This guy has been anti Obama for a long time and they invited him to perform
What's really funny is how your trying to portray this inauguration party as being thrown by the White House or something affiliated with the Obama administration (who you mean 'they' to be...here comes the inevitable, "I never said who THEY was!!!").
If that's the case (and that is probably why you added two laughing heads when you're the laugh) you'd be wrong.
These were private companies who threw it in celebration of the inauguration.
Fiasco was performing at an event called StartUp Rockon which was sponsored by three companies, EventFarm, Fighter Interactive and Hypervocal.
0
Quote Originally Posted by JEFFMARKETCAP:
https://www.liveleak.com/view?i=522_1358777879
This guy has been anti Obama for a long time and they invited him to perform
What's really funny is how your trying to portray this inauguration party as being thrown by the White House or something affiliated with the Obama administration (who you mean 'they' to be...here comes the inevitable, "I never said who THEY was!!!").
If that's the case (and that is probably why you added two laughing heads when you're the laugh) you'd be wrong.
These were private companies who threw it in celebration of the inauguration.
Fiasco was performing at an event called StartUp Rockon which was sponsored by three companies, EventFarm, Fighter Interactive and Hypervocal.
But it was a party intended to be for the inauguration you idiot. Corporate sponsors spent millions on the inauguration for the white house so what is your point of bringing up those 3 companies? My point was that he was invited to a party to celebrate the inauguration and he is anti Obama. They should have known that. It's kind of like inviting you to a match.com event. Match.com isn't for homosexuals. It's straight dating only and you shouldn't be invited to such an event.
0
But it was a party intended to be for the inauguration you idiot. Corporate sponsors spent millions on the inauguration for the white house so what is your point of bringing up those 3 companies? My point was that he was invited to a party to celebrate the inauguration and he is anti Obama. They should have known that. It's kind of like inviting you to a match.com event. Match.com isn't for homosexuals. It's straight dating only and you shouldn't be invited to such an event.
But it was a party intended to be for the inauguration you idiot. Corporate sponsors spent millions on the inauguration for the white house so what is your point of bringing up those 3 companies? My point was that he was invited to a party to celebrate the inauguration and he is anti Obama. They should have known that. It's kind of like inviting you to a match.com event. Match.com isn't for homosexuals. It's straight dating only and you shouldn't be invited to such an event.
0
Quote Originally Posted by JEFFMARKETCAP:
But it was a party intended to be for the inauguration you idiot. Corporate sponsors spent millions on the inauguration for the white house so what is your point of bringing up those 3 companies? My point was that he was invited to a party to celebrate the inauguration and he is anti Obama. They should have known that. It's kind of like inviting you to a match.com event. Match.com isn't for homosexuals. It's straight dating only and you shouldn't be invited to such an event.
But it was a party intended to be for the inauguration you idiot. Corporate sponsors spent millions on the inauguration for the white house so what is your point of bringing up those 3 companies? My point was that he was invited to a party to celebrate the inauguration and he is anti Obama. They should have known that. It's kind of like inviting you to a match.com event. Match.com isn't for homosexuals. It's straight dating only and you shouldn't be invited to such an event.
Yeah, I'm the idiot.
Unfortunately, you didn't clarify who 'they' was. And that is key because most of the web thinks the 'they' is the White House or something affiliated with it making them look like the fools, or of course, O somehow. But not you! Just most of the web. You're the exception. Ok.
And given your views on this site and the way you conduct yourself, I wouldn't doubt you wouldn't believe such a thing and even if you knew what I was talking about in Post #2 before you made the OP (unlikely) you'd still like to give the implication the event was throw for O by someone associated with O and it wasn't of course, just for that extra rub....
It was three private companies unaffiliated with Obama so Obama is completely disconnected to the event.
Now you feign ignorance as suspected. "They" WAS the private companies according to you. Sure.
The gravitas given that is largely lost (as was your misleading 'they' which you didn't clarify and should be called out for).
(and god only knows if Skip and Oh Henry can even comprehend a morsel of the above).
Anything else I need to clarify? I'm here. But after this I'm charging by the hour.
0
Quote Originally Posted by JEFFMARKETCAP:
But it was a party intended to be for the inauguration you idiot. Corporate sponsors spent millions on the inauguration for the white house so what is your point of bringing up those 3 companies? My point was that he was invited to a party to celebrate the inauguration and he is anti Obama. They should have known that. It's kind of like inviting you to a match.com event. Match.com isn't for homosexuals. It's straight dating only and you shouldn't be invited to such an event.
Yeah, I'm the idiot.
