i think scalia forgot he is a judge and not a politician. he needs to shut up and interpret law and stop with all this political b.s.
how we let these doddering dinosaurs with no grasp of reality interpret law for the nation is beyond me. give them 15 years and then get new ones. no reason senile insane shutins in their 60's and 70's should be making these kinds of decisions.
0
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
article
i think scalia forgot he is a judge and not a politician. he needs to shut up and interpret law and stop with all this political b.s.
how we let these doddering dinosaurs with no grasp of reality interpret law for the nation is beyond me. give them 15 years and then get new ones. no reason senile insane shutins in their 60's and 70's should be making these kinds of decisions.
i think scalia forgot he is a judge and not a politician. he needs to shut up and interpret law and stop with all this political b.s.
how we let these doddering dinosaurs with no grasp of reality interpret law for the nation is beyond me. give them 15 years and then get new ones. no reason senile insane shutins in their 60's and 70's should be making these kinds of decisions.
Except it wasn't "political BS" at all.
What Dionne can't seem to grasp that Justice Scalia is referring to the Obama Administration's legal arguments IN the court cases.
But of course old EJ went all ZOMG, HE MENTIONED A POLICY!!!!!!111$@##@#
i think scalia forgot he is a judge and not a politician. he needs to shut up and interpret law and stop with all this political b.s.
how we let these doddering dinosaurs with no grasp of reality interpret law for the nation is beyond me. give them 15 years and then get new ones. no reason senile insane shutins in their 60's and 70's should be making these kinds of decisions.
Except it wasn't "political BS" at all.
What Dionne can't seem to grasp that Justice Scalia is referring to the Obama Administration's legal arguments IN the court cases.
But of course old EJ went all ZOMG, HE MENTIONED A POLICY!!!!!!111$@##@#
Scalia is eventually going to have meltdown like an alias that gets owned on this site... only difference, is that he cant come back with another login and act like it never happened...
0
Scalia is eventually going to have meltdown like an alias that gets owned on this site... only difference, is that he cant come back with another login and act like it never happened...
What Dionne can't seem to grasp that Justice Scalia is referring to the Obama Administration's legal arguments IN the court cases.
But of course old EJ went all ZOMG, HE MENTIONED A POLICY!!!!!!111$@##@#
How could it possibly have to to with Obama's legal arguments when the policy he was referring to was announced (very recently) well after all briefs had been submitted and the oral arguments had been heard. It had no place in the decision and was clearly just Scalia's political opinion. While he verbally derides so-called judicial activism, he has become the most politically activist judge, maybe ever.
0
Quote Originally Posted by 14daroad:
Except it wasn't "political BS" at all.
What Dionne can't seem to grasp that Justice Scalia is referring to the Obama Administration's legal arguments IN the court cases.
But of course old EJ went all ZOMG, HE MENTIONED A POLICY!!!!!!111$@##@#
How could it possibly have to to with Obama's legal arguments when the policy he was referring to was announced (very recently) well after all briefs had been submitted and the oral arguments had been heard. It had no place in the decision and was clearly just Scalia's political opinion. While he verbally derides so-called judicial activism, he has become the most politically activist judge, maybe ever.
I actually love Scalia. You know what you are getting with him and he is absolutely brilliant.
With that being said, from what is coming out of the opinion, it sounds like this might be Robert's masterpiece.
I actually met Scalia. My uncle was the assistant DA in Maryland for many years and I got a chance to meet the man.
While he is a staunch conservative, and I disagree with a lot of his views on issues he is exceptionally brilliant. I remember he was going over a railroad case that was brought up in the supreme court about interstate railroad cargo and manufacturing. He really gives a great name to conservatives, however the ass clowns here, genuinely come off as hannity, o'reilly, and coulter regurgitators.
I'm not exactly sure you understand how smart the guy is. But I would like to hear what made you also believe he is brilliant.
0
Quote Originally Posted by djbrow:
I actually love Scalia. You know what you are getting with him and he is absolutely brilliant.
