Look at the difference that Holliday has made to this Cardinals lineup. Since he came back, the Cards have averaged 12.5 hpg and 7 rpg scored. Why is this important? Well, because to me Galarraga is one of the worst starting pitchers in the league. Last year, his ERA was 4.49. When you look closer, his FIP was 5.09 (one of the worst in all majors) with an xFIP of 5.20. As you can see, his E-F is -.60, which was 20th highest to the negative last year. Add in the fact that his BABIP was a very lucky .261 (#14th luckiest) and we have a pitcher that is ready to regress further from his mediocre stats last year. Some will see that Armando got a win in his first start this year. But the fact that he gave up 2 HR's and only 33% of his outs were GB's is definitely a concern for his future starts. I don't really expect him to last past the 6th in this one, and then the 'stellar' 'Zona BP should step in. (They have an ERA of 7.5 and WHIP of 1.7 in 12 home-innings pitched this year)
Carpenter is Cards' best pitcher. He has allowed only 3 ER's this year in 13 innings with a 5 to 1 K/BB ratio in 2 starts this season. He is 4-0 against Arizona lifetime with an ERA of 2.58. I expect him to be solid again tonight.
Bottom line is that we have a #1 pitcher going up against a #5 in this one. I know Cards are on the road here, but even so, I expect them to get a comfortable win in this one. I have this one at -185 Cards, so to me there is defiinitely 'value' at -140.
#2: OVER 8 OAK/CHW (+107)
Cahill is a prime candidate for 'regression' this year, as he had the luckiest BABIP of .236 in 2010 and the 5th highest E-F to the negative of -1.21 (ERA of 2.97 but FIP of 4.19). That being said he has had success against the Sox in the past, with a 3.34 EAR in his 5 starts against them. This is a 'slightly' different lineup though. In 7 games against righty starters this year, White Sox are averaging 6.7 rpg and .350 OBP with 9 HR's. In addition, Adam Dunn is expected to start today after recovering from an apendectomy. Factor in that Cahill got a bit contract extension on Monday, and I expect him to give up a few runs in this one.
Edwin Jackson has had a spectacular start to his season so far but consistency has always been an issue with him. What else is interesting is that the current Athletics lineup is averaging .337 off him with an OBP of .400 and OPS close to .900. Now that's all good, but this is not why I'm making this OVER play tonight.
The real reason for this play is an interesting trend from 2010 in games involving Edwin Jackson. In games following an outing where he threw 110+ pitches, Jackson's games have averaged 10.78 runs per game. Now, I know there are a ton of other factors involed in those games, but it's still an interesting trend. Here's the breakdown:
#1: L 8-2 (10) #2: W 5-4 (9) #3: W 8-0 (8) #4: L 7-4 (11) #5: W 12-5 (17) #6: W 6-5 (11) #7: L 7-5 (12) #8: W 8-5 (13) #9: W 5-1 (6)
There were 9 such occurences last year and if we use 8 as an O/U, we would have gone 7-1-1. Well, Jackson threw 119 pitches in his last start. This trend is officially in play.
Good luck!
_________________ '10 MLBP: 20 - 8 @ 71% for +$13,130 '10 NFL: 58-44 @ 57% for +$9,600 '10 NFLP: 8-2 @ 80% for +$5,800 '10 CFB: 55-54 @ 51% for -$4,400 '10 CFBP: 4-4 @ 50% for -$400 '10 CBB: 39-18 @ 68% for +$19,200 '10 CBBP: 16-6 @ 73% for +$9,400
-------------------------------------------------------------- 'TOTAL: 200-136 @ 60% for +$52,330
"A dollar won is twice as sweet as a dollar earned."
0
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
#2: St Louis Cardinals -140
Look at the difference that Holliday has made to this Cardinals lineup. Since he came back, the Cards have averaged 12.5 hpg and 7 rpg scored. Why is this important? Well, because to me Galarraga is one of the worst starting pitchers in the league. Last year, his ERA was 4.49. When you look closer, his FIP was 5.09 (one of the worst in all majors) with an xFIP of 5.20. As you can see, his E-F is -.60, which was 20th highest to the negative last year. Add in the fact that his BABIP was a very lucky .261 (#14th luckiest) and we have a pitcher that is ready to regress further from his mediocre stats last year. Some will see that Armando got a win in his first start this year. But the fact that he gave up 2 HR's and only 33% of his outs were GB's is definitely a concern for his future starts. I don't really expect him to last past the 6th in this one, and then the 'stellar' 'Zona BP should step in. (They have an ERA of 7.5 and WHIP of 1.7 in 12 home-innings pitched this year)
Carpenter is Cards' best pitcher. He has allowed only 3 ER's this year in 13 innings with a 5 to 1 K/BB ratio in 2 starts this season. He is 4-0 against Arizona lifetime with an ERA of 2.58. I expect him to be solid again tonight.
Bottom line is that we have a #1 pitcher going up against a #5 in this one. I know Cards are on the road here, but even so, I expect them to get a comfortable win in this one. I have this one at -185 Cards, so to me there is defiinitely 'value' at -140.