Unfortunately, you didn't clarify who 'they' was. And that is key because most of the web thinks the 'they' is the White House or something affiliated with it making them look like the fools, or of course, O somehow. But not you! Just most of the web. You're the exception. Ok.
And given your views on this site and the way you conduct yourself, I wouldn't doubt you wouldn't believe such a thing and even if you knew what I was talking about in Post #2 before you made the OP (unlikely) you'd still like to give the implication the event was throw for O by someone associated with O and it wasn't of course, just for that extra rub....
It was three private companies unaffiliated with Obama so Obama is completely disconnected to the event.
Now you feign ignorance as suspected. "They" WAS the private companies according to you. Sure.
The gravitas given that is largely lost (as was your misleading 'they' which you didn't clarify and should be called out for).
(and god only knows if Skip and Oh Henry can even comprehend a morsel of the above).
Anything else I need to clarify? I'm here. But after this I'm charging by the hour.
Unfortunately, you didn't clarify who 'they' was. And that is key because most of the web thinks the 'they' is the White House or something affiliated with it making them look like the fools, or of course, O somehow. But not you! Just most of the web. You're the exception. Ok.
And given your views on this site and the way you conduct yourself, I wouldn't doubt you wouldn't believe such a thing and even if you knew what I was talking about in Post #2 before you made the OP (unlikely) you'd still like to give the implication the event was throw for O by someone associated with O and it wasn't of course, just for that extra rub....
It was three private companies unaffiliated with Obama so Obama is completely disconnected to the event.
Now you feign ignorance as suspected. "They" WAS the private companies according to you. Sure.
The gravitas given that is largely lost (as was your misleading 'they' which you didn't clarify and should be called out for).
(and god only knows if Skip and Oh Henry can even comprehend a morsel of the above).
Anything else I need to clarify? I'm here. But after this I'm charging by the hour.
Yes you are the idiot. If I were to do a poll on this site how what would the poll say about you? I am willing to say over 99% of the site thinks you are an idiot. Please make a thread titled Scalabrine poll. I dare you. I know you won't because you know what the outcome will be. I don't care who "they" are. "They are Obama supporters and "they" invited a guy who dislikes Obama.
0
Quote Originally Posted by scalabrine:
Yeah, I'm the idiot.
Unfortunately, you didn't clarify who 'they' was. And that is key because most of the web thinks the 'they' is the White House or something affiliated with it making them look like the fools, or of course, O somehow. But not you! Just most of the web. You're the exception. Ok.
And given your views on this site and the way you conduct yourself, I wouldn't doubt you wouldn't believe such a thing and even if you knew what I was talking about in Post #2 before you made the OP (unlikely) you'd still like to give the implication the event was throw for O by someone associated with O and it wasn't of course, just for that extra rub....
It was three private companies unaffiliated with Obama so Obama is completely disconnected to the event.
Now you feign ignorance as suspected. "They" WAS the private companies according to you. Sure.
The gravitas given that is largely lost (as was your misleading 'they' which you didn't clarify and should be called out for).
(and god only knows if Skip and Oh Henry can even comprehend a morsel of the above).
Anything else I need to clarify? I'm here. But after this I'm charging by the hour.
Yes you are the idiot. If I were to do a poll on this site how what would the poll say about you? I am willing to say over 99% of the site thinks you are an idiot. Please make a thread titled Scalabrine poll. I dare you. I know you won't because you know what the outcome will be. I don't care who "they" are. "They are Obama supporters and "they" invited a guy who dislikes Obama.
Yes you are the idiot. If I were to do a poll on this site how what would the poll say about you? I am willing to say over 99% of the site thinks you are an idiot. Please make a thread titled Scalabrine poll. I dare you. I know you won't because you know what the outcome will be. I don't care who "they" are. "They are Obama supporters and "they" invited a guy who dislikes Obama.
If people took a poll about whether they liked me, the end result of the poll would say people do not like me.
For me, that's a GOOD thing.
When too many or most people like you, you are likely trying to please everyone. I try to please NO ONE. Hence a poll result of very poor in terms of what they think of me is normal.
If you then took a poll as to whether people thought I could form cogent arguments, and keep up with a thread that I created, and return to it often to offer effective counter-arguments, I would get a VERY GOOD rating, even if it's with regard to a subject they perpetually disagree with me on (race). As far as being educated, I've probably read more today on current events and social issues than you do in a month, or several for that matter. Of course there are some that would fail me even in this area for their intense dislike of me because that is expected.
So, what is it you were saying. Oh the 'they' issue. You don't care about that. Case closed then.
