All Forums | Tennis

Adieu/Adios/AuRevoir/So Long

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 1908
Posts: 42
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2005
Posts: 4403
Posted: #1

Guys Guys Guys. No disappearing act and then coming back when things have colled down. Like I promised you, I am offically gone from the Tennis forum. I made a promise and I will stick to it. Its clear most of you hate on me and and its clear you don't respect my picks or me, so why stay and annoy you all? I have lost on covers before and I have always bounced back and I will bounce back again. That is another promise. For the people how said I can't cap (see links at the end of this post). Madskills, especially u who thinks me losing 5250 is the end of the world. Notice the amounts in the below threads and you will see clearly its not.

I have had a few PM's in support of me, so of anyone wants a Tennis pick during the US open, I will create a blog on my covers space (or just PM me). I have decided also not to bet big on anything bar the majors when it comes to Tennis in future.

Also, I do wonder if Murray will ever win a major. He was suffering yesterday no doubt, but you would never see Nadal or Federer show such obvious weakness in the same circumstanes. His body language is all wrong when things go against him. My money is already down on him and Djoko for the US open so looks like more Tennis pain there .

One wrong pick does not make me suddenly a bad Capper. I will continue and will always continue to post boxing picks, so the people that don't hate I will continue to do my best for you and I apologise for those who tailed me yesterday. I always take it personally when I lose, as I hate to leave people down.

I made a promise to leave the tennis forum for goofd if I lost and I am a man of my word and always will be. I will not stay anywhere I am clearly not wanted and despite all the genuine hate towards me, yesterday was fun. Losing 5k not so much fun but you cant tell me your werent all excited in that tie break.

I promise my followers I will bounce back like I always have in the past. To the haters, good luck with your plays, I don't hold grudges long, especially over the internet...

I promise this IS MY LAST EVER POST on the tennis forum...

To people who say I can't cap. Your deluding yourselves...So I got one wrong. As you can see below on big plays, I am hitting at a sick rate and all the haters in the world are kidding themselves if they can't see that..Mack will be back...Check the boxing forum in the coming weeks, when I could be betting 25% of my roll on the Aurthur Abraham v Carl Froch (which is a pickem in the books) providing there is something to fight for (see Super 6 rules, this may turn out to be a dead rubber with both already qualified..If thats the case will have to reduce the stakes applied.

https://www.covers.com/postingforum/post01/showmessage.aspx?spt=38&sub=100801789

https://www.covers.com/postingforum/post01/showmessage.aspx?spt=38&sub=100802198

https://www.covers.com/postingforum/post01/showmessage.aspx?spt=41&sub=100781189 (2nd best result this year)

https://www.covers.com/postingforum/post01/showmessage.aspx?spt=38&sub=100779963 (best result in 3 years)

https://www.covers.com/postingforum/post01/showmessage.aspx?spt=36&sub=100779774

https://www.covers.com/postingforum/post01/showmessage.aspx?spt=38&sub=100778996

https://www.covers.com/postingforum/post01/showmessage.aspx?spt=39&sub=100769631

https://www.covers.com/postingforum/post01/showmessage.aspx?spt=38&sub=100765410 (Nadal to win Wimbledon @+250

https://www.covers.com/postingforum/post01/showmessage.aspx?spt=22&sub=100760003

https://www.covers.com/postingforum/post01/showmessage.aspx?spt=36&sub=100749601

https://www.covers.com/postingforum/post01/showmessage.aspx?spt=39&sub=100738652

https://www.covers.com/postingforum/post01/showmessage.aspx?spt=21&sub=100645850 (+450 NFL dog)

