For guys that KNOW what angles are this one a simple angle--bet against Heisman winner in Bowl Games. those banquet speeches take a lot away from practice time
2009-Mark ingram WIN 2008 Sam Bradford LOSE 2007 Tebow L 2006 Troy Smith L 05 Reggie Bush L 04 Matt Leinart W 03 Jason White L 02 Carson Palmer W 01-Eric Crouch L 00 Chris Weinke L
and if Newton winner as expected this will be one of three high % angles that support Oregon. For those of you that KNOW what angles are. FWIW
0
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
just posted this in Crash' thread....
For guys that KNOW what angles are this one a simple angle--bet against Heisman winner in Bowl Games. those banquet speeches take a lot away from practice time
2009-Mark ingram WIN 2008 Sam Bradford LOSE 2007 Tebow L 2006 Troy Smith L 05 Reggie Bush L 04 Matt Leinart W 03 Jason White L 02 Carson Palmer W 01-Eric Crouch L 00 Chris Weinke L
and if Newton winner as expected this will be one of three high % angles that support Oregon. For those of you that KNOW what angles are. FWIW
One has nothing to do with the other. If it plays out that way, it's just a coincidence.
like i said, banquet speeches take a lot from practice team. Maybe has nothing to do with it but 70% is 70%. More than coincidence in my opinion. You must lean auburn
timdog
0
Quote Originally Posted by thawv:
One has nothing to do with the other. If it plays out that way, it's just a coincidence.
like i said, banquet speeches take a lot from practice team. Maybe has nothing to do with it but 70% is 70%. More than coincidence in my opinion. You must lean auburn
For guys that KNOW what angles are this one a simple angle--bet against Heisman winner in Bowl Games.
so what you are saying is... bet against Heisman winner in Bowl Games is a valid handicapping angle... but bet against the MAC in Bowl Games is not a valid handicapping angle...
as a wise man once said... you're a fucking joke!
0
Quote Originally Posted by WhiteMice:
just posted this in Crash' thread....
For guys that KNOW what angles are this one a simple angle--bet against Heisman winner in Bowl Games.
so what you are saying is... bet against Heisman winner in Bowl Games is a valid handicapping angle... but bet against the MAC in Bowl Games is not a valid handicapping angle...
Auburn hasn't even begun bowl game practices yet so nothing for Cam, or Fairley for that matter to miss. No point in trying to factor into why you believe Oregon will somehow stop Cam when no one in the SEC could...but good luck.
0
Auburn hasn't even begun bowl game practices yet so nothing for Cam, or Fairley for that matter to miss. No point in trying to factor into why you believe Oregon will somehow stop Cam when no one in the SEC could...but good luck.
2009-Mark ingram WIN 2008 Sam Bradford LOSE 2007 Tebow L 2006 Troy Smith L 05 Reggie Bush L 04 Matt Leinart W 03 Jason White L 02 Carson Palmer W 01-Eric Crouch L 00 Chris Weinke L
so are you saying that this angle is based on the results over the past 10 years? what kind of angle would you call that? maybe... a trend?
0
Quote Originally Posted by WhiteMice:
2009-Mark ingram WIN 2008 Sam Bradford LOSE 2007 Tebow L 2006 Troy Smith L 05 Reggie Bush L 04 Matt Leinart W 03 Jason White L 02 Carson Palmer W 01-Eric Crouch L 00 Chris Weinke L
so are you saying that this angle is based on the results over the past 10 years? what kind of angle would you call that? maybe... a trend?
so what you are saying is... bet against Heisman winner in Bowl Games is a valid handicapping angle... but bet against the MAC in Bowl Games is not a valid handicapping angle...
no sir mr comprehension. your "fade the MAC" angle is indeed an angle if you have SPECIFIC stats to back it. You didnt As far as time-- 10 yrs thats all I have saved. It will be easy enuff to go back further if you want to research it. And since you wanted me to avoid posting in YOUR thread--but you have chosen to again hit mine--Ill be seeing you in yours
0
Quote Originally Posted by ApocalypseLater:
so what you are saying is... bet against Heisman winner in Bowl Games is a valid handicapping angle... but bet against the MAC in Bowl Games is not a valid handicapping angle...
no sir mr comprehension. your "fade the MAC" angle is indeed an angle if you have SPECIFIC stats to back it. You didnt As far as time-- 10 yrs thats all I have saved. It will be easy enuff to go back further if you want to research it. And since you wanted me to avoid posting in YOUR thread--but you have chosen to again hit mine--Ill be seeing you in yours
Auburn hasn't even begun bowl game practices yet so nothing for Cam, or Fairley for that matter to miss. No point in trying to factor into why you believe Oregon will somehow stop Cam when no one in the SEC could...but good luck.
