Anyone else surprised to see this line move from -10 down to -8? Usually have a good read / feel on this sort of thing and I'm shocked to see so much Stanford $$$ come in?
I grabbed at -10 and feel i'm already in the hole on Saturday.
Anyone else surprised to see this line move from -10 down to -8? Usually have a good read / feel on this sort of thing and I'm shocked to see so much Stanford $$$ come in?
I grabbed at -10 and feel i'm already in the hole on Saturday.
Anyone else surprised to see this line move from -10 down to -8? Usually have a good read / feel on this sort of thing and I'm shocked to see so much Stanford $$$ come in?
I grabbed at -10 and feel i'm already in the hole on Saturday.
OK...so this confirms the line movement, there are plenty of backers of Stanford here at +10. I respect the markets, and the markets are moving against me on this one.
OK...so this confirms the line movement, there are plenty of backers of Stanford here at +10. I respect the markets, and the markets are moving against me on this one.
dont stress ... a vegas head game and line move .... game wont be close .. USC by DD .... but good that it moves dont ... nothing like tease it to -1.5 cause no way in hell they lose this game
dont stress ... a vegas head game and line move .... game wont be close .. USC by DD .... but good that it moves dont ... nothing like tease it to -1.5 cause no way in hell they lose this game
Not stressed. I just understand the importance of getting the right number, especially on large money action.
I kind of chuckle at the posters saying USC doesn't have speed at RB and "ONLY" 2 great WRs.....Stanford LY played 3 real offenses. Oregon, USC, and OK ST. check the stats from those games. This USC offense is at the least equal to LY team.
As far as the Cuse game, I think that told me more about Cuse then USC. Lets be honest, USC was in a look-a-head spot. That team was probably out most of the night in NYC partying it up. And yes, I was on CUSE +26.
Not stressed. I just understand the importance of getting the right number, especially on large money action.
I kind of chuckle at the posters saying USC doesn't have speed at RB and "ONLY" 2 great WRs.....Stanford LY played 3 real offenses. Oregon, USC, and OK ST. check the stats from those games. This USC offense is at the least equal to LY team.
As far as the Cuse game, I think that told me more about Cuse then USC. Lets be honest, USC was in a look-a-head spot. That team was probably out most of the night in NYC partying it up. And yes, I was on CUSE +26.
Not stressed. I just understand the importance of getting the right number, especially on large money action.
I kind of chuckle at the posters saying USC doesn't have speed at RB and "ONLY" 2 great WRs.....Stanford LY played 3 real offenses. Oregon, USC, and OK ST. check the stats from those games. This USC offense is at the least equal to LY team.
As far as the Cuse game, I think that told me more about Cuse then USC. Lets be honest, USC was in a look-a-head spot. That team was probably out most of the night in NYC partying it up. And yes, I was on CUSE +26.
Not stressed. I just understand the importance of getting the right number, especially on large money action.
I kind of chuckle at the posters saying USC doesn't have speed at RB and "ONLY" 2 great WRs.....Stanford LY played 3 real offenses. Oregon, USC, and OK ST. check the stats from those games. This USC offense is at the least equal to LY team.
As far as the Cuse game, I think that told me more about Cuse then USC. Lets be honest, USC was in a look-a-head spot. That team was probably out most of the night in NYC partying it up. And yes, I was on CUSE +26.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.