Boise Got D. I don't see hawaii doing much against the broncos. Hawaii is in trouble. Look for another blowout, Boise half and game! Don't know what the halftime line is but I think the score will be at least 21-0 maybe more. All boise has to do is hold onto the ball and UH just hands out touchdowns... This is the last time we will be playing Boise, they'll be mad as hell and take it out on the warriors. Believe that!
0
Boise Got D. I don't see hawaii doing much against the broncos. Hawaii is in trouble. Look for another blowout, Boise half and game! Don't know what the halftime line is but I think the score will be at least 21-0 maybe more. All boise has to do is hold onto the ball and UH just hands out touchdowns... This is the last time we will be playing Boise, they'll be mad as hell and take it out on the warriors. Believe that!
Damn, this one is tricky. Boise St. has an even better defense than Fresno does and Frenso covered but just barely. BUT Frenso does have a better offense than Boise does so this concerns me.
UH's offense is horrible and nothing about them worries me except maybe just the typical cheap TD at the end when it's garbage and means nothing.
Looking at Boise St. games, seems like they are good at blowing out shitty teams with one exception so far. That'll be at New Mexico but it shows that the only reason why New Mexico kept it close because they shoved the ball down Boise's throat netting over 300 rushing yards and an insanely low 44 passing yards.
Good thing is that UH can't do either, so no big worries there.
BUT....
Boise's offense isn't ranked very high, average at best. But I won't only be counting on their offense to cover. I'll bet that their defense will score 2 TD's themselves to help this cover. If they can't then sadly UH covers.
So luckily I believe that the Boise St. offense will be able to hang at least 3TD's themselves on offense but most likely 4TD's.
I'd see a score of maybe 42-10. A teaser for Boise St should be an awesome pick but then again you'd have to add on at least 2 more teams to make it worthwhile.
Oh yeah, another good thing for Boise backers is that one of UH's top receivers most likely is out. He had a neck injury and was taken to the hospital that night against Fresno but luckily it isn't career ending but most likely he'll be kept out this week to be safe. He averages 13.8 yards, tied with 2TDs, and 3rd in both receptions and yards. That's a pretty big blow if he's out of the game. Even if he plays I don't think they'll push him hard and possibly make an injury worse. A neck injury isn't something to be just ignoring. Oh well, good news for betters!
We'll see what happens with UH's Trevor Davis as we get further into the week. But early lean on Boise St. to cover half and game. Figure half would most likely be about 17-20.
0
Damn, this one is tricky. Boise St. has an even better defense than Fresno does and Frenso covered but just barely. BUT Frenso does have a better offense than Boise does so this concerns me.
UH's offense is horrible and nothing about them worries me except maybe just the typical cheap TD at the end when it's garbage and means nothing.
Looking at Boise St. games, seems like they are good at blowing out shitty teams with one exception so far. That'll be at New Mexico but it shows that the only reason why New Mexico kept it close because they shoved the ball down Boise's throat netting over 300 rushing yards and an insanely low 44 passing yards.
Good thing is that UH can't do either, so no big worries there.
BUT....
Boise's offense isn't ranked very high, average at best. But I won't only be counting on their offense to cover. I'll bet that their defense will score 2 TD's themselves to help this cover. If they can't then sadly UH covers.
So luckily I believe that the Boise St. offense will be able to hang at least 3TD's themselves on offense but most likely 4TD's.
I'd see a score of maybe 42-10. A teaser for Boise St should be an awesome pick but then again you'd have to add on at least 2 more teams to make it worthwhile.
Oh yeah, another good thing for Boise backers is that one of UH's top receivers most likely is out. He had a neck injury and was taken to the hospital that night against Fresno but luckily it isn't career ending but most likely he'll be kept out this week to be safe. He averages 13.8 yards, tied with 2TDs, and 3rd in both receptions and yards. That's a pretty big blow if he's out of the game. Even if he plays I don't think they'll push him hard and possibly make an injury worse. A neck injury isn't something to be just ignoring. Oh well, good news for betters!
We'll see what happens with UH's Trevor Davis as we get further into the week. But early lean on Boise St. to cover half and game. Figure half would most likely be about 17-20.
Damn, this one is tricky. Boise St. has an even better defense than Fresno does and Frenso covered but just barely. BUT Frenso does have a better offense than Boise does so this concerns me.
UH's offense is horrible and nothing about them worries me except maybe just the typical cheap TD at the end when it's garbage and means nothing.
Looking at Boise St. games, seems like they are good at blowing out shitty teams with one exception so far. That'll be at New Mexico but it shows that the only reason why New Mexico kept it close because they shoved the ball down Boise's throat netting over 300 rushing yards and an insanely low 44 passing yards.
Good thing is that UH can't do either, so no big worries there.
BUT....
Boise's offense isn't ranked very high, average at best. But I won't only be counting on their offense to cover. I'll bet that their defense will score 2 TD's themselves to help this cover. If they can't then sadly UH covers.
So luckily I believe that the Boise St. offense will be able to hang at least 3TD's themselves on offense but most likely 4TD's.
I'd see a score of maybe 42-10. A teaser for Boise St should be an awesome pick but then again you'd have to add on at least 2 more teams to make it worthwhile.
Oh yeah, another good thing for Boise backers is that one of UH's top receivers most likely is out. He had a neck injury and was taken to the hospital that night against Fresno but luckily it isn't career ending but most likely he'll be kept out this week to be safe. He averages 13.8 yards, tied with 2TDs, and 3rd in both receptions and yards. That's a pretty big blow if he's out of the game. Even if he plays I don't think they'll push him hard and possibly make an injury worse. A neck injury isn't something to be just ignoring. Oh well, good news for betters!
We'll see what happens with UH's Trevor Davis as we get further into the week. But early lean on Boise St. to cover half and game. Figure half would most likely be about 17-20.
