Only away dogs within this 14-6 Argos and Elks, of course dependent on the line.
then I like to eliminate high totals or low totals because that is a sign of weak offenses or strong defenses. When I use a lot of parameters it’s because I am trying to eliminate special high and low circumstances.
I think in math it’s called mean, mode, and median. I feel the farther away we get away from typical or standard averages, things become erratic and less predictable.
what I like to eliminate is past outstanding win teams. Specially in the CFL. Calgary dominated the CFL is covers now it’s Winnipeg. There is always one team or a few circumstances that I prefer to avoid. If the data can sort these out I like it more.
D and DIV and week=1 and opS(W)<14
If I add opS(W) it’s 17-6 ats
if I add only away dogs it’s 14-4 ats
D and DIV and week=1 and opS(W)<14 and A
my metodology tonthis is try to be a bit more concise and eliminate losses and paying less juice. Yes I eliminate some wins in this case a 5-4 record which is profitable. But only by .6 units
====================
D and week=1 and t:division!=o:division
28-12 ats
so the dogs in the other 2 games
here is an I interesting filter I have never used before
D and week=1 and t:division!=o:division and ono:division=West this makes the above 20-6 ats it eliminates 8-6 ats
Spottie2935 on socials
0
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
D and DIV and week=1 19-8 ats
Argo/Als
Elks/Lions
Only away dogs within this 14-6 Argos and Elks, of course dependent on the line.
then I like to eliminate high totals or low totals because that is a sign of weak offenses or strong defenses. When I use a lot of parameters it’s because I am trying to eliminate special high and low circumstances.
I think in math it’s called mean, mode, and median. I feel the farther away we get away from typical or standard averages, things become erratic and less predictable.
what I like to eliminate is past outstanding win teams. Specially in the CFL. Calgary dominated the CFL is covers now it’s Winnipeg. There is always one team or a few circumstances that I prefer to avoid. If the data can sort these out I like it more.
D and DIV and week=1 and opS(W)<14
If I add opS(W) it’s 17-6 ats
if I add only away dogs it’s 14-4 ats
D and DIV and week=1 and opS(W)<14 and A
my metodology tonthis is try to be a bit more concise and eliminate losses and paying less juice. Yes I eliminate some wins in this case a 5-4 record which is profitable. But only by .6 units
====================
D and week=1 and t:division!=o:division
28-12 ats
so the dogs in the other 2 games
here is an I interesting filter I have never used before
D and week=1 and t:division!=o:division and ono:division=West this makes the above 20-6 ats it eliminates 8-6 ats
if Ottawa gets some home respect it will be earned with wins and those wins must be at home. If home dogs I expect them to cash money lines. They must show improvement though.
same with the Elks. I won’t bet these teams as chalk though tgat has been proven as burning money
Spottie2935 on socials
0
Elks with 18 wins
Ott with 20 wins
since the pandemic
======
Ott only with 7 games lined as home favorites
if Ottawa gets some home respect it will be earned with wins and those wins must be at home. If home dogs I expect them to cash money lines. They must show improvement though.
same with the Elks. I won’t bet these teams as chalk though tgat has been proven as burning money