This is the biggest fight ever. The purse is astronomical and it will make some rich men way richer. Money Mayweather loves the spotlight and the money, is there a chance that for 100 million, he could lose or make this very close?
Why not? His legacy is secure and if he goes out and knocks him out in the first round, who is up next for Floyd?
But what if this fight, goes the distance and the underdog happens to win or draw?
Well, we have a rematch of unbelievably epic proportions, another 100 million plus plus fight, in just a few months.
Boxing is the easiest sport in the world because it only takes one person to throw a fight. Everyone has a price, how bout 100 million dollars?
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
If so, think about this.
This is the biggest fight ever. The purse is astronomical and it will make some rich men way richer. Money Mayweather loves the spotlight and the money, is there a chance that for 100 million, he could lose or make this very close?
Why not? His legacy is secure and if he goes out and knocks him out in the first round, who is up next for Floyd?
But what if this fight, goes the distance and the underdog happens to win or draw?
Well, we have a rematch of unbelievably epic proportions, another 100 million plus plus fight, in just a few months.
Boxing is the easiest sport in the world because it only takes one person to throw a fight. Everyone has a price, how bout 100 million dollars?
Excessive standing 8 counts for Pac is about the only conspiracy I see happening. That's ok, keeps the fight interesting for us while Manny is hearing tea kettles.
Excessive standing 8 counts for Pac is about the only conspiracy I see happening. That's ok, keeps the fight interesting for us while Manny is hearing tea kettles.
I think both guys would have to be complicit because if only one guy is trying to keep it close and the other guy is balls to the wall then it's too risky for the one keeping it close. Also the 100 million dollars is way way way more than it needs to be for a fix to occur. At 1 million or less guys will box safely to set up a rematch or trilogy also
I think both guys would have to be complicit because if only one guy is trying to keep it close and the other guy is balls to the wall then it's too risky for the one keeping it close. Also the 100 million dollars is way way way more than it needs to be for a fix to occur. At 1 million or less guys will box safely to set up a rematch or trilogy also
This is the biggest fight ever. The purse is astronomical and it will make some rich men way richer. Money Mayweather loves the spotlight and the money, is there a chance that for 100 million, he could lose or make this very close?
Why not? His legacy is secure and if he goes out and knocks him out in the first round, who is up next for Floyd?
But what if this fight, goes the distance and the underdog happens to win or draw?
Well, we have a rematch of unbelievably epic proportions, another 100 million plus plus fight, in just a few months.
Boxing is the easiest sport in the world because it only takes one person to throw a fight. Everyone has a price, how bout 100 million dollars?
1 pacio future aint in boxing its in being phillopeans president. if pacio cant get er done in the first six rounds then pacio wins second to set up a trilogy 3 money mayweather must win three straight to have the best 50 -0 all time record these men dont care about money or titles or really anything more than winning this fight is leiget in my humble opinion mayweather is a serious dog to south paws manny cant seem to block a over hand right looking forward to seeing who can land the big punch effectively this fight aint going the distance an aint a precedual match these men are for real and its live in two days......
a
Quote Originally Posted by Crashdavis565:
If so, think about this.
This is the biggest fight ever. The purse is astronomical and it will make some rich men way richer. Money Mayweather loves the spotlight and the money, is there a chance that for 100 million, he could lose or make this very close?
Why not? His legacy is secure and if he goes out and knocks him out in the first round, who is up next for Floyd?
But what if this fight, goes the distance and the underdog happens to win or draw?
Well, we have a rematch of unbelievably epic proportions, another 100 million plus plus fight, in just a few months.
Boxing is the easiest sport in the world because it only takes one person to throw a fight. Everyone has a price, how bout 100 million dollars?
1 pacio future aint in boxing its in being phillopeans president. if pacio cant get er done in the first six rounds then pacio wins second to set up a trilogy 3 money mayweather must win three straight to have the best 50 -0 all time record these men dont care about money or titles or really anything more than winning this fight is leiget in my humble opinion mayweather is a serious dog to south paws manny cant seem to block a over hand right looking forward to seeing who can land the big punch effectively this fight aint going the distance an aint a precedual match these men are for real and its live in two days......
p.s. i am a proud conspiracy theist i believ thatat if no logical explatantion justifies the actual history of an out come than a conspiracy must been employed to achieve the out come that was achieved. 2 one mans conspiracy was anothers potential buisness plan follow the money 3 insanity is achieved when a caught conspirator excuses the himself by saying the other man is crazy
this fight only fits one def and 2/3 is at least goal 3/3 is a contridiction in anounced norms and justifiable dissenting party opinion.
p.s. i am a proud conspiracy theist i believ thatat if no logical explatantion justifies the actual history of an out come than a conspiracy must been employed to achieve the out come that was achieved. 2 one mans conspiracy was anothers potential buisness plan follow the money 3 insanity is achieved when a caught conspirator excuses the himself by saying the other man is crazy
this fight only fits one def and 2/3 is at least goal 3/3 is a contridiction in anounced norms and justifiable dissenting party opinion.
p.s. i am a proud conspiracy theist i believ thatat if no logical explatantion justifies the actual history of an out come than a conspiracy must been employed to achieve the out come that was achieved. 2 one mans conspiracy was anothers potential buisness plan follow the money 3 insanity is achieved when a caught conspirator excuses the himself by saying the other man is crazy
this fight only fits one def and 2/3 is at least goal 3/3 is a contridiction in anounced norms and justifiable dissenting party opinion.