Champ Out. So Long Take care and good luck

 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2005
Posts: 10039
Posted: #2
Good luck gathering clients somewhere else
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2005
Posts: 10039
Posted: #3
Also...have another username picked out? Am sure you will be back in some capacity
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2004
Posts: 27902
Posted: #4
I never said you couldn't cap. I just said you act like you are God's gift to gambling and you aren't. I still have yet to see one of your "followers" post that they come to you or rely on you for picks. I think it's stupid what you did saying if you lose you will leave the forum as it rings of something from pro wrestling. You should have just let it go and taken your beating for the wrong pick. It got pretty ugly in here and people piled on. Again I have no problem with you other then you act like you are the best on here capper, which you aren't. I don't claim to be just as a note, far from it. I am a bad gambler as I struggle with the money management and make stupid bets at times. But I don't come on here touting how people follow me and I make people money. If they follow a pick I post and it wins, then good for us both. If they don't then don't, it won't hurt my feelings. Good luck Mack05 and learn a little humility and don't be such a douche. No one likes a douche.
 
MVP
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2007
Posts: 16408
Posted: #5
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2010
Posts: 299
Posted: #6
Sparty444 you should take the advice Jarrett gave to Mack, more so on the douche part
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2008
Posts: 14143
Posted: #7
Quote Originally Posted by dj_yaz:

Sparty444 you should take the advice Jarrett gave to Mack, more so on the douche part



 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2005
Posts: 10039
Posted: #8
DjYaz... you miss Mack already? Am sure he has some picks to sell you
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2008
Posts: 27318
Posted: #9
Murray might win the US Open but putting money on Djoker to do it was as good as burning it IMHO. Murray at least had some excuses as to why he looked like he did yesterday, and Murray at least fought tooth and nail to the end. What Djokovic did yesterday was a disgrace, but hey, I will take the free money he handed out even if it is disgusting as a semi fan of the guy.

I hope you still enjoy the sport and capping it. You are good but you talked a lot of shit in your own way and belittled others more than any other ten posters I ever saw and I doubt you were ever going to change so I am glad overall that I lost my Murray bet. And no man, we did not cap that correctly. Even if Murray wins in the third set breaker somehow there is a good argument that we were on the wrong side of the value and you certainly were at over -200.

Anyway, adios. I come here for fun and discussion and you brought neither IMHO, just picks that you did not even want to debate half the time (seems you would rather insult the people who disagreed and tout yourself instead of staying on point about the actual match) and a Christ Complex. When you are here the whole forum is All About Mack and that made it a bit of a hellhole, but not anymore.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2008
Posts: 4004
Posted: #10
The problem with Mack is that he doesn't understand many concepts that sports bettors deal with regularly and which should be well clear to whoever wants to be successful in the long run (the main one being variance). I know he doesn't understand them and honestly I am not really interested in debating these with him because from someone who does actually understand these mathematical concepts, certain 'Mack' type of sentences and definitions would not even be a valuable option when trying to explain their point of view.

He keeps linking the thread where he bet a huge part of his roll on the Nadal vs Murray match at Wimbledon, despite the fact that I, who understand everything we are dealing with when betting, told him that his reasoning was wrong (had he said different sentences Nadal could have been a solid play, but with his reasoning it was garbage) regardless of what the outcome was going to be for several aspects which I actually even tried to explain to him before giving up because it was obvious I was talking to a wall. Result? Nadal wins 3-0 and he says he is the best because Nadal won 3-0. Pretty obvious for someone who doesn't understand these proved theories.

Paul The Octopus was 9-0 in the World Cup, I don't hear him talking as much shit as you. You know why? Because even he understands that an accurate estimate and forecast of one capper can not possibly be done after such a small data sample.

Mack, probably you posted what, 30 plays here in the Tennis forum? Even in the case you are 28-2 (which you clearly are not) that doesn't mean anything, it means less than nothing actually, it is so silly that you just don't understand that. This is why people look at sims, n3gative, BurningPlanet with respect, because each of these guys posted thousands of wagers on this site, which is a fair amount of data to forecast what could happen in the future. Too hard to understand?
 
A total of 30 plays aren't even close to being a very small data sample my dear Mack. This is why people laugh at you.
According to your theory if the Mariners take 3 out of 4 from the Yankees in Baseball or if Zimbawe beats Spain 3-1 in the Davis Cup, Seattle Mariners and Zimbawe would be the better side.
You realize how ridiculous this sounds?

