Wisconsin at Stanford (01/01/2013)

Forum: College Football Page 1 of 2  1 2  
Author: [College Football] Topic: Wisconsin at Stanford (01/01/2013)
Covers PM Covers
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 61
Ireland
 
Covers
Participation Meter
Posted: 12/2/2012 9:53:13 PM

Away:  Wisconsin [6-7 ATS]
Home:  Stanford [8-5 ATS]

Game Time: 5:00 PM
Stadium: Rose Bowl

Recent Meetings:
01/01/00 - STAN 9 vs. WISC 17
09/21/96 - STAN 0 vs. WISC 14
09/16/95 - WISC 24 vs. STAN 24

Team Leaders:

Wisconsin:
Passing: Joel Stave (1104)
Rushing: Montee Ball (1727)
Receiving: Jared Abbrederis (793)

Stanford:
Passing: Josh Nunes (1643)
Rushing: Stepfan Taylor (1442)
Receiving: Zach Ertz (837)

More:
Live Odds
In-Depth Matchup Information
Consensus Betting Information

osu200200 PM osu200200
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 1723
Texas
 
osu200200
Participation Meter
Posted: 12/6/2012 2:50:45 PM
wisconsin losing their coach will play a factor. if anything would go with stanford and lay the pts, but expecting an ugly game. prob a no play
Coloneljim PM Coloneljim
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 13318
 
Coloneljim
Participation Meter
Posted: 12/6/2012 8:29:13 PM

Stanford - 27                                     Wisconsin - 20

Cardinal -6.5                                   under 47.5

3 Rose Bowl losses in a row for the Badgers. The colonel is betting it happens. We'll be doing some gangnam style dancing when this one's over amigos

Stanford - Under

royal72 PM royal72
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 35
California
 
royal72
Participation Meter
Posted: 12/12/2012 2:24:53 AM
Hey an easy game for the picking, the odds are right for once.
Buddhabud PM Buddhabud
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 433
Georgia
 
Buddhabud
Participation Meter
Posted: 12/13/2012 3:06:15 PM
Stanford rollllllsssss
bmilehigh PM bmilehigh
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 174
Colorado
 
bmilehigh
Participation Meter
Posted: 12/17/2012 4:55:44 PM
Wisconsin has not come close to beating a team the caliber of Stanford this year. Adding in the Big 10's Rose Bowl curse, the game won't be close.

Stanford - 6 1/2
Coloneljim PM Coloneljim
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 13318
 
Coloneljim
Participation Meter
Posted: 12/22/2012 12:17:06 PM
QUOTE Originally Posted by Coloneljim:

Stanford - 27                                     Wisconsin - 20

Cardinal -6.5                                   under 47.5

3 Rose Bowl losses in a row for the Badgers. The colonel is betting it happens. We'll be doing some gangnam style dancing when this one's over amigos

Stanford - Under

Oh well so much for the gangnam style dancing. Stanford DT Terrence Stephens declared ineligible for the Roses. This is a huge hit for the Cardinal team since they are thin on experience. The colonel had to re-evaluate this one, and I see it now the 6.5 just might be a bit too much here after that loss of experience & leadership.

Wisconsin - 21                                           Stanford - 17

Badgers +6.5                                   under 47.5

For some reason the dog in Stanford Bowl games seems the appropriate way to make your ....Take Wisky and the points and

Badgers - Under

Hardtimes75 PM Hardtimes75
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 477
Maryland
 
Hardtimes75
Participation Meter
Posted: 12/22/2012 2:08:13 PM
QUOTE Originally Posted by Coloneljim:

Oh well so much for the gangnam style dancing. Stanford DT Terrence Stephens declared ineligible for the Roses. This is a huge hit for the Cardinal team since they are thin on experience. The colonel had to re-evaluate this one, and I see it now the 6.5 just might be a bit too much here after that loss of experience & leadership.

