2009 YTD (132-91-6)+59.02 59.2% (63-38-4 last 14 days)
MU YTD (9-4) +2.5U 69%
Well fellas, had another great night going 4-1 and netting 5.8 units for the night. I'm in a nice groove the last 13 days going 58-34-2 (63%) and netting 38.5 units during that time. I'm also .98 units away from my goal of 60 units by the Big Dance, so let's see if we can continue to build the bankroll for the Tourney. The lines are already out, but I'm not too impressed at this moment. I'm still going look for 1-3 solid plays for tomorrow. As always positive feedback welcome.
EARLY LEANS
• South Florida -6.5
• Seton Hall -5.5
• Seton Hall u167
• St Bonnie -1.5
These are my first glance leans. Still lots of capping to do.
0
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
2009 YTD (132-91-6)+59.02 59.2% (63-38-4 last 14 days)
MU YTD (9-4) +2.5U 69%
Well fellas, had another great night going 4-1 and netting 5.8 units for the night. I'm in a nice groove the last 13 days going 58-34-2 (63%) and netting 38.5 units during that time. I'm also .98 units away from my goal of 60 units by the Big Dance, so let's see if we can continue to build the bankroll for the Tourney. The lines are already out, but I'm not too impressed at this moment. I'm still going look for 1-3 solid plays for tomorrow. As always positive feedback welcome.
EARLY LEANS
• South Florida -6.5
• Seton Hall -5.5
• Seton Hall u167
• St Bonnie -1.5
These are my first glance leans. Still lots of capping to do.
I liked the Seton-Prov Under 170.5 on SAT and it freakin did go over... didnt bet, why is this o/u 4 points less? I would still go under here, and I like Seton Hall to make a run in this Tourney.
0
I liked the Seton-Prov Under 170.5 on SAT and it freakin did go over... didnt bet, why is this o/u 4 points less? I would still go under here, and I like Seton Hall to make a run in this Tourney.
Looked long and hard at Seton Hall and something just kept me off that game. It's really tempting to take them with as bad as providence defense is but providnce cane score. Starting to think the over even though it's so high
0
I just locked in Butler, Cincy and Montana...
Looked long and hard at Seton Hall and something just kept me off that game. It's really tempting to take them with as bad as providence defense is but providnce cane score. Starting to think the over even though it's so high
I liked the Seton-Prov Under 170.5 on SAT and it freakin did go over... didnt bet, why is this o/u 4 points less? I would still go under here, and I like Seton Hall to make a run in this Tourney.
I had the over, watched the last two minutes there was a bit of funny stuff surprised Prov didnt let them dribble it out down 13 or so. Neither teams play D I think this one goes over legit not relying on FT's or OT. Jamine Peterson was in foul trouble Prov probably would have had 10 more points at any stage of the game with him in.
No clue if Keno will give the kids a shot or let the fuckin losers like Curry and McKenzie play. I don't understand why he isnt giving the guys he brought in more of a chance, Petersons a stud but the rest of the team he inherited is a disgrace wtf isnt he lettign Duke Mondy get some pt???
0
Quote Originally Posted by JDubs800:
I liked the Seton-Prov Under 170.5 on SAT and it freakin did go over... didnt bet, why is this o/u 4 points less? I would still go under here, and I like Seton Hall to make a run in this Tourney.
I had the over, watched the last two minutes there was a bit of funny stuff surprised Prov didnt let them dribble it out down 13 or so. Neither teams play D I think this one goes over legit not relying on FT's or OT. Jamine Peterson was in foul trouble Prov probably would have had 10 more points at any stage of the game with him in.
No clue if Keno will give the kids a shot or let the fuckin losers like Curry and McKenzie play. I don't understand why he isnt giving the guys he brought in more of a chance, Petersons a stud but the rest of the team he inherited is a disgrace wtf isnt he lettign Duke Mondy get some pt???
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.