No true PG on the road=turnovers for OSU.
GL!
No true PG on the road=turnovers for OSU.
GL!
No true PG on the road=turnovers for OSU.
GL!
No true PG on the road=turnovers for OSU.
GL!
ANY REASON Y U ON LASALLE 1H
AND OHIO.
I LIKE BOTH JUST NEED A PUSH FROM UR INSIGHT
TY AND BOL
ANY REASON Y U ON LASALLE 1H
AND OHIO.
I LIKE BOTH JUST NEED A PUSH FROM UR INSIGHT
TY AND BOL
No true PG on the road=turnovers for OSU.
GL!
All starters back from a team that barely made the tournament last year and we are supposed to believe this overrated squad is instantly top 10 worthy? and should be laying 3 pts to a veteran squad like Ohio St who will have a major rebounding advantage? ![]()
No true PG on the road=turnovers for OSU.
GL!
All starters back from a team that barely made the tournament last year and we are supposed to believe this overrated squad is instantly top 10 worthy? and should be laying 3 pts to a veteran squad like Ohio St who will have a major rebounding advantage? ![]()
All starters back from a team that barely made the tournament last year and we are supposed to believe this overrated squad is instantly top 10 worthy? and should be laying 3 pts to a veteran squad like Ohio St who will have a major rebounding advantage? ![]()
All starters back from a team that barely made the tournament last year and we are supposed to believe this overrated squad is instantly top 10 worthy? and should be laying 3 pts to a veteran squad like Ohio St who will have a major rebounding advantage? ![]()
All starters back from a team that barely made the tournament last year and we are supposed to believe this overrated squad is instantly top 10 worthy? and should be laying 3 pts to a veteran squad like Ohio St who will have a major rebounding advantage? ![]()
All starters back from a team that barely made the tournament last year and we are supposed to believe this overrated squad is instantly top 10 worthy? and should be laying 3 pts to a veteran squad like Ohio St who will have a major rebounding advantage? ![]()
I like this angle from statfox
Play On - A favorite (FLORIDA) - in a game involving two teams who had good records (60% to 80%) from last season, with all five starters returning from last year in the first 5 games of the season. (52-17 since 1997.) (75.4%, +33.3 units. Rating = 4*).
I like this angle from statfox
Play On - A favorite (FLORIDA) - in a game involving two teams who had good records (60% to 80%) from last season, with all five starters returning from last year in the first 5 games of the season. (52-17 since 1997.) (75.4%, +33.3 units. Rating = 4*).
Gainesville is a tough place to play. Not going to argue that. I just think Sullinger is the real deal and Florida is soft inside w a banged up Maclin and Tyus. Florida definitely has a quickness advantage, but I watched plenty of games last season where Walker and Boynton stay on the perimeter and jack up deep threes instead of penerating and creating. I don't think Florida plays to their strengths and I'm couting on the size of Lighty and Buford to disrupt those perimeter shots. BOL. Should be a good game
Gainesville is a tough place to play. Not going to argue that. I just think Sullinger is the real deal and Florida is soft inside w a banged up Maclin and Tyus. Florida definitely has a quickness advantage, but I watched plenty of games last season where Walker and Boynton stay on the perimeter and jack up deep threes instead of penerating and creating. I don't think Florida plays to their strengths and I'm couting on the size of Lighty and Buford to disrupt those perimeter shots. BOL. Should be a good game
Gainesville is a tough place to play. Not going to argue that. I just think Sullinger is the real deal and Florida is soft inside w a banged up Maclin and Tyus. Florida definitely has a quickness advantage, but I watched plenty of games last season where Walker and Boynton stay on the perimeter and jack up deep threes instead of penerating and creating. I don't think Florida plays to their strengths and I'm couting on the size of Lighty and Buford to disrupt those perimeter shots. BOL. Should be a good game
Florida by 2 and we all win![]()
Gainesville is a tough place to play. Not going to argue that. I just think Sullinger is the real deal and Florida is soft inside w a banged up Maclin and Tyus. Florida definitely has a quickness advantage, but I watched plenty of games last season where Walker and Boynton stay on the perimeter and jack up deep threes instead of penerating and creating. I don't think Florida plays to their strengths and I'm couting on the size of Lighty and Buford to disrupt those perimeter shots. BOL. Should be a good game
Florida by 2 and we all win![]()

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.