Wisconsin - 21                                           Stanford - 17

Badgers +6.5                                   under 47.5

For some reason the dog in Stanford Bowl games seems the appropriate way to make your ....Take Wisky and the points and

Badgers - Under



I appreciate the info about the Stanford DT being out, but let me try to understand something here.  Stanford's losing a Defensive player, but without him you have them scoring TEN fewer points & Wisconsin only scoring 1 more???  That just doesn't make any sense.
Coloneljim PM Coloneljim
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 13318
 
Coloneljim
Participation Meter
Posted: 12/22/2012 3:04:58 PM

Simple, more running the ball from Wisky, less possessions for Stanford.  With a little more research I see the Cardinal scored 13 vs ND, 21 vs USC, &13 vs Washington. I compare Wisky's defense to those club's so 17 is about right. Thanks Hardtimes. It's a tough call here, like bmile said, the big 10 usually in Rose Bowl games. Maybe Alvarez will be the answer.

GL AMIGO

knasty007 PM knasty007
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 3046
Ohio
 
knasty007
Participation Meter
Posted: 12/24/2012 12:52:51 PM
STANFORD BEATS THEM BY 2 SCORES.... PLAYING AGAINST ALL BIG 10 TEAMS .....MAYBE NOT  NORTWESTERN....BIG TEN SUXX
Nhenley PM Nhenley
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 641
Oregon
 
Nhenley
Participation Meter
Posted: 12/29/2012 4:56:02 PM

Stanford losing their DT isn't going to impact their defense that much or impact the outcome. Last time I checked, the defense has 11 players and I'm sure the other 10 players will proudly fill the plug for their injured comrade.

The only 2 positions that will impact an outcome of a game is if a team loses their starting qb and starting rb. Other than that, the coaches will find a way to improvise with the backup player, whoever that is.  Having said that, Stanford wins by 2 TDS.  WIsconsin is a fraud and so are the rest of the BIG10 teams.

SportsPredictor PM SportsPredictor
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 688
Massachusetts
 
SportsPredictor
Participation Meter
Posted: 12/30/2012 1:51:40 AM

Caution on All Remaining Bowl Games!

Must use great caution on all remaining "Bowl" games.  Oklahoma State throwing footballs directly into the hands (three times) of enemy players only ten yards away...TCU fumbling footballs on two yard lines...yesterday's game of a team "fumbling" footballs twice on the ONE YARD line...and all of these teams going under the Vegas spread!

And many, many "flags" even noticed by the TV commentators as "false flags".

Can't be "sour grapes" as I've been on the winning side of a few of these "disasters".  But such actions, in bowl game after bowl game, no "accidents".  Many have noticed the same, no doubt.  Must use great caution on all remaining bowl games.

BOL                                     

SportsPredictor PM SportsPredictor
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 688
Massachusetts
 
SportsPredictor
Participation Meter
Posted: 12/30/2012 2:09:19 AM

Correction above...Oregon State not Oklahoma State.

GLTA           

mak104 PM mak104
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 170
 
mak104
Participation Meter
Posted: 12/31/2012 8:50:51 PM
Although I don't agree that the big ten has regressed that significantly, Wisconsin has lost to most of the big guns there.Stanfords losses were to the #2 team in the nation (yuk) and one other 4 pt loss.I'll lay the 5 1/2.
combato PM combato
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 743
Texas
 
combato
Participation Meter
Posted: 12/31/2012 9:21:22 PM
These teams are very similar in that play very physical on both sides of the ball.   Both teams will run and stop the run with big tough defensive line play.  Wisc is actually excited to have Alvarez on the sideline to coach the team because he is a Wisconsin legend.  The team actually requested that he come down and coach this game which speaks volumes about the cohesiveness of this team and the Wisc football administration.  Wisc does have the motivational edge in this game I believe.  Now for the numbers that some of you love so much and some of you hate so much

1.  Consensus - solid play on Wisc with heavy pub consensus on Stanford
2.  Scoring predictor shows Wisc 27, Stan 23 making Wisc a true favorite of -4.
3.  No play to date on SS ML indicator
4.  Strong edge to Wisc on the CE differential - the good handicappers like Wisc by a 25% margin.  THis is huge when used in conjunction with consensus and scoring predictor
Play Wisconsin for 2 units - if late steam comes on Wisc, increase to 3 units.
volexpert PM volexpert
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 29
 
volexpert
Participation Meter
Posted: 1/1/2013 3:26:41 AM
I agree combato I love Wisconsin here.  I think they win straight up money line for me
DrDogs PM DrDogs
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 1895
Tennessee
 