With that being said, from what is coming out of the opinion, it sounds like this might be Robert's masterpiece.
I actually met Scalia. My uncle was the assistant DA in Maryland for many years and I got a chance to meet the man.
While he is a staunch conservative, and I disagree with a lot of his views on issues he is exceptionally brilliant. I remember he was going over a railroad case that was brought up in the supreme court about interstate railroad cargo and manufacturing. He really gives a great name to conservatives, however the ass clowns here, genuinely come off as hannity, o'reilly, and coulter regurgitators.
I'm not exactly sure you understand how smart the guy is. But I would like to hear what made you also believe he is brilliant.
I actually met Scalia. My uncle was the assistant DA in Maryland for many years and I got a chance to meet the man.
While he is a staunch conservative, and I disagree with a lot of his views on issues he is exceptionally brilliant. I remember he was going over a railroad case that was brought up in the supreme court about interstate railroad cargo and manufacturing. He really gives a great name to conservatives, however the ass clowns here, genuinely come off as hannity, o'reilly, and coulter regurgitators.
I'm not exactly sure you understand how smart the guy is. But I would like to hear what made you also believe he is brilliant.
I believe he is very brilliant.
I also believe the reason you see him as extra brilliant is a paradigm thing. Many intelligent people seen through your eyes...well 'kapow kashow'.
cheers
0
Quote Originally Posted by Stiln:
I actually met Scalia. My uncle was the assistant DA in Maryland for many years and I got a chance to meet the man.
While he is a staunch conservative, and I disagree with a lot of his views on issues he is exceptionally brilliant. I remember he was going over a railroad case that was brought up in the supreme court about interstate railroad cargo and manufacturing. He really gives a great name to conservatives, however the ass clowns here, genuinely come off as hannity, o'reilly, and coulter regurgitators.
I'm not exactly sure you understand how smart the guy is. But I would like to hear what made you also believe he is brilliant.
I believe he is very brilliant.
I also believe the reason you see him as extra brilliant is a paradigm thing. Many intelligent people seen through your eyes...well 'kapow kashow'.
How could it possibly have to to with Obama's legal arguments when the policy he was referring to was announced (very recently) well after all briefs had been submitted and the oral arguments had been heard. It had no place in the decision and was clearly just Scalia's political opinion. While he verbally derides so-called judicial activism, he has become the most politically activist judge, maybe ever.
Um, because you could actually bother to familiarize yourself with the issue. That's how.
You do not even know what the Administration argued in that case.
0
Quote Originally Posted by depeche2:
How could it possibly have to to with Obama's legal arguments when the policy he was referring to was announced (very recently) well after all briefs had been submitted and the oral arguments had been heard. It had no place in the decision and was clearly just Scalia's political opinion. While he verbally derides so-called judicial activism, he has become the most politically activist judge, maybe ever.
Um, because you could actually bother to familiarize yourself with the issue. That's how.
You do not even know what the Administration argued in that case.
I actually met Scalia. My uncle was the assistant DA in Maryland for many years and I got a chance to meet the man.
While he is a staunch conservative, and I disagree with a lot of his views on issues he is exceptionally brilliant. I remember he was going over a railroad case that was brought up in the supreme court about interstate railroad cargo and manufacturing. He really gives a great name to conservatives, however the ass clowns here, genuinely come off as hannity, o'reilly, and coulter regurgitators.
I'm not exactly sure you understand how smart the guy is. But I would like to hear what made you also believe he is brilliant.
He is by far the most personal Justice in some time, although I think Roberts will end up being as well.
Several of the justices on the left have remarked, to clerks, how much they hate his politics but love his person.
During session, he eats lunch at the same pizza place nearly everyday, sometimes alone and will talk to whomever is around him.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Stiln:
I actually met Scalia. My uncle was the assistant DA in Maryland for many years and I got a chance to meet the man.
While he is a staunch conservative, and I disagree with a lot of his views on issues he is exceptionally brilliant. I remember he was going over a railroad case that was brought up in the supreme court about interstate railroad cargo and manufacturing. He really gives a great name to conservatives, however the ass clowns here, genuinely come off as hannity, o'reilly, and coulter regurgitators.
