All Forums | Boxing

How can anyone say Holyfield won that fight?

...
Participants:
Search
Views: 618
Posts: 24
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2008
Posts: 1282
Posted: #1
Yes its true Valuev didnt do much but he did more than Holyfield and threw doublke the punches
 
 
what won the rounds for Valuev is that he was advancing all fight long and the agressor and Holyfield was backing up
 
 
thats what won it simple as that!
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2004
Posts: 3944
Posted: #2
Your a fool..
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2008
Posts: 1282
Posted: #3
as they say....you gotta BEAT the champ to BE the champ!
 
 
and Holyfield just didnt do enough !!!
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2008
Posts: 1465
Posted: #4
=redpanda
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2008
Posts: 5481
Posted: #5
shut up you tool!         
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2008
Posts: 1282
Posted: #6
are u guys serious?
 
 
Valuev was THE AGRESSOR
 
in a fight where there wasnt many punches thrown thats what won the rounds
 
 
if both guys throw no punches are u gonna award the rounds to the fighter who is always backing up or the one going forward?
 
 
of course the one going forward....THIS IS ONE OF THE CRITERIA in boxing people...wake up!
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2004
Posts: 3944
Posted: #7
Red Panda is a complete tool
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2004
Posts: 3944
Posted: #8
Hey Corkey the Retard..
 
Many punches were not thrown. Correct
 
BUT OF THE PUNCHES THROWN WHO LANDED MORE, and THREW MORE.....
 
Holyfield
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2008
Posts: 1465
Posted: #9
Quote Originally Posted by redpanda:

are u guys serious?
 
 
Valuev was THE AGRESSOR
 
in a fight where there wasnt many punches thrown thats what won the rounds
 
 
if both guys throw no punches are u gonna award the rounds to the fighter who is always backing up or the one going forward?
 
 
of course the one going forward....THIS IS ONE OF THE CRITERIA in boxing people...wake up!

 

how the fuck to you fight a 7 footer and win then....stand up and take a beating........your retard....I can take a loss and i am  not a sore loser, but holyfield won that fight.

 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2005
Posts: 5892
Posted: #10
it doesn't make a damn bit of difference how many punches you throw, if you don't land any. # of punches connected and effective punches are what counts
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2008
Posts: 1282
Posted: #11
neither fighter did anything and i can almost guarantee u Valuev throw way more punches.....let me find the final punch stats!!!
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2008
Posts: 1282
Posted: #12
Quote Originally Posted by Cee_MoNeY:

 

how the fuck to you fight a 7 footer and win then....stand up and take a beating........your retard....I can take a loss and i am  not a sore loser, but holyfield won that fight.

 

yes im a reatrd and your a gaylord with a dick as your avator!!!lol

 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2007
Posts: 5053
Posted: #13
Quote Originally Posted by redpanda:

are u guys serious?
 
 
Valuev was THE AGRESSOR
 
in a fight where there wasnt many punches thrown thats what won the rounds
 
 
if both guys throw no punches are u gonna award the rounds to the fighter who is always backing up or the one going forward?
 
 
of course the one going forward....THIS IS ONE OF THE CRITERIA in boxing people...wake up!


Actually, THAT'S NOT A CRITERION AT ALL. Aggression and moving forward has nothing to do with winning rounds unless you are landing punches.
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2008
Posts: 1282
Posted: #14
a2c,
 
you are wrong!!!
 
learn about boxing and go find out its one of the top criterias I guarantee you!!!!
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2007
Posts: 5053
Posted: #15
Okay, i'll go learn about boxing. Thanks for helping educate me.
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2008
Posts: 1282
Posted: #16
here u go a2c
 
 
 
 
there are 4 criteria
 
clean punching
 
effective aggresiveness
 
ring generalship
 
defense
 
 
 
there is no way u can give that criteria to holyfield when all he did was back up the whole fight wake up people!!!!
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2008
Posts: 5481
Posted: #17
Well i recon we better WAKE UP the announcers,  the fans in the arena, the boxing writers that are writing about the bs decision as we speak.......................   Only REDPANDA is able to see what boxing fans around the WORLD could not.     
 
    Guess you had Briggs over Foreman as well  
 
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2007
Posts: 5053
Posted: #18
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2008
Posts: 1282
Posted: #19
u guys want your money back? check out my nfl parlay in the nfl forum!
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2007
Posts: 552
Posted: #20
Valuev landed 26 total punches...enough said.
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2007
Posts: 5053
Posted: #21
Great NFL parlay redpanda.  New England got the over by themselves.  What kind of currency did you put on your "5000" play?  Pesos? 
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2008
Posts: 1268
Posted: #22
 
 
Anybody who thought valuev won this fight knows ZERO about boxing..
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2007
Posts: 132
Posted: #23
Forget Ali!!!  All he did was move backwards!!
 
The NEW Greatest Of All Time is Randy "Tex" Cobb. He NEVER took a backward step and always Fucked up his opponents fists.
That what I call effective aggresiveness!!!!
 
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2007
Posts: 5053
Posted: #24
Good one weepaul.  Man, what I would give to see a video of Cobb-Barch.  
All Forums | Boxing
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gambling
Betting Sites
US Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Ultimate Race
Office Pools
The Covers community has
810,221
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 30 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
21+
Gambling problem? Call 1-800-GAMBLER
Help Privacy Privacy Choices Terms of Service Cookies Sitemap Forum
Covers is verified safe by:
Evalon Logo Logo GPWA Logo GDPR logo Logo GeoTrust logo Logo
Covers Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2026 Genius Sports. All Rights Reserved.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.