Your getting ahead of me. Im not saying to bet Oreg simply based on the info Im simply offering the info. Yes Im on Oregon already. Mainly on 2 other Bowl Specific angles. Theyll be in my Game writeup. But for the record no one had stopped Tebow in 07 till Michigan crushed him
FR3SG thx and gl Bowls
0
Quote Originally Posted by stichael23:
Auburn hasn't even begun bowl game practices yet so nothing for Cam, or Fairley for that matter to miss. No point in trying to factor into why you believe Oregon will somehow stop Cam when no one in the SEC could...but good luck.
Your getting ahead of me. Im not saying to bet Oreg simply based on the info Im simply offering the info. Yes Im on Oregon already. Mainly on 2 other Bowl Specific angles. Theyll be in my Game writeup. But for the record no one had stopped Tebow in 07 till Michigan crushed him
no sir mr comprehension. your "fade the MAC" angle is indeed an angle if you have SPECIFIC stats to back it. You didnt As far as time-- 10 yrs thats all I have saved. It will be easy enuff to go back further if you want to research it. And since you wanted me to avoid posting in YOUR thread--but you have chosen to again hit mine--Ill be seeing you in yours
well, you didn't answer my question about what kind of angle this is, so i guess you must not know...
but as for your last statement... apples and oranges... you have created a DISCUSSION thread here... mine was a thread where i post my official plays... and you were hijacking it...
you invited discussion with this thread... it is not a thread where you are posting all of your plays...
stay off of my Bowl thread... you are not welcome!
0
Quote Originally Posted by WhiteMice:
no sir mr comprehension. your "fade the MAC" angle is indeed an angle if you have SPECIFIC stats to back it. You didnt As far as time-- 10 yrs thats all I have saved. It will be easy enuff to go back further if you want to research it. And since you wanted me to avoid posting in YOUR thread--but you have chosen to again hit mine--Ill be seeing you in yours
well, you didn't answer my question about what kind of angle this is, so i guess you must not know...
but as for your last statement... apples and oranges... you have created a DISCUSSION thread here... mine was a thread where i post my official plays... and you were hijacking it...
you invited discussion with this thread... it is not a thread where you are posting all of your plays...
stay off of my Bowl thread... you are not welcome!
i will be on your thread as you are on this one. It is not YOUR thread--it is one of many on a public forum i.e. Covers
And for the record to those that dont know trends are generalized and can be used in variety of situations Angles considerably more situational with specific stats to back them and not related to specific teams. Bowl games are kind of specific Your "fade the MAC" what specifics? As dogs as faves? And what criteria to back. Opinions dont count theyre like a-holes we all have them
My ncaa record is posted. Whats yours? and my top 7 games are Up. What are yours? if youd like a small wager on whose are better Im sure maybe a mod or mutual agreed poster can hold the money
Do yourself a favor do a quick google search of "betting football angles" and youll find some very basic ones for beginners like yourself. And maybe youll be able to comprehend how they differ from general trends
And by the way. youre early picks youll lose your ass
to those that think they know but cant comprehend the difference a quick google search might help you
0
i will be on your thread as you are on this one. It is not YOUR thread--it is one of many on a public forum i.e. Covers
And for the record to those that dont know trends are generalized and can be used in variety of situations Angles considerably more situational with specific stats to back them and not related to specific teams. Bowl games are kind of specific Your "fade the MAC" what specifics? As dogs as faves? And what criteria to back. Opinions dont count theyre like a-holes we all have them
My ncaa record is posted. Whats yours? and my top 7 games are Up. What are yours? if youd like a small wager on whose are better Im sure maybe a mod or mutual agreed poster can hold the money
Do yourself a favor do a quick google search of "betting football angles" and youll find some very basic ones for beginners like yourself. And maybe youll be able to comprehend how they differ from general trends
And by the way. youre early picks youll lose your ass
to those that think they know but cant comprehend the difference a quick google search might help you
i already told you i do not provide answers or helpful information to people who don't know how to maintain a reasonable level of respect... if anyone else asks me that question, i can answer at the snap of a finger...
