Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.) said Sunday that she plans to introduce an assault weapons ban bill on the first day of the new Congress.
"I'm going to introduce in the Senate, and the same bill will be introduced in the House -- a bill to ban assault weapons..
Who needs these military-style assault weapons? Who needs an ammunition feeding device capable of holding 100 rounds?" Feinstein wrote on her campaign website. "These weapons are not for hunting deer -- they’re for hunting people."
"It will ban the sale, the transfer, the importation and the possession, not retroactively, but prospectively," and ban the sale of clips of more than ten bullets, Feinstein said. "The purpose of this bill is to get... weapons of war off the streets
0
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.) said Sunday that she plans to introduce an assault weapons ban bill on the first day of the new Congress.
"I'm going to introduce in the Senate, and the same bill will be introduced in the House -- a bill to ban assault weapons..
Who needs these military-style assault weapons? Who needs an ammunition feeding device capable of holding 100 rounds?" Feinstein wrote on her campaign website. "These weapons are not for hunting deer -- they’re for hunting people."
"It will ban the sale, the transfer, the importation and the possession, not retroactively, but prospectively," and ban the sale of clips of more than ten bullets, Feinstein said. "The purpose of this bill is to get... weapons of war off the streets
Oh right..any weapon produced by the gun manufacturers and slapped with an NRA endorsement miraculously falls under the million mile wide umbrella of the second amendment right?
What joke how we allow the gun lobby and corporate putzes to control this country.
0
So whats the problem banning these again?
Oh right..any weapon produced by the gun manufacturers and slapped with an NRA endorsement miraculously falls under the million mile wide umbrella of the second amendment right?
What joke how we allow the gun lobby and corporate putzes to control this country.
Whether you regard this bill as right or wrong, it's not going to help assault rifle supporters that Adam Lanza's mom, who was found riddled with bullets, was an avid gun enthusiast who apparently didn't keep the weapons locked up and safe from her deranged son.
0
Whether you regard this bill as right or wrong, it's not going to help assault rifle supporters that Adam Lanza's mom, who was found riddled with bullets, was an avid gun enthusiast who apparently didn't keep the weapons locked up and safe from her deranged son.
Slim may be upset that the "captive NFL audience" at stadiums and at home in front of the TV had to endure a moment of silence today before every game for the Connecticut victims. Damnit, Bob Costas!
0
Slim may be upset that the "captive NFL audience" at stadiums and at home in front of the TV had to endure a moment of silence today before every game for the Connecticut victims. Damnit, Bob Costas!
+ never let a tragedy go to waste. These bans and restrictions were written by the gun control lobbies years ago. They were just waiting until they could politically pounce. They will use this tragedy to push their agenda.
0
+ never let a tragedy go to waste. These bans and restrictions were written by the gun control lobbies years ago. They were just waiting until they could politically pounce. They will use this tragedy to push their agenda.
+ never let a tragedy go to waste. These bans and restrictions were written by the gun control lobbies years ago. They were just waiting until they could politically pounce. They will use this tragedy to push their agenda.
Just be honest rick..
You like the agenda of the NRA and the pro-gun corporations, and you are against the anti groups.
You really are too biased to fairly represent the issue..the issue is the extent to which we have allowed weapons to be manufactured and sold, this has absolutely NOTHING to do with the second amendment.
The second amendment is out of control, it is not serving the purpose to protect citizens, corporations have seized hold on this to make money at the cost of events like this.
0
Quote Originally Posted by rick3117:
+ never let a tragedy go to waste. These bans and restrictions were written by the gun control lobbies years ago. They were just waiting until they could politically pounce. They will use this tragedy to push their agenda.
Just be honest rick..
You like the agenda of the NRA and the pro-gun corporations, and you are against the anti groups.
You really are too biased to fairly represent the issue..the issue is the extent to which we have allowed weapons to be manufactured and sold, this has absolutely NOTHING to do with the second amendment.
The second amendment is out of control, it is not serving the purpose to protect citizens, corporations have seized hold on this to make money at the cost of events like this.
