Posted:
#1251
lets make it back today. good luck today
0
3 picks 3 blowouts so far
Posted:
#1257
Love your picks but just curious with the dude above, Upshaw being dismissed from the team doesn't worry you a little about Washington? They seem to get rattled easily from the games that I've watched and losing the best shot blocker in the nation in Upshaw is a pretty big loss. Still gonna play it if you think it doesn't matter cause winning on the road in the pac 12 is usually difficult but just wondering what your take on that is.
0
Posted:
#1268
Quote Originally Posted by bestcappersports:
6-1 XL.........Washington +2 EXTRA LARGE
12-8 L.........S.Illinois +7.5 LARGE
14-7 M........Loyola-C. +19 MEDIUM
6-8 S..........San Jose State +8.5 SMALL
---------------------------------------------------------------
38-24 YTD
6-1 XL.........Washington +2 EXTRA LARGE
12-8 L.........S.Illinois +7.5 LARGE
14-7 M........Loyola-C. +19 MEDIUM
6-8 S..........San Jose State +8.5 SMALL
---------------------------------------------------------------
38-24 YTD
Just a simple question...
How do you make Washington your largest play when they have not proven to be able to prevail without Upshaw which is the center core of their in/out game along with no one to pick up the slack on the boards?
0
Posted:
#1270
Just a simple answer:
In sport...and specifically wagering on sports...gamblers will tell you it is a good to wager to take a home dog, in conference play, who lost their best player to either injury or in this case kicking a bad apple off the team. The theory is that these guys want to prove they are better without the "star". That's why. Of course if you want to use this one game as your reason why it is not a good play so be it...I will continue to play on teams in situations like this. I liked the pick and would play it again every day of the week.
0
Posted:
#1271
Quote Originally Posted by hometownhero:
Just a simple answer:
Just a simple answer:
In sport...and specifically wagering on sports...gamblers will tell you it is a good to wager to take a home dog, in conference play, who lost their best player to either injury or in this case kicking a bad apple off the team. The theory is that these guys want to prove they are better without the "star". That's why. Of course if you want to use this one game as your reason why it is not a good play so be it...I will continue to play on teams in situations like this. I liked the pick and would play it again every day of the week.
Good post.
Hoping the Huskies don't loose by more than 8. last leg of my teaser. Gonna hope for that 10 point lead to go down to 6 or 7 and then live bet hedge out of it.
0
Posted:
#1272
so x large play, hahahahha 
if x large play don't win all your play are worthless.
why you degens follow this is so funny, I shiet my pants
be smart if x large, MAX BETS, loses they are a degen just like you. to be a winning capper you have to win these big max bets.
I followed cause hot capper atl was on it, but it showed me your not worth following. degens gonna degen
0
Posted:
#1273
Quote Originally Posted by hometownhero:
Just a simple answer:
Just a simple answer:
In sport...and specifically wagering on sports...gamblers will tell you it is a good to wager to take a home dog, in conference play, who lost their best player to either injury or in this case kicking a bad apple off the team. The theory is that these guys want to prove they are better without the "star". That's why. Of course if you want to use this one game as your reason why it is not a good play so be it...I will continue to play on teams in situations like this. I liked the pick and would play it again every day of the week.
Don't agree with your logic in the slightest but thanks for answering.
These types of games are games you stay away from especially with a bad shooting team like Washinton that loses their inside presence. Just my opinion. Good luck with tour futures situations like this one....
0
Posted:
#1274
[Quote: Originally Posted by Tgal1]
Don't agree with your logic in the slightest but thanks for answering.
These types of games are games you stay away from especially with a bad shooting team like Washinton that loses their inside presence. Just my opinion. Good luck with tour futures situations like this one....
Buddy. You don't get it. These are the games you bet. These situations will win more than they lose. Christ almighty..Stanford is shooting 54% from 3 point land. The chances of that happening again on the road is slim and none. This is a situation play...look it up. I have seen numerous threads called "star player out" threads. This is not being pulled out of thin air. Of course you can disagree. Professional gamblers will tell you it is a good angle.
0
Posted:
#1275
Quote Originally Posted by Tgal1:
Quote Originally Posted by hometownhero:
Just a simple answer:In sport...and specifically wagering on sports...gamblers will tell you it is a good to wager to take a home dog, in conference play, who lost their best player to either injury or in this case kicking a bad apple off the team. The theory is that these guys want to prove they are better without the "star". That's why. Of course if you want to use this one game as your reason why it is not a good play so be it...I will continue to play on teams in situations like this. I liked the pick and would play it again every day of the week.
Don't agree with your logic in the slightest but thanks for answering.These types of games are games you stay away from especially with a bad shooting team like Washinton that loses their inside presence. Just my opinion. Good luck with tour futures situations like this one....Just a simple answer:In sport...and specifically wagering on sports...gamblers will tell you it is a good to wager to take a home dog, in conference play, who lost their best player to either injury or in this case kicking a bad apple off the team. The theory is that these guys want to prove they are better without the "star". That's why. Of course if you want to use this one game as your reason why it is not a good play so be it...I will continue to play on teams in situations like this. I liked the pick and would play it again every day of the week.
Here's one for you. Why don't you just stay out of his thread if you don't agree with the play. I absolutely would make this wager 100 times over because the situation presented itself.
0
Hot Forum Topics