DrDogs
Participation Meter
Posted: 1/1/2013 8:50:12 AM
Stanford for the large!
Posted using a mobile device.
combato PM combato
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 743
Texas
 
combato
Participation Meter
Posted: 1/1/2013 11:05:39 AM
QUOTE Originally Posted by knasty007:

STANFORD BEATS THEM BY 2 SCORES.... PLAYING AGAINST ALL BIG 10 TEAMS .....MAYBE NOT  NORTWESTERN....BIG TEN SUXX


If the Big 10 sucks, why have I cashed winners on Mich St and Minn?
combato PM combato
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 743
Texas
 
combato
Participation Meter
Posted: 1/1/2013 11:11:19 AM
I really love it when all the squares come out on NY day, jumping on the big favorites with all of their " x is gonna kill Y " and " 2 TD easy winner " gibberish.   Check in on the Covers threads, find out what all the squares like and go the other way.  That is a real simple system that usually wins more than it loses.  Another one is find some bozo who can't pick his own nose and fade their picks as well.
mikeny PM mikeny
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 1822
New York
 
mikeny
Participation Meter
Posted: 1/1/2013 11:18:19 AM
QUOTE

Originally Posted by combato:

These teams are very similar in that play very physical on both sides of the ball.   Both teams will run and stop the run with big tough defensive line play.  Wisc is actually excited to have Alvarez on the sideline to coach the team because he is a Wisconsin legend.  The team actually requested that he come down and coach this game which speaks volumes about the cohesiveness of this team and the Wisc football administration.  Wisc does have the motivational edge in this game I believe.  Now for the numbers that some of you love so much and some of you hate so much

1.  Consensus - solid play on Wisc with heavy pub consensus on Stanford
2.  Scoring predictor shows Wisc 27, Stan 23 making Wisc a true favorite of -4.
3.  No play to date on SS ML indicator
4.  Strong edge to Wisc on the CE differential - the good handicappers like Wisc by a 25% margin.  THis is huge when used in conjunction with consensus and scoring predictor
Play Wisconsin for 2 units - if late steam comes on Wisc, increase to 3 units.

 

you are absolutely right. i agree 100. i dont know if wisky will win but what you said i agree with.

JustWin001 PM JustWin001
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 30
Texas
 
JustWin001
Participation Meter
Posted: 1/1/2013 12:25:19 PM
[Quote: Originally Posted by osu200200] wisconsin losing their coach will play a factor. if anything would go with stanford and lay the pts, but expecting an ugly game. prob a no play 

Loss of coach could be a big positive.  Alvarez is 3-0 in the Rose bowl. 

Wisc +5 

thesoulpurpose PM thesoulpurpose
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 1127
Quebec
 
thesoulpurpose
Participation Meter
Posted: 1/1/2013 1:30:42 PM
wisconsin +7 (purchased 1.5 points -140) and over 47
seanpsu124 PM seanpsu124
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 160
New York
 
seanpsu124
Participation Meter
Posted: 1/1/2013 1:32:06 PM
QUOTE Originally Posted by bmilehigh:

Wisconsin has not come close to beating a team the caliber of Stanford this year. Adding in the Big 10's Rose Bowl curse, the game won't be close.

Stanford - 6 1/2

Wisconsin lost 5 games this year...@ Oregon St, @ Penn St, @ Nebraska, Ohio St and Michigan St. Penn St, Ohio St and MSU were losses in OT and none of there losses were by more than a TD. They are not as bad as their record looks.

Wisconsin +5, under 47

 

imaxfli PM imaxfli
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 339
 
imaxfli
Participation Meter
Posted: 1/1/2013 1:42:28 PM
Losing Bielema helps the Badgers..they will play with emotion for Barry in a low scoring, defensive battle...gotta take the points.
Buddhabud PM Buddhabud
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 433
Georgia
 
Buddhabud
Participation Meter
Posted: 1/1/2013 2:30:53 PM
The underdogs have been barking but this is a steal at -4Go Stanford
Forum: College Football Page 1 of 2  1 2  
You have entered the forum as a GUEST. 
You must login/register to post or reply.