0
Quote Originally Posted by JEFFMARKETCAP:
Yes you are the idiot. If I were to do a poll on this site how what would the poll say about you? I am willing to say over 99% of the site thinks you are an idiot. Please make a thread titled Scalabrine poll. I dare you. I know you won't because you know what the outcome will be. I don't care who "they" are. "They are Obama supporters and "they" invited a guy who dislikes Obama.
If people took a poll about whether they liked me, the end result of the poll would say people do not like me.
For me, that's a GOOD thing.
When too many or most people like you, you are likely trying to please everyone. I try to please NO ONE. Hence a poll result of very poor in terms of what they think of me is normal.
If you then took a poll as to whether people thought I could form cogent arguments, and keep up with a thread that I created, and return to it often to offer effective counter-arguments, I would get a VERY GOOD rating, even if it's with regard to a subject they perpetually disagree with me on (race). As far as being educated, I've probably read more today on current events and social issues than you do in a month, or several for that matter. Of course there are some that would fail me even in this area for their intense dislike of me because that is expected.
So, what is it you were saying. Oh the 'they' issue. You don't care about that. Case closed then.
I honestly cannot believe what a complete behind that you make of yourself on here. This isn't quite as bad as the "I guess police want race riots" thread where you got completely dominated, but it's still humorous and embarrassing for you.
Not sure what your problem is Slovak but you are very needy individual with extraordinarily low self-esteem to come back in this thread and lob invectives such as this.
I know the OP as far as his posting content and intention. I also know the mainstream media has been falsely portraying this story as described with the absence of information, that is, leading most to believe someone in the O administration hired this performer and he ended up shitting on them onstage. What a hoot.
That is of course, false, and given the way Jeff has conducted himself on this site (not unlike you but not nearly as bad), I find the need to call him out on it and I did.
I simply was fact-checking for him.
As far as the embarrassing thread about Trayvon, where is that Crod guy anyhow? Look who is still standing after 400 posts. He's gone like a fart in the wind, while I, having defended myself (in addition to answering some 90 posts in a row), am still here while all you have is "you were dominated." And you keep repeating it like a broken record because you still believe that somehow, police who thought a man was white during a crime against a black male, didn't provide him with what you receive each and every day and you don't even know or understand it: that is, privilege because of your race.
Keep playing the same fairy tale in your head child. No one cares anymore.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Slovak:
You sure are.
I honestly cannot believe what a complete behind that you make of yourself on here. This isn't quite as bad as the "I guess police want race riots" thread where you got completely dominated, but it's still humorous and embarrassing for you.
Not sure what your problem is Slovak but you are very needy individual with extraordinarily low self-esteem to come back in this thread and lob invectives such as this.
I know the OP as far as his posting content and intention. I also know the mainstream media has been falsely portraying this story as described with the absence of information, that is, leading most to believe someone in the O administration hired this performer and he ended up shitting on them onstage. What a hoot.
That is of course, false, and given the way Jeff has conducted himself on this site (not unlike you but not nearly as bad), I find the need to call him out on it and I did.
I simply was fact-checking for him.
As far as the embarrassing thread about Trayvon, where is that Crod guy anyhow? Look who is still standing after 400 posts. He's gone like a fart in the wind, while I, having defended myself (in addition to answering some 90 posts in a row), am still here while all you have is "you were dominated." And you keep repeating it like a broken record because you still believe that somehow, police who thought a man was white during a crime against a black male, didn't provide him with what you receive each and every day and you don't even know or understand it: that is, privilege because of your race.
Keep playing the same fairy tale in your head child. No one cares anymore.
My problem is the fact that 50% of the time you have no clue what the Hell you are talking about, yet you continue to defend the nonsense that you spew even though you know damn well that you were wrong. I remember a thread last year where DrJ put you right in your place after you filled a thread full of misinformation about a prison's location.
And even though you'll admit it, that c-rod guy came in here, made you his biitch and left, then came back multiple times and embarrassed you again.
DrJ put me in my place.... You don't even remember where he was talking about (I do, but I'll let you search for it) but yet, you remember he 'put me in my place'. Facts be damned. Actual story never quoted. And that was yet another thread, like this one, where specificity mattered. But of course, specificity matters for you when it's anyone but me...LOL
Crod, in that very thread, was made to look like one of the biggest fools on covers of all time when an actual trauma surgeon told him the bruises to Zimmerman's head were not as bad as they looked given the noted bloodshed. That was after I pleaded with him to make a SINGLE post showing ...well you know what that is by now...I can't keep regurgitating it like a mother bird vomiting to a chick...
