Posted:
#1
Record (0-2) -2.05 UNITS
Detroit -3
Rice -1
Citadel -5
Pacific -2
Hofstra +1
0
12/5 Picks
HERE'S TO THE PROFESSIONAL, AFTER TODAY YOU'LL BE 5-2...THAT'S DAMN SOLID.
Posted:
#16
Quote Originally Posted by MathMan0411:
Cancelling both Rice and Detroit. Injury to Hofman on Detroit and error in my sheet on Rice.
Updated card:
Citadel -5
Pacific -2
Hofstra +1
WOULDN'T YOU THINK THAT A "PROFESSIONAL" WOULD KNOW ABOUT AN INJURY TO A PLAYER BEFORE MAKING HIS CALL???
WOULDN'T YOU ALSO THINK THAT A "PROFESSIONAL" WOULDN'T NEED TO COME INTO A FORUM, ANNOUNCE HIMSELF AS A PROFESSIONAL AND THEN FREAK OUT WHEN PEOPLE QUESTION WHETHER HE'S A PROFESSIONAL.
FADE...........................
0
Posted:
#17
Quote Originally Posted by KingScorpio:
This is what happens when you can't just pick one winner.
This is what happens when you can't just pick one winner.
Funny guy who can suck my nuts! You clearly are an idiot and know anything about variance. For you to be attacking someone after 2 losses in a row and judging me on that amount of samle size tells me you are a moron. Just keep fading me and see how you do over this next month. That is all I ask of you.
Where are your picks for today you dumbass? Easy to bash someone who actually keeps records and is willing to put it out there. Where is your record and picks?
0
Posted:
#18
Quote Originally Posted by fennster:
WOULDN'T YOU THINK THAT A "PROFESSIONAL" WOULD KNOW ABOUT AN INJURY TO A PLAYER BEFORE MAKING HIS CALL???
WOULDN'T YOU ALSO THINK THAT A "PROFESSIONAL" WOULDN'T NEED TO COME INTO A FORUM, ANNOUNCE HIMSELF AS A PROFESSIONAL AND THEN FREAK OUT WHEN PEOPLE QUESTION WHETHER HE'S A PROFESSIONAL.
FADE...........................
You said you would fade me today, so keep doing it. Please!
0
Posted:
#19
Quote Originally Posted by MathMan0411:
You said you would fade me today, so keep doing it. Please!
FIRST, LET ME KNOW IF YOU EXPECT TO WITHDRAW 40% OF YOUR POSTED PICKS AGAIN......HARD TO KNOW WHAT TO FADE WHEN IT CHANGES EVERY 30 MINUTES...
ALSO, UNLIKE YOU, I'VE NEVER TOUTED MYSELF TO BE A "PROFESSIONAL" CAPPER. I'VE NEVER SAID THAT MY SYSTEM, FORMULA, OR ANALYTICAL SKILLS MAKE ME A "PROFESSIONAL". I'M JUST A GUY WHO ENJOYS LOOKING, ANALYZING, THEN PUTTING PLAYS ON GAMES AND TALKING TO OTHER PEOPLE WHO LIKE DOING THE SAME.
ALL I CAN TELL YOU IS THAT I WAS ON NEVADA +2, BEFORE YOUR POST THIS MORNING....NOW, I'M NOT GONNA LIE, SEEING THAT YOU'RE ON PACIFIC DOES MAKE ME FEEL EVEN BETTER ABOUT MY PLAY. 
I
0
Posted:
#20
"HARD TO KNOW WHAT TO FADE WHEN IT CHANGES EVERY 30 MINUTES..."
Changed one time. Do you have any evidence that it changes every 30 minutes or are you making up shit again like yesterday when you said I said Princeton was a lock. Remember that little lie you were spreading that you got caught in?
I thought that Hofman may play today so I grabbed what I thought to be a good line early at -3. He is not playing so I got off the play like any seasoned capper would do. The other pick was an error in my sheet. I manually plug in tons of data and I do make mistakes occassionally so I got off of the play. What is your problem? If you use Matchbook, you got off of your "fade" with little to no vig.
Just keep fading me, that is all I ask. I would prefer that you provide proof so I know you lost money.
0
Posted:
#21
Quote Originally Posted by MathMan0411:
"HARD TO KNOW WHAT TO FADE WHEN IT CHANGES EVERY 30 MINUTES..."
Changed one time. Do you have any evidence that it changes every 30 minutes or are you making up shit again like yesterday when you said I said Princeton was a lock. Remember that little lie you were spreading that you got caught in?
I thought that Hofman may play today so I grabbed what I thought to be a good line early at -3. He is not playing so I got off the play like any seasoned capper would do. The other pick was an error in my sheet. I manually plug in tons of data and I do make mistakes occassionally so I got off of the play. What is your problem? If you use Matchbook, you got off of your "fade" with little to no vig.
Just keep fading me, that is all I ask. I would prefer that you provide proof so I know you lost money.
I GUESS THAT'S ONE OF THE MANY DIFFERENCES BETWEEN US; I HAVE NO NEED TO PROVE ANYTHING TO YOU 
AND YOU DID SAY IT WAS A LOCK
0
Posted:
#22
If Mathman runs his mouth when he is losing, I don't want to be around IF he actually wins one. Should have just started making picks, you are catching the flak you deserve. I have never met a "professional" who has time to respond to EVERY ONE of his naysayers. If this card goes south, try betting 10 games tomorrow - bound to hit some then 
0
Posted:
#23
Quote Originally Posted by KineProfessor:
If Mathman runs his mouth when he is losing, I don't want to be around IF he actually wins one. Should have just started making picks, you are catching the flak you deserve. I have never met a "professional" who has time to respond to EVERY ONE of his naysayers. If this card goes south, try betting 10 games tomorrow - bound to hit some then
If Mathman runs his mouth when he is losing, I don't want to be around IF he actually wins one. Should have just started making picks, you are catching the flak you deserve. I have never met a "professional" who has time to respond to EVERY ONE of his naysayers. If this card goes south, try betting 10 games tomorrow - bound to hit some then
0
IN THE PROCESS
Hot Forum Topics