#2: OVER 8 OAK/CHW (+107)
Cahill is a prime candidate for 'regression' this year, as he had the luckiest BABIP of .236 in 2010 and the 5th highest E-F to the negative of -1.21 (ERA of 2.97 but FIP of 4.19). That being said he has had success against the Sox in the past, with a 3.34 EAR in his 5 starts against them. This is a 'slightly' different lineup though. In 7 games against righty starters this year, White Sox are averaging 6.7 rpg and .350 OBP with 9 HR's. In addition, Adam Dunn is expected to start today after recovering from an apendectomy. Factor in that Cahill got a bit contract extension on Monday, and I expect him to give up a few runs in this one.
Edwin Jackson has had a spectacular start to his season so far but consistency has always been an issue with him. What else is interesting is that the current Athletics lineup is averaging .337 off him with an OBP of .400 and OPS close to .900. Now that's all good, but this is not why I'm making this OVER play tonight.
The real reason for this play is an interesting trend from 2010 in games involving Edwin Jackson. In games following an outing where he threw 110+ pitches, Jackson's games have averaged 10.78 runs per game. Now, I know there are a ton of other factors involed in those games, but it's still an interesting trend. Here's the breakdown:
#1: L 8-2 (10) #2: W 5-4 (9) #3: W 8-0 (8) #4: L 7-4 (11) #5: W 12-5 (17) #6: W 6-5 (11) #7: L 7-5 (12) #8: W 8-5 (13) #9: W 5-1 (6)
There were 9 such occurences last year and if we use 8 as an O/U, we would have gone 7-1-1. Well, Jackson threw 119 pitches in his last start. This trend is officially in play.
Good luck!
_________________ '10 MLBP: 20 - 8 @ 71% for +$13,130 '10 NFL: 58-44 @ 57% for +$9,600 '10 NFLP: 8-2 @ 80% for +$5,800 '10 CFB: 55-54 @ 51% for -$4,400 '10 CFBP: 4-4 @ 50% for -$400 '10 CBB: 39-18 @ 68% for +$19,200 '10 CBBP: 16-6 @ 73% for +$9,400
-------------------------------------------------------------- 'TOTAL: 200-136 @ 60% for +$52,330
"A dollar won is twice as sweet as a dollar earned."
Bodio - will send you another PM or email re
what we were talking about before (have some follow up stuff). Just been lazy -
but will get around to it.
Re: Edwin Jackson trend - wouldn't the right
measure to be look at the runs opposing teams had - as a few of those high
scores were due to his team bats (which should "in theory" have no correlation
to Jackson's previous pitch count).
Another potential way to play over is bet
1/2 units on both team totals - as most sites have OAK -110 for 3.5 and CHI -125
for 3.5. You push (with just slightly smaller juice) in a 4-3, 4-2, etc game.
Just surprised the team totals at 3.5 and not 4.
I have -108 and -123 on best lines for team
total overs...
0
Bodio - will send you another PM or email re
what we were talking about before (have some follow up stuff). Just been lazy -
but will get around to it.
Re: Edwin Jackson trend - wouldn't the right
measure to be look at the runs opposing teams had - as a few of those high
scores were due to his team bats (which should "in theory" have no correlation
to Jackson's previous pitch count).
Another potential way to play over is bet
1/2 units on both team totals - as most sites have OAK -110 for 3.5 and CHI -125
for 3.5. You push (with just slightly smaller juice) in a 4-3, 4-2, etc game.
Just surprised the team totals at 3.5 and not 4.
I have -108 and -123 on best lines for team
total overs...
yes he flat bets every game... personally i would choose a percentage of your starting roll for the day( between 2 and 4% )...and bet that on each play...so you lay bigger bets after a winning day...and smaller ones after a losing day
0
yes he flat bets every game... personally i would choose a percentage of your starting roll for the day( between 2 and 4% )...and bet that on each play...so you lay bigger bets after a winning day...and smaller ones after a losing day
Figured to start a new thread, since some 'gentlemen' are going at it in my first one.
GOOD LUCK today fellas
Hey Bodio,
Long time since I popped up in one of your threads. I still look for you everyday, but like you mentioned above, your threads are so littered with morons - it's gotten out of hand. But, hey - when you pick em like Bodio - you're gonna have a following.... it's just too bad the followers are so damn annoying.
Keep picking those winners B! And thanks for all the hard work!!
Kaufee
0
Quote Originally Posted by bodio:
0-1 today as Rangers lost.
Figured to start a new thread, since some 'gentlemen' are going at it in my first one.
GOOD LUCK today fellas
Hey Bodio,
Long time since I popped up in one of your threads. I still look for you everyday, but like you mentioned above, your threads are so littered with morons - it's gotten out of hand. But, hey - when you pick em like Bodio - you're gonna have a following.... it's just too bad the followers are so damn annoying.
Keep picking those winners B! And thanks for all the hard work!!
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.