And here, you don't even know the general tone of the mainstream media and skewed perception with regard to the the 'they' reference Jeff used, yet I don't know what I'm talking about when I call him out on it. Ultimately, he gives in and says he DOESN'T CARE who the 'they' was in post #7, but no matter, you need to keep massaging his ego by going against me.
I don't even think you understand what a sophisticated intricate argument is...
I think if it's not in plain sight, you just reject it and start calling people idiots. It's sad.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Slovak:
My problem is the fact that 50% of the time you have no clue what the Hell you are talking about, yet you continue to defend the nonsense that you spew even though you know damn well that you were wrong. I remember a thread last year where DrJ put you right in your place after you filled a thread full of misinformation about a prison's location.
And even though you'll admit it, that c-rod guy came in here, made you his biitch and left, then came back multiple times and embarrassed you again.
DrJ put me in my place.... You don't even remember where he was talking about (I do, but I'll let you search for it) but yet, you remember he 'put me in my place'. Facts be damned. Actual story never quoted. And that was yet another thread, like this one, where specificity mattered. But of course, specificity matters for you when it's anyone but me...LOL
Crod, in that very thread, was made to look like one of the biggest fools on covers of all time when an actual trauma surgeon told him the bruises to Zimmerman's head were not as bad as they looked given the noted bloodshed. That was after I pleaded with him to make a SINGLE post showing ...well you know what that is by now...I can't keep regurgitating it like a mother bird vomiting to a chick...
And here, you don't even know the general tone of the mainstream media and skewed perception with regard to the the 'they' reference Jeff used, yet I don't know what I'm talking about when I call him out on it. Ultimately, he gives in and says he DOESN'T CARE who the 'they' was in post #7, but no matter, you need to keep massaging his ego by going against me.
I don't even think you understand what a sophisticated intricate argument is...
I think if it's not in plain sight, you just reject it and start calling people idiots. It's sad.
Why don't you do an informal poll as to where people think 'Angola' is....
I'll give you 100,000-1 Angola AFRICA wins over Angola, La. Outside of anyone who resides in or near La..
And I'M the fool right?
Have you ever heard of Doctors without Borders? You don't think doctors do charity work in other countries (something I was shooting down in that thread because DrJ could have been implying he's involved with such a thing).
Come back in the thread and tell me how embarrassed and penitent YOU are when Angola, Africa wins and that is the singular statement with regards to geography, just as DrJ used it.
Please come back and report the results to us. I beg you(although I'd doubt a single person you hang out with could even tell you where Angola is period).
Why don't you do an informal poll as to where people think 'Angola' is....
I'll give you 100,000-1 Angola AFRICA wins over Angola, La. Outside of anyone who resides in or near La..
And I'M the fool right?
Have you ever heard of Doctors without Borders? You don't think doctors do charity work in other countries (something I was shooting down in that thread because DrJ could have been implying he's involved with such a thing).
Come back in the thread and tell me how embarrassed and penitent YOU are when Angola, Africa wins and that is the singular statement with regards to geography, just as DrJ used it.
Please come back and report the results to us. I beg you(although I'd doubt a single person you hang out with could even tell you where Angola is period).
It's not the fact that you were confused as to what he was talking about, it was the fact that you stuck your nose in a thread that didn't involve you in a poor attempt to take a jab at a guy whom you've had a history with here at covers and you got embarrassed because of it.
I've been embarrassed by DrJ? How's that exactly? What thread has he embarrassed me in? The only thing of consequence that he's ever said of consequence to me was that he doesn't like me. Wow. What a big man he is.
And again, I ask you to informally poll anyone you want outside of Louisiana and come back to me and tell me whether they say Angola is a country or in a US southern city. And then call them a buffoon or tell them they should be embarrassed for thinking it's a country...
0
Quote Originally Posted by Slovak:
It's not the fact that you were confused as to what he was talking about, it was the fact that you stuck your nose in a thread that didn't involve you in a poor attempt to take a jab at a guy whom you've had a history with here at covers and you got embarrassed because of it.
I've been embarrassed by DrJ? How's that exactly? What thread has he embarrassed me in? The only thing of consequence that he's ever said of consequence to me was that he doesn't like me. Wow. What a big man he is.
And again, I ask you to informally poll anyone you want outside of Louisiana and come back to me and tell me whether they say Angola is a country or in a US southern city. And then call them a buffoon or tell them they should be embarrassed for thinking it's a country...
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.
Established in 1995,
Hot Forum Topics