Interesting.
Quote Originally Posted by nature1970:
p.s. i am a proud conspiracy theist i believ thatat if no logical explatantion justifies the actual history of an out come than a conspiracy must been employed to achieve the out come that was achieved. 2 one mans conspiracy was anothers potential buisness plan follow the money 3 insanity is achieved when a caught conspirator excuses the himself by saying the other man is crazy
this fight only fits one def and 2/3 is at least goal 3/3 is a contridiction in anounced norms and justifiable dissenting party opinion.
p.s. i am a proud conspiracy theist i believ thatat if no logical explatantion justifies the actual history of an out come than a conspiracy must been employed to achieve the out come that was achieved. 2 one mans conspiracy was anothers potential buisness plan follow the money 3 insanity is achieved when a caught conspirator excuses the himself by saying the other man is crazy
this fight only fits one def and 2/3 is at least goal 3/3 is a contridiction in anounced norms and justifiable dissenting party opinion.
how can someone be so smart and spell like a child.
anyways, keep posting, very interesting insight you have.
Quote Originally Posted by nature1970:
p.s. i am a proud conspiracy theist i believ thatat if no logical explatantion justifies the actual history of an out come than a conspiracy must been employed to achieve the out come that was achieved. 2 one mans conspiracy was anothers potential buisness plan follow the money 3 insanity is achieved when a caught conspirator excuses the himself by saying the other man is crazy
this fight only fits one def and 2/3 is at least goal 3/3 is a contridiction in anounced norms and justifiable dissenting party opinion.
how can someone be so smart and spell like a child.
anyways, keep posting, very interesting insight you have.
I think that Floyd cares about his legacy more than you think. Why lose the fight or try to keep it close against the 2nd best p4p fighter in the world to try and setup a rematch if you're talking about possibly retiring?
I think he gets to 50-0 and then retires.
I think that Floyd cares about his legacy more than you think. Why lose the fight or try to keep it close against the 2nd best p4p fighter in the world to try and setup a rematch if you're talking about possibly retiring?
It's not 100 million...but a FM loss would / could generate another 350 million or more...to a man whose net worth is (reportedly) around 250 mil currently......but as stated previously he really doesn't need another 200 million or so....
SURE...'smart' money says FM wins by decision...but with this much cash on the table...and the shady parties involved...it's hardly a stretch to suggest that MP could win by a ( very controversial) decision ......(after clearly getting outboxed by FM) *THEN....FM wins the rematch netting him 200 million+ (he's making around 175 for this fight).....then they could fight again of course...
To me (betting wise) the 2 possible outcomes are FM to win ITD at +575 or so...and MP to win by decision at +465
As MP is gonna have to force the action no doubt...with a lotta movement / punch volume and try to win the early rounds.... BUT...with his age / poor defense and FM's counterpunching ability....this is likely to get him into trouble...plus FM really doesn't want this one going to the judges due to MP's popularity edge with crowd and (probably) judges as well......some say that MP has a 1-1.5 round edge BEFORE the fight begins
note: THANKS for the entertainment value.....but you guys that come to wagering forum and can only discuss ONE outcome......(meaning you're only here for emotional support for your wager wtf).....are super stupid......
It is better to be feared - than to be loved.
CONSPIRACY?....nope just business
It's not 100 million...but a FM loss would / could generate another 350 million or more...to a man whose net worth is (reportedly) around 250 mil currently......but as stated previously he really doesn't need another 200 million or so....
SURE...'smart' money says FM wins by decision...but with this much cash on the table...and the shady parties involved...it's hardly a stretch to suggest that MP could win by a ( very controversial) decision ......(after clearly getting outboxed by FM) *THEN....FM wins the rematch netting him 200 million+ (he's making around 175 for this fight).....then they could fight again of course...
To me (betting wise) the 2 possible outcomes are FM to win ITD at +575 or so...and MP to win by decision at +465
As MP is gonna have to force the action no doubt...with a lotta movement / punch volume and try to win the early rounds.... BUT...with his age / poor defense and FM's counterpunching ability....this is likely to get him into trouble...plus FM really doesn't want this one going to the judges due to MP's popularity edge with crowd and (probably) judges as well......some say that MP has a 1-1.5 round edge BEFORE the fight begins
note: THANKS for the entertainment value.....but you guys that come to wagering forum and can only discuss ONE outcome......(meaning you're only here for emotional support for your wager wtf).....are super stupid......
wow I woke up this morning and have had a feeling that this wont end. there are 100 million reasons to lose and do it again for an other 100 million reasons next year.
wow I woke up this morning and have had a feeling that this wont end. there are 100 million reasons to lose and do it again for an other 100 million reasons next year.
I can already here the announcers, Floyd seems off his game tonight.....
Mayweather loses. Money doesn't talk, but it looks right back
im not betting this, i don't care if its the easiest play to pick mayweather and he wins. boxing dirty sport, i don't trust an athlete who gambles on sports.
Quote Originally Posted by Crashdavis565:
I can already here the announcers, Floyd seems off his game tonight.....
Mayweather loses. Money doesn't talk, but it looks right back
im not betting this, i don't care if its the easiest play to pick mayweather and he wins. boxing dirty sport, i don't trust an athlete who gambles on sports.
Mayweather loses. Money doesn't talk, but it looks right back
Hot Forum Topics
