Posted:
#426
All that I know I went 4-14 and not 2-4, you can look at it your way all day. I guess that you speak for Ryno when you say that theres no plays tomorrow !!!
0
rabid dogs for feb
Posted:
#429
Quote Originally Posted by VITS:
All that I know I went 4-14 and not 2-4, you can look at it your way all day. I guess that you speak for Ryno when you say that theres no plays tomorrow !!!
All that I know I went 4-14 and not 2-4, you can look at it your way all day. I guess that you speak for Ryno when you say that theres no plays tomorrow !!!
I dont know how you got 4-14 or 2-4. Cuz i got 2-3. Either way its been a bad few days and i lost a ton of money this week and last. But you lose some and win some - up to us to tail or fade. If you wanna girl about it - make your own system that is proven to be successful. Not trying to bash anybody - I just want to win some money back! So either tail or fade.
GL Ryno-hope you come back strong bro - need to seriously win some money back. 
0
Posted:
#430
NORTH DAKOTA-JACKSONVILLE ST-SAMFORD-NEBRASKA OMAHA-PORTLAND ST-PENN , that's 6 plays and if you play them at half, money line and the regular spread it adds to 3 plays for each team and if you times by 6 , it's 18 plays and not 5 !!!!!!!!!!!!!
And if you read my posts I'm not complaining because with Ryno and his system I've won more then I lost .
Once again, I'm going to repeat that Ryno has done a fantastic job and I thank him for that. This is the end of this mix up, I will no longer speak about it.
Good luck to all.
0
Posted:
#431
Quote Originally Posted by ryno23:
updated record: full game 4-2
first halfs 3-3
money line dogs 3-2
personal plays: full game- 3-0
first halfs 3-0
moneylines- 2-1
ok guys, i decided to add penn to our updated record as i didn't play but im sure some of you do...after all we got to look good huh? :)
anyways..i also started to post my personal plays since they have been $$$ i usually pick and choose there.
plays today:
north Dakota +10
samford +8.5
neb Omaha +8
jaxsonville +7
Portland state +7.5
for newbies we play first half, full game and moneyline- flat bet.
also..north Dakota st was kp 174 and opened giving south Dakota +9 ...you might like it or not but gray area called 'almost'
st perters opened 6.5 and is down to +5.5 for Fairfield...another 'almost' play on Fairfield.. im not sure what ill do with those two as north Dakota state has benn playing real well. and i like both Fairfield and st peters as teams.
personal plays will be up soon.
gl guys....ill be around all day hangin with my dogs and collecting cash...ryno
hahah relax bro - wasn't trying to bash you or nebody. my question to you was about the record. i dont see penn on here unless it was on separate. that ml half play - ive seen it all over the post that it isnt a system play - but watevers have a beer
0
Posted:
#436
good morning guys... tough night to say the least.... 2wins 4 losses..as penn was posted separately as someone made it clear to me it was a play when ivys came out.
I will go to first post of pre system to clarify what is actually a system play. tdh has it right and knows system as well as me. first halfs and mls are not part of system. it only is a big deal now as they haven't done well this week.
I HAVE STATED THIS ON NUMEROUS OCCASIONS AND PRIVATE EMAILS AS TO WHAT IS A SYSTEM PLAY.
go back and read the thread.. no plays today that fir... ill be back for recap and discussion...ryno
0
Posted:
#437
updated record: full game 6-6
first halfs 3-7
money line dogs 4-7
guys, here is an updated record after yesterdays beat: as I have stated before throughout..the first halfs and moneyline plays are NOT part of system. norcal started playing them as he saw them hitting at a real good clip. (as did I) if you money manage you aren't down that much.
the pre system- well I stated the same thing there. first halfs and money lines weren't a part of it. I think the only mistake I made was posting for record purposes which gives you guys the notion that they are plays. so...going forward... I will list system plays with record only, I always said we will play 1st halfs and mls until they stop being profitable so I wont keep track of the records here for them ok?
unless you guys want me to track.
my personal plays- well I had a bad day yesterday. I honestly will tell you I hit 57% all year. nothing fancy.and I usually pick my spots...I wont post any 'likes' as I feel bad when I cost people money. I hate it enough when I lose let alone you guys. so...hang in there..lots of plays to go yet....gl ryno.