WOW!!!!!! DUDE DONT OVER THINK IT BOISE THIS IS EASY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
0
Quote Originally Posted by Xyberz:
Damn, this one is tricky. Boise St. has an even better defense than Fresno does and Frenso covered but just barely. BUT Frenso does have a better offense than Boise does so this concerns me.
UH's offense is horrible and nothing about them worries me except maybe just the typical cheap TD at the end when it's garbage and means nothing.
Looking at Boise St. games, seems like they are good at blowing out shitty teams with one exception so far. That'll be at New Mexico but it shows that the only reason why New Mexico kept it close because they shoved the ball down Boise's throat netting over 300 rushing yards and an insanely low 44 passing yards.
Good thing is that UH can't do either, so no big worries there.
BUT....
Boise's offense isn't ranked very high, average at best. But I won't only be counting on their offense to cover. I'll bet that their defense will score 2 TD's themselves to help this cover. If they can't then sadly UH covers.
So luckily I believe that the Boise St. offense will be able to hang at least 3TD's themselves on offense but most likely 4TD's.
I'd see a score of maybe 42-10. A teaser for Boise St should be an awesome pick but then again you'd have to add on at least 2 more teams to make it worthwhile.
Oh yeah, another good thing for Boise backers is that one of UH's top receivers most likely is out. He had a neck injury and was taken to the hospital that night against Fresno but luckily it isn't career ending but most likely he'll be kept out this week to be safe. He averages 13.8 yards, tied with 2TDs, and 3rd in both receptions and yards. That's a pretty big blow if he's out of the game. Even if he plays I don't think they'll push him hard and possibly make an injury worse. A neck injury isn't something to be just ignoring. Oh well, good news for betters!
We'll see what happens with UH's Trevor Davis as we get further into the week. But early lean on Boise St. to cover half and game. Figure half would most likely be about 17-20.
WOW!!!!!! DUDE DONT OVER THINK IT BOISE THIS IS EASY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
WOW!!!!!! DUDE DONT OVER THINK IT BOISE THIS IS EASY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Betting and actually winning games is about analyzing everything about the game. I'm definitely no professional handicapper but ones that charge big money and actually make money for their betters don't just flip a coin before they decide who to pick. Their career depends on them making sure nothing get's thru the cracks that may make a difference between a big win or loss for betters.
I'd love to be able to say betting is as easy as choosing heads or tails, but it's VERY far from it. If that's how you bet, honestly don't. Sadly it's not a 50/50 chance and doing some simple math will help prove that easily.
0
Quote Originally Posted by ladybibitybop:
WOW!!!!!! DUDE DONT OVER THINK IT BOISE THIS IS EASY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Betting and actually winning games is about analyzing everything about the game. I'm definitely no professional handicapper but ones that charge big money and actually make money for their betters don't just flip a coin before they decide who to pick. Their career depends on them making sure nothing get's thru the cracks that may make a difference between a big win or loss for betters.
I'd love to be able to say betting is as easy as choosing heads or tails, but it's VERY far from it. If that's how you bet, honestly don't. Sadly it's not a 50/50 chance and doing some simple math will help prove that easily.
Didn't realize this before but most likely this will be a nationally televised game. Don't know how UH keeps getting games put up on national TV considering that they're really not a worthy team to be deserving so much spotlight.
Don't think that Boise St. will wanna look like some chumps on ESPN against the 2nd worst team in the nation. Surprising that some teams with absolutely 0 wins is actually ranked higher than UH. Man, that's a huge confidence blower that's hard to wrap your head around. Boise is gonna help ingrain that fact into UH on Saturday.
0
Didn't realize this before but most likely this will be a nationally televised game. Don't know how UH keeps getting games put up on national TV considering that they're really not a worthy team to be deserving so much spotlight.
Don't think that Boise St. will wanna look like some chumps on ESPN against the 2nd worst team in the nation. Surprising that some teams with absolutely 0 wins is actually ranked higher than UH. Man, that's a huge confidence blower that's hard to wrap your head around. Boise is gonna help ingrain that fact into UH on Saturday.
Betting and actually winning games is about analyzing everything about the game. I'm definitely no professional handicapper but ones that charge big money and actually make money for their betters don't just flip a coin before they decide who to pick. Their career depends on them making sure nothing get's thru the cracks that may make a difference between a big win or loss for betters.
I'd love to be able to say betting is as easy as choosing heads or tails, but it's VERY far from it. If that's how you bet, honestly don't. Sadly it's not a 50/50 chance and doing some simple math will help prove that easily.
Your so bad.... Go back to the kiddie pool!
0
Quote Originally Posted by Xyberz:
Betting and actually winning games is about analyzing everything about the game. I'm definitely no professional handicapper but ones that charge big money and actually make money for their betters don't just flip a coin before they decide who to pick. Their career depends on them making sure nothing get's thru the cracks that may make a difference between a big win or loss for betters.
I'd love to be able to say betting is as easy as choosing heads or tails, but it's VERY far from it. If that's how you bet, honestly don't. Sadly it's not a 50/50 chance and doing some simple math will help prove that easily.
Yeah so bad that I won over 10 games combined NCAAF & NFL last week and only lost 3. That bad huh? Chump go home. I won big last week and already up big this week and that was with this weeks mid games.
Anyone can post shit out of their mouth but backing it up with winners ain't easy.
0
Quote Originally Posted by 0ahuGrown:
Your so bad.... Go back to the kiddie pool!
Yeah so bad that I won over 10 games combined NCAAF & NFL last week and only lost 3. That bad huh? Chump go home. I won big last week and already up big this week and that was with this weeks mid games.
Anyone can post shit out of their mouth but backing it up with winners ain't easy.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.