Posted:
#1
Porter -165
Broner +125
$25 on Porter as of now. I hate Broner. Thinking this will be a big bet after I think about it a little more.
What do you guys think?
Broner vs. Porter
...
Views: 3325
Posts: 25
Posted:
#4
Quote Originally Posted by rzagza:
Cincinnati. Catchweight. AND a 2nd day rehydration clause where Porter cant weigh more than 150 lbs on fight night. An absolute joke. Broner is a bum and they realize he needs every advantage against any of the top 147 lb guys. And he'll still probably lose.
Cincinnati. Catchweight. AND a 2nd day rehydration clause where Porter cant weigh more than 150 lbs on fight night. An absolute joke. Broner is a bum and they realize he needs every advantage against any of the top 147 lb guys. And he'll still probably lose.
Fight is in Vegas no?
Posted:
#5
Quote Originally Posted by rzagza:
Cincinnati. Catchweight. AND a 2nd day rehydration clause where Porter cant weigh more than 150 lbs on fight night. An absolute joke. Broner is a bum and they realize he needs every advantage against any of the top 147 lb guys. And he'll still probably lose.
Cincinnati. Catchweight. AND a 2nd day rehydration clause where Porter cant weigh more than 150 lbs on fight night. An absolute joke. Broner is a bum and they realize he needs every advantage against any of the top 147 lb guys. And he'll still probably lose.
1. They are fighting in Vegas
2. Rehydration clause is of 154 pounds on fight night.
3. Its an even match but Broner the underdog for the first time in his career? Vegas trying to get that Broner money in to even the odds
Posted:
#9
Took Broner ML small and over 9.5 rounds small at -300. Think this one should go the distance. I do think Porter is the all around better fighter but Broner will give his all here. It would kind of be worth it to see Broner lose as I feel he's an arrogant prick, but I think Broner will show up and surprise people this fight. My local has broner ml at +120 And I bit. GL
Posted:
#10
Quote Originally Posted by TreyInventor:
Took Broner ML small and over 9.5 rounds small at -300. Think this one should go the distance. I do think Porter is the all around better fighter but Broner will give his all here. It would kind of be worth it to see Broner lose as I feel he's an arrogant prick, but I think Broner will show up and surprise people this fight. My local has broner ml at +120 And I bit. GL
Took Broner ML small and over 9.5 rounds small at -300. Think this one should go the distance. I do think Porter is the all around better fighter but Broner will give his all here. It would kind of be worth it to see Broner lose as I feel he's an arrogant prick, but I think Broner will show up and surprise people this fight. My local has broner ml at +120 And I bit. GL
I'd say better skill goes to Broner. If Porter can't over power you with his bull rushing then its pretty much game over for him. He can't or doesn't make adjustment. Its why he lost his title.
Posted:
#12
I like Porter in this one... Broner is a good fighter, not a great fighter.. I read an article regarding their matchups vs oppenets with similar styles... Broner vs Maidana (Porter) and Porter vs Brock (Broner)...
Porter is closer if not better fighter than Maidana than Broner compares to Brock.
If Porter is able to use his size, dictate, land some hard shots... Broner's 1-2 punch combos every 1:30 won't win it for him...
Posted:
#15
I am seeing Broner-125. Knew when they opened the line at Porter -165 they would get action on Broner, but didn't think the line would change this drastically. Vegas had to know this and set the line up on purpose to entice Broner action. Have to like Porter at -105. Great value there. Am I missing something?
Posted:
#19
Quote Originally Posted by sportscapital:
How many people is for the over 9.5?
How many people is for the over 9.5?
The over looks good (both have never been stopped) but at -340 it is high. Porter could KO him, Broner is running his mouth and didn't shake Porter's hand. Porter is much bigger than the former super feather weight champ Broner, he might regret running his chops to Porter.
Posted:
#25
Quote Originally Posted by ElOso1461:
The line opened up as Porter (-152) and Broner (+120). The odds closed at the MGM with Broner (-145) and Porter (+115). Any thoughts why the line changed so much? I've not seen this before in boxing.
All the supposed sharp money came in 2days before up until fight night, but boy were they wrong.
I was leaning Porter aswell, but this fight just confirmed that Broner is not an elite level fighter, he might have the talent but Porter just beat him on pure will and full stamina. Cashed easy on the over
Hot Forum Topics