These concepts are obviously too hard for you and I am not really interested in discussing them with you because whatever next play you will have (Yes, I will believe you will be back, your life is just too awful, no offense ) you will continue saying, 'wait after the match and you will realize why I am the best', hehe, so let's just leave it to that.

Anyway, I for one am really sad to see you go, your threads literally gave me joy when I needed it in a cloudy or rainy day when I was in the middle of handicapping matches.
I opened them and my humor would get better and better.

I read on another post that you were on holiday and I feel a bit silly that you posted hundreds of time while on vacation because on my 3 weeks vacation I didn't log into Covers even once.
Damn, you definitely did beat the shit out of me there.


 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2007
Posts: 13450
Posted: #11
I bet Mack had fish in-game for another big winner  
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2007
Posts: 22613
Posted: #12
Quote Originally Posted by sparty444:

Also...have another username picked out? Am sure you will be back in some capacity
...I'll pay him in rotten fish-faak sticks...
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2010
Posts: 299
Posted: #13
Quote Originally Posted by sparty444:

DjYaz... you miss Mack already? Am sure he has some picks to sell you


same old responses to everyone. thinking everyone is a tout or thinking everyone else is spending their money on them.

 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2005
Posts: 10039
Posted: #14

So what is your diagnosis then dj_yaz?

Please enlighten us with your infinite wisdom

 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2008
Posts: 30979
Posted: #15
Mack always posting links to past wins
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2008
Posts: 9021
Posted: #16
Quote Originally Posted by TennisCapper:

The problem with Mack is that he doesn't understand many concepts that sports bettors deal with regularly and which should be well clear to whoever wants to be successful in the long run (the main one being variance). I know he doesn't understand them and honestly I am not really interested in debating these with him because from someone who does actually understand these mathematical concepts, certain 'Mack' type of sentences and definitions would not even be a valuable option when trying to explain their point of view.

He keeps linking the thread where he bet a huge part of his roll on the Nadal vs Murray match at Wimbledon, despite the fact that I, who understand everything we are dealing with when betting, told him that his reasoning was wrong (had he said different sentences Nadal could have been a solid play, but with his reasoning it was garbage) regardless of what the outcome was going to be for several aspects which I actually even tried to explain to him before giving up because it was obvious I was talking to a wall. Result? Nadal wins 3-0 and he says he is the best because Nadal won 3-0. Pretty obvious for someone who doesn't understand these proved theories.

Paul The Octopus was 9-0 in the World Cup, I don't hear him talking as much shit as you. You know why? Because even he understands that an accurate estimate and forecast of one capper can not possibly be done after such a small data sample.

Mack, probably you posted what, 30 plays here in the Tennis forum? Even in the case you are 28-2 (which you clearly are not) that doesn't mean anything, it means less than nothing actually, it is so silly that you just don't understand that. This is why people look at sims, n3gative, BurningPlanet with respect, because each of these guys posted thousands of wagers on this site, which is a fair amount of data to forecast what could happen in the future. Too hard to understand?
 
A total of 30 plays aren't even close to being a very small data sample my dear Mack. This is why people laugh at you.
According to your theory if the Mariners take 3 out of 4 from the Yankees in Baseball or if Zimbawe beats Spain 3-1 in the Davis Cup, Seattle Mariners and Zimbawe would be the better side.
You realize how ridiculous this sounds?

These concepts are obviously too hard for you and I am not really interested in discussing them with you because whatever next play you will have (Yes, I will believe you will be back, your life is just too awful, no offense ) you will continue saying, 'wait after the match and you will realize why I am the best', hehe, so let's just leave it to that.

Anyway, I for one am really sad to see you go, your threads literally gave me joy when I needed it in a cloudy or rainy day when I was in the middle of handicapping matches.
I opened them and my humor would get better and better.

