The system is easy, the research takes some time. Basically, for the month of November, I'm looking for disparities between opposing teams' top 7 scorers of a year ago. The more who return, the stronger that team will be early in the season. There must be a difference of at least 3 players between the two teams to make it a play. The larger the difference, the larger the play.
So far, the system is 3-1. For today Friday 10/12 : 6 plays
The system is easy, the research takes some time. Basically, for the month of November, I'm looking for disparities between opposing teams' top 7 scorers of a year ago. The more who return, the stronger that team will be early in the season. There must be a difference of at least 3 players between the two teams to make it a play. The larger the difference, the larger the play.
So far, the system is 3-1. For today Friday 10/12 : 6 plays
The system is easy, the research takes some time. Basically, for the month of November, I'm looking for disparities between opposing teams' top 7 scorers of a year ago. The more who return, the stronger that team will be early in the season. There must be a difference of at least 3 players between the two teams to make it a play. The larger the difference, the larger the play.
So far, the system is 3-1. For today Friday 10/12 : 6 plays
Virginia Commonwealth -19.5 2* ( 16 pt. win)
New Mexico State PK 2*
Nevada-Las Vegas -20.5 2*
Iona +3 1*
Chattanooga +22 1*
Pepperdine +7.5 1*
Good Luck to all
The system seems to be working just fine. 5-1 today (+480) 8-2 overall (+660)
The system is easy, the research takes some time. Basically, for the month of November, I'm looking for disparities between opposing teams' top 7 scorers of a year ago. The more who return, the stronger that team will be early in the season. There must be a difference of at least 3 players between the two teams to make it a play. The larger the difference, the larger the play.
So far, the system is 3-1. For today Friday 10/12 : 6 plays
Virginia Commonwealth -19.5 2* ( 16 pt. win)
New Mexico State PK 2*
Nevada-Las Vegas -20.5 2*
Iona +3 1*
Chattanooga +22 1*
Pepperdine +7.5 1*
Good Luck to all
The system seems to be working just fine. 5-1 today (+480) 8-2 overall (+660)
Might join you in the Hall. Was an initial lean, certainly a fade of Cornell is in order.
Will look into CLst, and and Fl atl once those come out.KP has CL -8, FLAT +7, but looks like that hasn't been adjusted based on this weekends results.
Might join you in the Hall. Was an initial lean, certainly a fade of Cornell is in order.
Will look into CLst, and and Fl atl once those come out.KP has CL -8, FLAT +7, but looks like that hasn't been adjusted based on this weekends results.
Been tracking your system all day. Looks very promising. The numbers in parentheses is the advantage of top 7 scorers returning). Based on your criteria, I'm leaning for tomorrow:
Hampton +13.5 (5-2) Alabama -19.5 (4-1) Pacific +4 (5-2) Santa Clara +11.5 (7-2) Pepperdine +19.5 (7-4)
Been tracking your system all day. Looks very promising. The numbers in parentheses is the advantage of top 7 scorers returning). Based on your criteria, I'm leaning for tomorrow:
Hampton +13.5 (5-2) Alabama -19.5 (4-1) Pacific +4 (5-2) Santa Clara +11.5 (7-2) Pepperdine +19.5 (7-4)
Post, and Getty. I was surprised to see pepperdine, as I have UCLA. But Pepperdine does return everyone so I see how it made your list. Still, they do stink, still.
I am also passing on Hampton as they also look to be worse, only returning 50% of their POINTS/offense from last season.
On Alabama, and you made me look at Pacific and Santa Clara.
Post, and Getty. I was surprised to see pepperdine, as I have UCLA. But Pepperdine does return everyone so I see how it made your list. Still, they do stink, still.
I am also passing on Hampton as they also look to be worse, only returning 50% of their POINTS/offense from last season.
On Alabama, and you made me look at Pacific and Santa Clara.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.