on this game, I’m so unlucky lately and losing in every aspect of life I apologize boys it’s on me.
Its not about the need. Its about the safety buffer. Tech is still the play I liked and added points to be more safe.
They should've covered 10.5 comfortably, but Duke went on 15-2 run. I shouldve played Duke -9 instead? it was winner but Duke was never my lean.
Its not about the need. Its about the safety buffer. Tech is still the play I liked and added points to be more safe.
They should've covered 10.5 comfortably, but Duke went on 15-2 run. I shouldve played Duke -9 instead? it was winner but Duke was never my lean.
Some clowns just cant catch a break...life is so unfair
Some clowns just cant catch a break...life is so unfair
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.