i would never bet on an angle with nothing to back it up... but the fact that you aren't aware of how badly the MAC has performed in Bowl Games during the BCS era, is a strong indication of how much (or little) experience you have doing this...
most people don't need to ask that question, because they already know what the "fade the MAC" angle is all about... it's about... the MAC sucks, and can't stand up to other conferences... and yes, it is backed by actual results...
look them up for yourself if you care so much... it should take you all of 5 minutes...
but again... this is a discussion thread... what you did on my Bowl Thread was classless bullshit... don't do it again!
0
i already told you i do not provide answers or helpful information to people who don't know how to maintain a reasonable level of respect... if anyone else asks me that question, i can answer at the snap of a finger...
i would never bet on an angle with nothing to back it up... but the fact that you aren't aware of how badly the MAC has performed in Bowl Games during the BCS era, is a strong indication of how much (or little) experience you have doing this...
most people don't need to ask that question, because they already know what the "fade the MAC" angle is all about... it's about... the MAC sucks, and can't stand up to other conferences... and yes, it is backed by actual results...
look them up for yourself if you care so much... it should take you all of 5 minutes...
but again... this is a discussion thread... what you did on my Bowl Thread was classless bullshit... don't do it again!
i did nothing on your thread other than to ask you to provide facts for what you stated was an angle. You couldnt---not because you wouldnt but because you have no statistical facts or %'s to back an opinion
shove youre double standard bullshit up your ass. I will embark on any thread in this forum and DISCUSS either by asking questions or stating FACTS. As far as the rules of this forum I have not done a thing wrong by posting in YOUR thread and if you want to go cry again to the mods then do so. Grow up. You have no facts to back opinions and as the one guy said if someones opinions differ from yours theyre wrong. Even when facts prove that
Again you talking big and threatening proves what an ass you are. You can start with the f word again Mr Comprehension
0
i did nothing on your thread other than to ask you to provide facts for what you stated was an angle. You couldnt---not because you wouldnt but because you have no statistical facts or %'s to back an opinion
shove youre double standard bullshit up your ass. I will embark on any thread in this forum and DISCUSS either by asking questions or stating FACTS. As far as the rules of this forum I have not done a thing wrong by posting in YOUR thread and if you want to go cry again to the mods then do so. Grow up. You have no facts to back opinions and as the one guy said if someones opinions differ from yours theyre wrong. Even when facts prove that
Again you talking big and threatening proves what an ass you are. You can start with the f word again Mr Comprehension
For guys that KNOW what angles are this one a simple angle--bet against Heisman winner in Bowl Games. those banquet speeches take a lot away from practice time
2009-Mark ingram WIN 2008 Sam Bradford LOSE 2007 Tebow L 2006 Troy Smith L 05 Reggie Bush L 04 Matt Leinart W 03 Jason White L 02 Carson Palmer W 01-Eric Crouch L 00 Chris Weinke L
and if Newton winner as expected this will be one of three high % angles that support Oregon. For those of you that KNOW what angles are. FWIW
Love you picks and definitely respect your opinions. I think Tebow won and covered after he won the heisman. In 05 i think vince young deserved to win it that year as well as grossman in 01. It is a nice angle to look at but i wouldnt hang my hat solely on this as i am sure you are not. I liked auburn getting 3 not sure how much i like them now, even though i am an auburn fan. Either they lose or they blow out oregon. I wont be betting this game since i do not bet for or against my team, but may play the total. BOL. Always look forward to seeing your plays
0
Quote Originally Posted by WhiteMice:
just posted this in Crash' thread....
