I think Oklahoma wins by 28 points. I wouldn't even tease KSU
I think Oklahoma wins by 28 points. I wouldn't even tease KSU
USC is getting better every game. They have a solid offense and an ugly defense that somehow does OK. That being said, Stanford should be able to move and score well. USC still needs to learn to tackle.
I think it should read Stanford -21.
-7.5 is nuts. ![]()
USC is getting better every game. They have a solid offense and an ugly defense that somehow does OK. That being said, Stanford should be able to move and score well. USC still needs to learn to tackle.
I think it should read Stanford -21.
-7.5 is nuts. ![]()
USC is getting better every game. They have a solid offense and an ugly defense that somehow does OK. That being said, Stanford should be able to move and score well. USC still needs to learn to tackle.
I think it should read Stanford -21.
-7.5 is nuts. ![]()
Even USC homers are betting on Stanford. Really, who's betting USC this week? ![]()
USC is getting better every game. They have a solid offense and an ugly defense that somehow does OK. That being said, Stanford should be able to move and score well. USC still needs to learn to tackle.
I think it should read Stanford -21.
-7.5 is nuts. ![]()
Even USC homers are betting on Stanford. Really, who's betting USC this week? ![]()
Even USC homers are betting on Stanford. Really, who's betting USC this week? ![]()
Im betting on USC large. Monte's Tampa 2 will be a challenge for Luck....Stanford will not roll through USC's defense like some are predicting. Stanford will also have their hands full with Barkely and Woods. Trust me.
Even USC homers are betting on Stanford. Really, who's betting USC this week? ![]()
Im betting on USC large. Monte's Tampa 2 will be a challenge for Luck....Stanford will not roll through USC's defense like some are predicting. Stanford will also have their hands full with Barkely and Woods. Trust me.
Im betting on USC large. Monte's Tampa 2 will be a challenge for Luck....Stanford will not roll through USC's defense like some are predicting. Stanford will also have their hands full with Barkely and Woods. Trust me.
Those are your reasons? USC fans hate, no despise, Monte's Tampa 2. Last year and this year, it really hasn't been too successful for the Trojans. Stanford put up 37 last year vs USC and really, everybody scored vs USC last season. Even this year, Ariz State put up 40+ points vs USC.
Stanford has a unique 3-TE set which makes their running game very potent. Luck has been doing a great job of audiblizing this year. He only had 160 yd passing when they destroyed washingtn last week.
I do think USC will get their yards. Robert Woods is the real deal. The question mark could be red zone conversions. USC's running game is average. If the Stanford pass D could do just enough to limit TDs then Stanford will crush USC.
But I'm starting to think the better bet might be the over. Both teams score a ton of points, but have done just enough defensively to give oddsmakers the impression it'll be a lower scoring game.
Im betting on USC large. Monte's Tampa 2 will be a challenge for Luck....Stanford will not roll through USC's defense like some are predicting. Stanford will also have their hands full with Barkely and Woods. Trust me.
Those are your reasons? USC fans hate, no despise, Monte's Tampa 2. Last year and this year, it really hasn't been too successful for the Trojans. Stanford put up 37 last year vs USC and really, everybody scored vs USC last season. Even this year, Ariz State put up 40+ points vs USC.
Stanford has a unique 3-TE set which makes their running game very potent. Luck has been doing a great job of audiblizing this year. He only had 160 yd passing when they destroyed washingtn last week.
I do think USC will get their yards. Robert Woods is the real deal. The question mark could be red zone conversions. USC's running game is average. If the Stanford pass D could do just enough to limit TDs then Stanford will crush USC.
But I'm starting to think the better bet might be the over. Both teams score a ton of points, but have done just enough defensively to give oddsmakers the impression it'll be a lower scoring game.
Those are your reasons? USC fans hate, no despise, Monte's Tampa 2. Last year and this year, it really hasn't been too successful for the Trojans. Stanford put up 37 last year vs USC and really, everybody scored vs USC last season. Even this year, Ariz State put up 40+ points vs USC.
Stanford has a unique 3-TE set which makes their running game very potent. Luck has been doing a great job of audiblizing this year. He only had 160 yd passing when they destroyed washingtn last week.
I do think USC will get their yards. Robert Woods is the real deal. The question mark could be red zone conversions. USC's running game is average. If the Stanford pass D could do just enough to limit TDs then Stanford will crush USC.
But I'm starting to think the better bet might be the over. Both teams score a ton of points, but have done just enough defensively to give oddsmakers the impression it'll be a lower scoring game.
Hey shithead, I already responded to you in MILFHUNTERS thread....bump that one you fucking retard.
Those are your reasons? USC fans hate, no despise, Monte's Tampa 2. Last year and this year, it really hasn't been too successful for the Trojans. Stanford put up 37 last year vs USC and really, everybody scored vs USC last season. Even this year, Ariz State put up 40+ points vs USC.