I'm not exactly sure you understand how smart the guy is. But I would like to hear what made you also believe he is brilliant.
He is by far the most personal Justice in some time, although I think Roberts will end up being as well.
Several of the justices on the left have remarked, to clerks, how much they hate his politics but love his person.
During session, he eats lunch at the same pizza place nearly everyday, sometimes alone and will talk to whomever is around him.
Um, because you could actually bother to familiarize yourself with the issue. That's how.
You do not even know what the Administration argued in that case.
Um, notice how you didn't respond to what I said. Scalia cited and opined upon a development that happened after the case had been briefed and argued. It was totally inappropriate to go where he went.
0
Quote Originally Posted by 14daroad:
Um, because you could actually bother to familiarize yourself with the issue. That's how.
You do not even know what the Administration argued in that case.
Um, notice how you didn't respond to what I said. Scalia cited and opined upon a development that happened after the case had been briefed and argued. It was totally inappropriate to go where he went.
I don't doubt that Scalia is extremely intelligent, as are all the justices. It would be very unusual to get to that spot without being of extraordinary intelligence.
But intelligent minds can and do differ. And I think Scalia has changed over the years and become more political especially with Bush v. Gore and beyond.
0
I don't doubt that Scalia is extremely intelligent, as are all the justices. It would be very unusual to get to that spot without being of extraordinary intelligence.
But intelligent minds can and do differ. And I think Scalia has changed over the years and become more political especially with Bush v. Gore and beyond.
Um, notice how you didn't respond to what I said. Scalia cited and opined upon a development that happened after the case had been briefed and argued. It was totally inappropriate to go where he went.
You don't know:
A. What Scalia said
B. What the Administration argued.
0
Quote Originally Posted by depeche2:
Um, notice how you didn't respond to what I said. Scalia cited and opined upon a development that happened after the case had been briefed and argued. It was totally inappropriate to go where he went.
I don't doubt that Scalia is extremely intelligent, as are all the justices. It would be very unusual to get to that spot without being of extraordinary intelligence.
But intelligent minds can and do differ. And I think Scalia has changed over the years and become more political especially with Bush v. Gore and beyond.
I have heard how ever his meltdown is more to rile up the "talking heads" to become vocal and get the partisan lemming worshipers of talking heads to start bitching/whining/attacking etc...
pretty evident by the usual suspects reaction today on this site...
0
Quote Originally Posted by depeche2:
I don't doubt that Scalia is extremely intelligent, as are all the justices. It would be very unusual to get to that spot without being of extraordinary intelligence.
But intelligent minds can and do differ. And I think Scalia has changed over the years and become more political especially with Bush v. Gore and beyond.
I have heard how ever his meltdown is more to rile up the "talking heads" to become vocal and get the partisan lemming worshipers of talking heads to start bitching/whining/attacking etc...
pretty evident by the usual suspects reaction today on this site...
the point is he is a scj and needs to opine on that which is in front of him in the sc and needs to shut the fuck up about executive orders because they have been, are, and shall be. if he doesnt like it, he should quit the court and be the ragdoll republican he has already become and advocate for a change in executive orders.
he has overstepped. thankfully a man full of that much hate will be dead soon.
0
the point is he is a scj and needs to opine on that which is in front of him in the sc and needs to shut the fuck up about executive orders because they have been, are, and shall be. if he doesnt like it, he should quit the court and be the ragdoll republican he has already become and advocate for a change in executive orders.
he has overstepped. thankfully a man full of that much hate will be dead soon.
Um, notice how you didn't respond to what I said. Scalia cited and opined upon a development that happened after the case had been briefed and argued. It was totally inappropriate to go where he went.
Um, notice how you didn't respond to what I said. Scalia cited and opined upon a development that happened after the case had been briefed and argued. It was totally inappropriate to go where he went.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.
Hot Forum Topics