I read on another post that you were on holiday and I feel a bit silly that you posted hundreds of time while on vacation because on my 3 weeks vacation I didn't log into Covers even once.
Damn, you definitely did beat the shit out of me there.




Arrogant v pompous, you v Mack, 6 of one, half-dozen of the other...
Yes, you understand everything, o mighty one.



 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2009
Posts: 17
Posted: #17
is this a tennis fourm our just a bunch of womam bitching wow the guy lost the bet. let him say his fianl words with out all you men jump on he' S SHIT or i mean all you woman shut up and talk tennis 
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2008
Posts: 4004
Posted: #18
Quote Originally Posted by esplanade:



Arrogant v pompous, you v Mack, 6 of one, half-dozen of the other...
Yes, you understand everything, o mighty one.





Is there anything wrong with my post?
Who the fuck are you again?

Go back into your shithole where you belong, before I own you like I owned Mack and many others.

estupidplanade
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2007
Posts: 22613
Posted: #19
Quote Originally Posted by TennisCapper:



Is there anything wrong with my post?
Who the fuck are you again?

Go back into your shithole where you belong, before I own you like I owned Mack and many others.

estupidplanade
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2007
Posts: 5347
Posted: #20
Quote Originally Posted by dj_yaz:

Sparty444 you should take the advice Jarrett gave to Mack, more so on the douche part


I actually think Sparty is more annoying and idiotic then Mack, and that my friends is saying a lot.  I really think he should spend less time obsessing over individuals in this forum and more time capping and doing research, maybe then his picks would actually hit.
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2007
Posts: 5347
Posted: #21
QUOTE Originally Posted by dj_yaz:

Sparty444 you should take the advice Jarrett gave to Mack, more so on the douche part

Quote Originally Posted by Mad_Skillz123:







 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2007
Posts: 5347
Posted: #22
Quote Originally Posted by dj_yaz:



same old responses to everyone. thinking everyone is a tout or thinking everyone else is spending their money on them.



Yep that's Sparty alright.  I bet you it is Sparty that actually wanted to be a tout, unfortunately he spends more time being a wannabe police officer in a sports forum rather then actually capping matches and doing research.  Too bad he only posts his picks once every two weeks and when he does he picks Kanepi over Clijsters.  Sparty just has no class whatsoever, one of the biggest douche-bags if not the biggest I have ever met on Covers since I joined in 2007, and that is saying a lot.
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2005
Posts: 10039
Posted: #23

I love it... i'm an a-hole because I call you out for doing shady stuff. Thats typical shady attitude. Its my fault for pointing out past posts instead of you taking responsibility for it.

Please link the Fed to win Cincy bet? Is no sign of it anywhere...but yet it mysteriously appeared. Point it out and I will be happy to apologize for pointing it out.

You set yourself up to this partner... Mr. I'm the best NBA capper of all-time ...still don't know what NBA has to do with tennis...yout still yet to explain that.

 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2007
Posts: 5347
Posted: #24
Quote Originally Posted by sparty444:

I love it... i'm an a-hole because I call you out for doing shady stuff. Thats typical shady attitude. Its my fault for pointing out past posts instead of you taking responsibility for it.

Please link the Fed to win Cincy bet? Is no sign of it anywhere...but yet it mysteriously appeared. Point it out and I will be happy to apologize for pointing it out.

You set yourself up to this partner... Mr. I'm the best NBA capper of all-time ...still don't know what NBA has to do with tennis...yout still yet to explain that.



Another horrible comeback, was expecting better from you Sparty.  Don't be upset that someone who doesn't know 50% of what you know about tennis can be a much better capper in this game you little envious prick.  Again please spend more time on capping rather then obsessing over me.  I am sure it would help you in the long run.  Good luck to you.


 
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2005
Posts: 10039
Posted: #25
Link please?
All Forums | Tennis
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming
Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Office Pools
The Covers community has
810,221
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 30 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service youtube logo facebook logo twitter logo instagram logo linkedin logo google news logo
Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2026 CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.