For guys that KNOW what angles are this one a simple angle--bet against Heisman winner in Bowl Games. those banquet speeches take a lot away from practice time
2009-Mark ingram WIN 2008 Sam Bradford LOSE 2007 Tebow L 2006 Troy Smith L 05 Reggie Bush L 04 Matt Leinart W 03 Jason White L 02 Carson Palmer W 01-Eric Crouch L 00 Chris Weinke L
and if Newton winner as expected this will be one of three high % angles that support Oregon. For those of you that KNOW what angles are. FWIW
Love you picks and definitely respect your opinions. I think Tebow won and covered after he won the heisman. In 05 i think vince young deserved to win it that year as well as grossman in 01. It is a nice angle to look at but i wouldnt hang my hat solely on this as i am sure you are not. I liked auburn getting 3 not sure how much i like them now, even though i am an auburn fan. Either they lose or they blow out oregon. I wont be betting this game since i do not bet for or against my team, but may play the total. BOL. Always look forward to seeing your plays
you're a MORON if you dont think winning the Heisman will take away from your bowl performance, particularly when you are going pro.....last few weeks have been crazy for Cam and he's already looking at the $$$ that is coming day after nc game...the ANGLE is absolutely NOT to be ignored as 70+% is statistical fact...Oregon wins this by 14+
0
you're a MORON if you dont think winning the Heisman will take away from your bowl performance, particularly when you are going pro.....last few weeks have been crazy for Cam and he's already looking at the $$$ that is coming day after nc game...the ANGLE is absolutely NOT to be ignored as 70+% is statistical fact...Oregon wins this by 14+
Love you picks and definitely respect your opinions. I think Tebowwon and covered after he won the heisman. In 05 i think vince young deserved to win it that year as well as grossman in 01. It is a nice angle to look at but i wouldnt hang my hat solely on this as i am sure you are not. I liked auburn getting 3 not sure how much i like them now, even though i am an auburn fan. Either they lose or they blow out oregon. I wont be betting this game since i do not bet for or against my team, but may play the total. BOL. Always look forward to seeing your plays
Michigan spanked his ass. And my pick is not made solely on this factor. And Auburn has been chalk since opened
MoPink thx GL your bowls
0
Quote Originally Posted by Masterkey14:
Love you picks and definitely respect your opinions. I think Tebowwon and covered after he won the heisman. In 05 i think vince young deserved to win it that year as well as grossman in 01. It is a nice angle to look at but i wouldnt hang my hat solely on this as i am sure you are not. I liked auburn getting 3 not sure how much i like them now, even though i am an auburn fan. Either they lose or they blow out oregon. I wont be betting this game since i do not bet for or against my team, but may play the total. BOL. Always look forward to seeing your plays
Michigan spanked his ass. And my pick is not made solely on this factor. And Auburn has been chalk since opened
Mice, Here are 3 Qbs that won the Heisman and lost the national Championship game. Sam Bradford, Troy Smith, and Jason White. What do they all have in Common?
Here are two Heisman Winners that won the National championship, Matt Leinart and Mark Ingram. What do they have in common?
0
Mice, Here are 3 Qbs that won the Heisman and lost the national Championship game. Sam Bradford, Troy Smith, and Jason White. What do they all have in Common?
Here are two Heisman Winners that won the National championship, Matt Leinart and Mark Ingram. What do they have in common?
Mice, Here are 3 Qbs that won the Heisman and lost the national Championship game. Sam Bradford, Troy Smith, and Jason White. What do they all have in Common?
Here are two Heisman Winners that won the National championship, Matt Leinart and Mark Ingram. What do they have in common?
i just answered that in other thread you posted it
0
Quote Originally Posted by JBoss:
Mice, Here are 3 Qbs that won the Heisman and lost the national Championship game. Sam Bradford, Troy Smith, and Jason White. What do they all have in Common?
Here are two Heisman Winners that won the National championship, Matt Leinart and Mark Ingram. What do they have in common?
i just answered that in other thread you posted it
Your answer was correct but here is the more important answer for the sake of BCS CHampionship. Bradford, Smith, and White lost to an SEC team in the national Championship. Leinart and Ingram didnt play a SEC team in the National Championship and won the game.
Often times Heisman winners win with stats playing against subpar competition from subpar conferences.
Good point about the Senior versus Junior fact though. Notch another one for Auburn there.
0
Your answer was correct but here is the more important answer for the sake of BCS CHampionship. Bradford, Smith, and White lost to an SEC team in the national Championship. Leinart and Ingram didnt play a SEC team in the National Championship and won the game.
Often times Heisman winners win with stats playing against subpar competition from subpar conferences.
Good point about the Senior versus Junior fact though. Notch another one for Auburn there.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.
Hot Forum Topics
