Question about taking the ball out of bounds. After a basket the other team can run the baseline to inbound the ball. ALL other situations is a spot. Player can only move his pivot foot. Correct? Seen twice now that on a spot throw in, the player chopped both feet and then actually took 2 steps. Should have been traveling. Correct? Thanks
0
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
Question about taking the ball out of bounds. After a basket the other team can run the baseline to inbound the ball. ALL other situations is a spot. Player can only move his pivot foot. Correct? Seen twice now that on a spot throw in, the player chopped both feet and then actually took 2 steps. Should have been traveling. Correct? Thanks
Question about taking the ball out of bounds. After a basket the other team can run the baseline to inbound the ball. ALL other situations is a spot. Player can only move his pivot foot. Correct? Seen twice now that on a spot throw in, the player chopped both feet and then actually took 2 steps. Should have been traveling. Correct? Thanks
Basically, yes. When inbounding the ball the inbounder has a 3' area in which he can move. He can jump and move his feet, but move outside the 3' imaginary semi-circle it is a simple violation (not traveling per se) ....thus a turnover.
So if that's what happened, the sideline ref either missed it or employed more latitude than dictated by the rules.
1
Quote Originally Posted by Buff47:
Question about taking the ball out of bounds. After a basket the other team can run the baseline to inbound the ball. ALL other situations is a spot. Player can only move his pivot foot. Correct? Seen twice now that on a spot throw in, the player chopped both feet and then actually took 2 steps. Should have been traveling. Correct? Thanks
Basically, yes. When inbounding the ball the inbounder has a 3' area in which he can move. He can jump and move his feet, but move outside the 3' imaginary semi-circle it is a simple violation (not traveling per se) ....thus a turnover.
So if that's what happened, the sideline ref either missed it or employed more latitude than dictated by the rules.
Quote Originally Posted by Buff47: Question about taking the ball out of bounds. After a basket the other team can run the baseline to inbound the ball. ALL other situations is a spot. Player can only move his pivot foot. Correct? Seen twice now that on a spot throw in, the player chopped both feet and then actually took 2 steps. Should have been traveling. Correct? Thanks Basically, yes. When inbounding the ball the inbounder has a 3' area in which he can move. He can jump and move his feet, but move outside the 3' imaginary semi-circle it is a simple violation (not traveling per se) ....thus a turnover. So if that's what happened, the sideline ref either missed it or employed more latitude than dictated by the rules.
PS. I haven't officiated since the early 90's (15 yrs a ref) but to my knowledge that rule has not changed, under NABC rules. FIBA (international) rules for inbounding differ only slightly.
0
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2:
Quote Originally Posted by Buff47: Question about taking the ball out of bounds. After a basket the other team can run the baseline to inbound the ball. ALL other situations is a spot. Player can only move his pivot foot. Correct? Seen twice now that on a spot throw in, the player chopped both feet and then actually took 2 steps. Should have been traveling. Correct? Thanks Basically, yes. When inbounding the ball the inbounder has a 3' area in which he can move. He can jump and move his feet, but move outside the 3' imaginary semi-circle it is a simple violation (not traveling per se) ....thus a turnover. So if that's what happened, the sideline ref either missed it or employed more latitude than dictated by the rules.
PS. I haven't officiated since the early 90's (15 yrs a ref) but to my knowledge that rule has not changed, under NABC rules. FIBA (international) rules for inbounding differ only slightly.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.