Seems HIGH to me....seems like most public perception is it willl go high tonight....i hear on 710am that this will be the "highest scoring BCS championship game ever",etc.....how can they blindly make that prediction?
This does seem like the best matchup since the USC/Texas rose bowl in 2006
I feel like the Under is the play....the line was as high as 75 and the public comment is OVER but the line is slowly creeping DOWN...
THOUGHTS?
0
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
Seems HIGH to me....seems like most public perception is it willl go high tonight....i hear on 710am that this will be the "highest scoring BCS championship game ever",etc.....how can they blindly make that prediction?
This does seem like the best matchup since the USC/Texas rose bowl in 2006
I feel like the Under is the play....the line was as high as 75 and the public comment is OVER but the line is slowly creeping DOWN...
REMEMBER THE TITANS? Vince young game ring any bells? Neither team is slowing either team Rover is the Call over out
How could I forget; I was sitting over the goal line in row 20 where Vince young ran in the last touchdown. It was such a debacle consider we left about 10 points on the field throughout that game
0
Quote Originally Posted by JUMBOJPC:
REMEMBER THE TITANS? Vince young game ring any bells? Neither team is slowing either team Rover is the Call over out
How could I forget; I was sitting over the goal line in row 20 where Vince young ran in the last touchdown. It was such a debacle consider we left about 10 points on the field throughout that game
Personally i was shocked it came out that low and its still the highest number ever of a BCS game. Oregon is so fast in play makin they have a avg of 10 more plays than anyone else in football. This game is a nightmare for def plus the fact of ot do u really think 1 team wont hit high 40's or possibly 50
0
Personally i was shocked it came out that low and its still the highest number ever of a BCS game. Oregon is so fast in play makin they have a avg of 10 more plays than anyone else in football. This game is a nightmare for def plus the fact of ot do u really think 1 team wont hit high 40's or possibly 50
Its OVER or nothing for me as far as the total goes..By no means is the OVER a lock but you would have to be CRAZY in my opinion to bet under on these two teams. Even if the game hits a snag and slows down for a few mins, these two teams can instantly put 21 on the board within 5min..GL 2nite!!
buy $BTC
0
Its OVER or nothing for me as far as the total goes..By no means is the OVER a lock but you would have to be CRAZY in my opinion to bet under on these two teams. Even if the game hits a snag and slows down for a few mins, these two teams can instantly put 21 on the board within 5min..GL 2nite!!
shoot under is more fovarable then over. often two scoring teams play each other, it end up low game. either will try to score but both def. will too. BOL
0
shoot under is more fovarable then over. often two scoring teams play each other, it end up low game. either will try to score but both def. will too. BOL
I was thinking OVER easy, but this is similar to the LSU vs. A&M game that screamed UNDER which I bought and loss. After considering this, knowing how Vegas thinks, seeing the total drop and reading the partial write up below, I would lean UNDER if I were playing it.
From the Covers Main Page writeup: "A couple Auburn players (perhaps mistakenly) suggested they would be
taking on a similar approach to what Cal did against Oregon.
“I
can't tell you the game plan, but we've got probably a little similar
(scheme) to what Cal did," said safety Zac Etheridge to the Portland Tribune.
Cal
held the top-ranked offense to just 15 points (six of those were from a
punt return TD) and they did so by slowing down the pace of the game.
The Bears did everything in the book, including taking a page out of
the Italian soccer team by faking injuries. Not saying that Auburn will
be as dirty, but let’s just say they'll manage to keep Duck momentum to
a minimum."
0
I was thinking OVER easy, but this is similar to the LSU vs. A&M game that screamed UNDER which I bought and loss. After considering this, knowing how Vegas thinks, seeing the total drop and reading the partial write up below, I would lean UNDER if I were playing it.
From the Covers Main Page writeup: "A couple Auburn players (perhaps mistakenly) suggested they would be
taking on a similar approach to what Cal did against Oregon.
“I
can't tell you the game plan, but we've got probably a little similar
(scheme) to what Cal did," said safety Zac Etheridge to the Portland Tribune.
Cal
held the top-ranked offense to just 15 points (six of those were from a
punt return TD) and they did so by slowing down the pace of the game.
The Bears did everything in the book, including taking a page out of
the Italian soccer team by faking injuries. Not saying that Auburn will
be as dirty, but let’s just say they'll manage to keep Duck momentum to
a minimum."
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.