Stanford has a unique 3-TE set which makes their running game very potent. Luck has been doing a great job of audiblizing this year. He only had 160 yd passing when they destroyed washingtn last week.
I do think USC will get their yards. Robert Woods is the real deal. The question mark could be red zone conversions. USC's running game is average. If the Stanford pass D could do just enough to limit TDs then Stanford will crush USC.
But I'm starting to think the better bet might be the over. Both teams score a ton of points, but have done just enough defensively to give oddsmakers the impression it'll be a lower scoring game.
Hey shithead, I already responded to you in MILFHUNTERS thread....bump that one you fucking retard.
Those are your reasons? USC fans hate, no despise, Monte's Tampa 2. Last year and this year, it really hasn't been too successful for the Trojans. Stanford put up 37 last year vs USC and really, everybody scored vs USC last season. Even this year, Ariz State put up 40+ points vs USC.
Stanford has a unique 3-TE set which makes their running game very potent. Luck has been doing a great job of audiblizing this year. He only had 160 yd passing when they destroyed washingtn last week.
I do think USC will get their yards. Robert Woods is the real deal. The question mark could be red zone conversions. USC's running game is average. If the Stanford pass D could do just enough to limit TDs then Stanford will crush USC.
But I'm starting to think the better bet might be the over. Both teams score a ton of points, but have done just enough defensively to give oddsmakers the impression it'll be a lower scoring game.
Dude, you're the same fucking idiot that started running your mouth about a 5'7" 180 lb rb and a matchup that occured last year as part of your debate regarding this weeks matchup. That kind of shit doesn't even deserve a response but because I'm on USC, I felt obligated to give some of my reasoning as a response to your ridiculous bulshit. Fucking hilarious.
Those are your reasons? USC fans hate, no despise, Monte's Tampa 2. Last year and this year, it really hasn't been too successful for the Trojans. Stanford put up 37 last year vs USC and really, everybody scored vs USC last season. Even this year, Ariz State put up 40+ points vs USC.
Stanford has a unique 3-TE set which makes their running game very potent. Luck has been doing a great job of audiblizing this year. He only had 160 yd passing when they destroyed washingtn last week.
I do think USC will get their yards. Robert Woods is the real deal. The question mark could be red zone conversions. USC's running game is average. If the Stanford pass D could do just enough to limit TDs then Stanford will crush USC.
But I'm starting to think the better bet might be the over. Both teams score a ton of points, but have done just enough defensively to give oddsmakers the impression it'll be a lower scoring game.
Dude, you're the same fucking idiot that started running your mouth about a 5'7" 180 lb rb and a matchup that occured last year as part of your debate regarding this weeks matchup. That kind of shit doesn't even deserve a response but because I'm on USC, I felt obligated to give some of my reasoning as a response to your ridiculous bulshit. Fucking hilarious.
Hey shithead, I already responded to you in MILFHUNTERS thread....bump that one you fucking retard.
Stop getting your panties all bunched up. I read this first so I responded here.
Hey shithead, I already responded to you in MILFHUNTERS thread....bump that one you fucking retard.
Stop getting your panties all bunched up. I read this first so I responded here.
Dude, you're the same fucking idiot that started running your mouth about a 5'7" 180 lb rb and a matchup that occured last year as part of your debate regarding this weeks matchup. That kind of shit doesn't even deserve a response but because I'm on USC, I felt obligated to give some of my reasoning as a response to your ridiculous bulshit. Fucking hilarious.
The 5'7" 180 lb RB will have a tougher time getting tough yards in the red zone esp against a smashmouth D like Stanford. It's the difference b/t FGs and TDs.
Last year's game is important b/c it shows that Stanford can kick the shit out of "Monte's Tampa 2" that you think is so special. Oh yeah, and they scored 55 the year before that. Again, showing that Monte's scheme doesn't mean dick like you think it does.
Ignore it all you want. But there's more to the USC-Stanford game than simply fading an undefeated team who's played a soft schedule.
Dude, you're the same fucking idiot that started running your mouth about a 5'7" 180 lb rb and a matchup that occured last year as part of your debate regarding this weeks matchup. That kind of shit doesn't even deserve a response but because I'm on USC, I felt obligated to give some of my reasoning as a response to your ridiculous bulshit. Fucking hilarious.
The 5'7" 180 lb RB will have a tougher time getting tough yards in the red zone esp against a smashmouth D like Stanford. It's the difference b/t FGs and TDs.
Last year's game is important b/c it shows that Stanford can kick the shit out of "Monte's Tampa 2" that you think is so special. Oh yeah, and they scored 55 the year before that. Again, showing that Monte's scheme doesn't mean dick like you think it does.
Ignore it all you want. But there's more to the USC-Stanford game than simply fading an undefeated team who's played a soft schedule.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.