Slim may be upset that the "captive NFL audience" at stadiums and at home in front of the TV had to endure a moment of silence today before every game for the Connecticut victims. Damnit, Bob Costas!
No, it was the 15 min interuption NBC gave to Obama for the Sunday night Connecticut vigil ..when it was on every other station ...and no I wasn't a capvive audience this time ..I turned on the radio ..
0
Quote Originally Posted by UberDog:
Slim may be upset that the "captive NFL audience" at stadiums and at home in front of the TV had to endure a moment of silence today before every game for the Connecticut victims. Damnit, Bob Costas!
No, it was the 15 min interuption NBC gave to Obama for the Sunday night Connecticut vigil ..when it was on every other station ...and no I wasn't a capvive audience this time ..I turned on the radio ..
the second amendment means what the big corporations that benefit from it say it means. but i don't see how that answer the question. sure, if the question was about taking all guns away, then the second amendment would be one of several responses. but what is the reason not to ban assault rifles.?
0
the second amendment means what the big corporations that benefit from it say it means. but i don't see how that answer the question. sure, if the question was about taking all guns away, then the second amendment would be one of several responses. but what is the reason not to ban assault rifles.?
+ never let a tragedy go to waste. These bans and restrictions were written by the gun control lobbies years ago. They were just waiting until they could politically pounce. They will use this tragedy to push their agenda.
As opposed to those who ignore every tragedy? Of course, the pro-gun lobby has never been known to "pounce" on an issue, or candidate they opposed. And they never plan legislation years ahead and wait until the right moment to "push" it. Yes, the pro-gun lobby is the only innocent and lilly white political muscle in America.
0
Quote Originally Posted by rick3117:
+ never let a tragedy go to waste. These bans and restrictions were written by the gun control lobbies years ago. They were just waiting until they could politically pounce. They will use this tragedy to push their agenda.
As opposed to those who ignore every tragedy? Of course, the pro-gun lobby has never been known to "pounce" on an issue, or candidate they opposed. And they never plan legislation years ahead and wait until the right moment to "push" it. Yes, the pro-gun lobby is the only innocent and lilly white political muscle in America.
You are lacking in situational awareness then. Better be careful in the movie theater or at the mall. Let's say you're being sucke punched is the price you pay for the 1st Amendment--similar to those who are asked to bear the cost of the 2nd amendment.
0
You are lacking in situational awareness then. Better be careful in the movie theater or at the mall. Let's say you're being sucke punched is the price you pay for the 1st Amendment--similar to those who are asked to bear the cost of the 2nd amendment.
Darkhorse--According to the argument being advanced here and in several other threads, shooting victims are allowed to be unexpectedly and fatally inconvenienced as sacrificial lambs in schools, malls and other public places for our Second Amendment "freedoms." It's the price we pay. Get used to it. However, inconveniencing some football fans for 90-seconds of lame commentary is an intolerable price to pay for the 1st Amendment.
0
Darkhorse--According to the argument being advanced here and in several other threads, shooting victims are allowed to be unexpectedly and fatally inconvenienced as sacrificial lambs in schools, malls and other public places for our Second Amendment "freedoms." It's the price we pay. Get used to it. However, inconveniencing some football fans for 90-seconds of lame commentary is an intolerable price to pay for the 1st Amendment.
Anyone have any figures on how many people have been killed by assult rifles compared to how many have been saved by them ? Outside of the military of course.
0
Anyone have any figures on how many people have been killed by assult rifles compared to how many have been saved by them ? Outside of the military of course.
The problem is gun-free zones ....Gun-free zones are magnets for massacres....the Clackamas Town Center mall shootings, the movie theater in Aurora, Colorado,the Virginia Tech school shooting , the Connecticut elementary school massacre...and the unarmed soldiers caught in a deadly shooting rampage at Fort Hood.
.. cowardly ,perverted psychopathsshooting unarmed people in a gun-free zone..
Arm the teachers.. shut down the TSA at airports ( they never catch terrorist ) place the Homeland Security in schools and gun-free zones.. all they are doing is harrassing wheelchair-bound passangers and groping Americans anyway ...