0
Posted:
#438
record:
full game 17-5=1
1st half 16-7
moneyline 8-15 ( 2 +400 hit and I +300 the rest were +240 or better.) bottom line profitable.
that's 73% with full game and first half combined. and just under 77% for full game only. the system is designed for full game only. but I think we can still play first halfs and money lines until they aren't profitable anymore.
so, going forward, we start new thread and new record. last year, the system flatted out a bit after pre. so beware. linesmakers constantly make adjustments and system will get unwanted eyes as posted before. so please, parameters do not need to be discussed in threads. also, any stupid questions should just be ignored. I or norcal can answer any questions in private message but since this is such a small window every year that it runs, just follow and win.
ill start new thread tonmorrow. great two weeks and lets hope for more winners.
id like to say ill enjoy the super bowl but I am scheduled to fly to vegas tomorrow am for some fun for the upcoming week and we are supposed to get dumped on with snow. lets hope they let me get out of here and on to sunny Nevada.
gl today..ill be around packing...ryno
this was stated by me at end of ;pre; system, hard to argue that fh and ml doesn't make sense to play them with the record they had but I did say these will flat out and were 50/50/ at best in previous years. even system tailed off last two years from pre. pre hit 77%. that is incredible. I don't know anyone who hits 77%
so for money management purposes I will not be playing first halfs or money lines anymore. i refuse to give back all my profit I made during pre system. gl guys...run this thread rampant today as we will have new one tomorrow...gl ryno
0
Posted:
#441
Quote Originally Posted by JEFFMARKETCAP:
Is it me or is the first half not a good idea? Seems like full game is the best bet. Also, I noticed when a team didn't cover the first half number, they seem to cover the second half line. Just an observation.
Is it me or is the first half not a good idea? Seems like full game is the best bet. Also, I noticed when a team didn't cover the first half number, they seem to cover the second half line. Just an observation.
no plays today. yes jeff I agree first half not part of system or good idea. its only a good idea when they win lol..that being said, I said it before about the first halfs hitting 50/50 at best and your observation on if they miss fh and will cover 2nd I believe to be the same..50/50..truly random..and has nothing to do with system. system up big for the year and we wont lose units betting fh or ml anymore...gl today ryno
0
Posted:
#445
This is one of the most questioned threads I;ve ever seen on this site. This man is just giving everyone his selections and its up to you to follow or not. The guy is not putting a gun to anyones head. To question and comment like this is just annoying and basically down right ignorant. Play the games or not its that simple.
0
Posted:
#446
Quote Originally Posted by jsab:
This is one of the most questioned threads I;ve ever seen on this site. This man is just giving everyone his selections and its up to you to follow or not. The guy is not putting a gun to anyones head. To question and comment like this is just annoying and basically down right ignorant. Play the games or not its that simple.
This is one of the most questioned threads I;ve ever seen on this site. This man is just giving everyone his selections and its up to you to follow or not. The guy is not putting a gun to anyones head. To question and comment like this is just annoying and basically down right ignorant. Play the games or not its that simple.
Fat, drunk, and stupid is no way to go through life, son.
0
Posted:
#447
I agree.
However, there are some losses for our dogs that the favorites have shot lights out. After doing some research on the losses, I saw the favs were shooting 65-70% on average against our plays. And in some other cases our dogs were out-of-rhythm on offense shooting 15-20% less than their season average.
All in all, this a very profitable system....best one I have seen. Its just that the opp. have been lights out and out dogs have been ice cold during that night/day.
However, there are some losses for our dogs that the favorites have shot lights out. After doing some research on the losses, I saw the favs were shooting 65-70% on average against our plays. And in some other cases our dogs were out-of-rhythm on offense shooting 15-20% less than their season average.
All in all, this a very profitable system....best one I have seen. Its just that the opp. have been lights out and out dogs have been ice cold during that night/day.
0
Posted:
#449
Quote Originally Posted by jsab:
This is one of the most questioned threads I;ve ever seen on this site. This man is just giving everyone his selections and its up to you to follow or not. The guy is not putting a gun to anyones head. To question and comment like this is just annoying and basically down right ignorant. Play the games or not its that simple.
This is one of the most questioned threads I;ve ever seen on this site. This man is just giving everyone his selections and its up to you to follow or not. The guy is not putting a gun to anyones head. To question and comment like this is just annoying and basically down right ignorant. Play the games or not its that simple.
BOL 
0
Posted:
#450
Quote Originally Posted by mp5070:
I agree.
However, there are some losses for our dogs that the favorites have shot lights out. After doing some research on the losses, I saw the favs were shooting 65-70% on average against our plays. And in some other cases our dogs were out-of-rhythm on offense shooting 15-20% less than their season average.
All in all, this a very profitable system....best one I have seen. Its just that the opp. have been lights out and out dogs have been ice cold during that night/day.
mp..I am well aware of what you just posted. thank you for the props...it is best system going and it will turn around after one bad day. I saw the shooting percentages but didn't make a big deal of it as im not an excuse maker but you are definitely right. I will point to one Saturday 2 yrs ago when we had 10 plays and 9 were losses.....we will have these..but overall we will be fine... no plays today but we will be on them Monday...gl bud ty ryno
I agree.
However, there are some losses for our dogs that the favorites have shot lights out. After doing some research on the losses, I saw the favs were shooting 65-70% on average against our plays. And in some other cases our dogs were out-of-rhythm on offense shooting 15-20% less than their season average.
All in all, this a very profitable system....best one I have seen. Its just that the opp. have been lights out and out dogs have been ice cold during that night/day.
0
Hot Forum Topics