0
The problem is gun-free zones ....Gun-free zones are magnets for massacres....the Clackamas Town Center mall shootings, the movie theater in Aurora, Colorado,the Virginia Tech school shooting , the Connecticut elementary school massacre...and the unarmed soldiers caught in a deadly shooting rampage at Fort Hood.
.. cowardly ,perverted psychopathsshooting unarmed people in a gun-free zone..
Arm the teachers.. shut down the TSA at airports ( they never catch terrorist ) place the Homeland Security in schools and gun-free zones.. all they are doing is harrassing wheelchair-bound passangers and groping Americans anyway ...
They may differ in different states but they need to increase the penalty on those who didn't safeguard their guns whether it results in injuries/deaths or not. Obviously it's pointless in this case but they really need to go after those irresponsible people. The right of owning any firearm comes with hugh responsbility as well.
0
They may differ in different states but they need to increase the penalty on those who didn't safeguard their guns whether it results in injuries/deaths or not. Obviously it's pointless in this case but they really need to go after those irresponsible people. The right of owning any firearm comes with hugh responsbility as well.
The problem is gun-free zones ....Gun-free zones are magnets for massacres....the Clackamas Town Center mall shootings, the movie theater in Aurora, Colorado,the Virginia Tech school shooting , the Connecticut elementary school massacre...and the unarmed soldiers caught in a deadly shooting rampage at Fort Hood.
.. cowardly ,perverted psychopathsshooting unarmed people in a gun-free zone..
Arm the teachers.. shut down the TSA at airports ( they never catch terrorist ) place the Homeland Security in schools and gun-free zones.. all they are doing is harrassing wheelchair-bound passangers and groping Americans anyway ...
Arming the teachers is the solution? What's next? They need to arm the mall employees, theater employees, postal workers....? How about the other sectors in society?
Those are called "lunatics" for a reason and you really think they give a second thought if the teacher is armed?
0
Quote Originally Posted by SarasotaSlim:
The problem is gun-free zones ....Gun-free zones are magnets for massacres....the Clackamas Town Center mall shootings, the movie theater in Aurora, Colorado,the Virginia Tech school shooting , the Connecticut elementary school massacre...and the unarmed soldiers caught in a deadly shooting rampage at Fort Hood.
.. cowardly ,perverted psychopathsshooting unarmed people in a gun-free zone..
Arm the teachers.. shut down the TSA at airports ( they never catch terrorist ) place the Homeland Security in schools and gun-free zones.. all they are doing is harrassing wheelchair-bound passangers and groping Americans anyway ...
Arming the teachers is the solution? What's next? They need to arm the mall employees, theater employees, postal workers....? How about the other sectors in society?
Those are called "lunatics" for a reason and you really think they give a second thought if the teacher is armed?
The problem is gun-free zones ....Gun-free zones are magnets for massacres....the Clackamas Town Center mall shootings, the movie theater in Aurora, Colorado,the Virginia Tech school shooting , the Connecticut elementary school massacre...and the unarmed soldiers caught in a deadly shooting rampage at Fort Hood.
.. cowardly ,perverted psychopathsshooting unarmed people in a gun-free zone..
Arm the teachers.. shut down the TSA at airports ( they never catch terrorist ) place the Homeland Security in schools and gun-free zones.. all they are doing is harrassing wheelchair-bound passangers and groping Americans anyway ...
I sure am glad you are not in charge
0
Quote Originally Posted by SarasotaSlim:
The problem is gun-free zones ....Gun-free zones are magnets for massacres....the Clackamas Town Center mall shootings, the movie theater in Aurora, Colorado,the Virginia Tech school shooting , the Connecticut elementary school massacre...and the unarmed soldiers caught in a deadly shooting rampage at Fort Hood.
.. cowardly ,perverted psychopathsshooting unarmed people in a gun-free zone..
Arm the teachers.. shut down the TSA at airports ( they never catch terrorist ) place the Homeland Security in schools and gun-free zones.. all they are doing is harrassing wheelchair-bound passangers and groping Americans anyway ...
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.