Owner of america's most beloved sports franchise for 36 yrs. which is the longest tenure in yankee history under his tenure only 6 rings to show for. he's known to be putting the best team money can buy yr in and yr out. but it has only paid off 6x out of 36 tries. he disrespects yankee legends such as torre, jeter, billy martin, reggie jackson e.t.c. He is a complete control freak, who is a convicted liar and can be out of touch with reality.
P.S "derek jeter overrated" lol. go phills
0
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
Owner of america's most beloved sports franchise for 36 yrs. which is the longest tenure in yankee history under his tenure only 6 rings to show for. he's known to be putting the best team money can buy yr in and yr out. but it has only paid off 6x out of 36 tries. he disrespects yankee legends such as torre, jeter, billy martin, reggie jackson e.t.c. He is a complete control freak, who is a convicted liar and can be out of touch with reality.
Sparky10191 He's disrecpected jeter when he says that he parties to much and doesnt have what it takes to become captain, and a bunch B.S just to come up with a "Mastercard commercial" a yr later or so with him. ALSO just because hes active as an owner doesnt make him a good owner, see dan snyder, see jerry jones e.t.c
0
Sparky10191 He's disrecpected jeter when he says that he parties to much and doesnt have what it takes to become captain, and a bunch B.S just to come up with a "Mastercard commercial" a yr later or so with him. ALSO just because hes active as an owner doesnt make him a good owner, see dan snyder, see jerry jones e.t.c
Sparky10191 He's disrecpected jeter when he says that he parties to much and doesnt have what it takes to become captain, and a bunch B.S just to come up with a "Mastercard commercial" a yr later or so with him. ALSO just because hes active as an owner doesnt make him a good owner, see dan snyder, see jerry jones e.t.c
Yet he'll let Jeter make his own contract when his current one expires.
0
Quote Originally Posted by tone41:
Sparky10191 He's disrecpected jeter when he says that he parties to much and doesnt have what it takes to become captain, and a bunch B.S just to come up with a "Mastercard commercial" a yr later or so with him. ALSO just because hes active as an owner doesnt make him a good owner, see dan snyder, see jerry jones e.t.c
Yet he'll let Jeter make his own contract when his current one expires.
im not saying hes a bad player, i think him and omar vizquel are
simular. barry larkin as well. but he's overpaid w/o a doubt . which
makes him overrated, and clutch hitting in baseball doesnt exist
according to some historical baseball writers such as bill james.
"derek jeter is overrated"
0
im not saying hes a bad player, i think him and omar vizquel are
simular. barry larkin as well. but he's overpaid w/o a doubt . which
makes him overrated, and clutch hitting in baseball doesnt exist
according to some historical baseball writers such as bill james.
Most teams could only wish they had an owner like George Steinbrenner. Simple as that.
If you think Steinbrenner would have been able to run another franchise, outside of NYC, Boston, LA, Chicago... the same way he runs the Yankees you are delusional.
The Yankees operate in the Red. They make their money from Yes and other revenue streams.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Sparky10191:
Most teams could only wish they had an owner like George Steinbrenner. Simple as that.
If you think Steinbrenner would have been able to run another franchise, outside of NYC, Boston, LA, Chicago... the same way he runs the Yankees you are delusional.
The Yankees operate in the Red. They make their money from Yes and other revenue streams.
He throws around money to get players in a huge market. That shit wouldn't work ANYWHERE else, and you are ignorant if you think it would lol. Baseball needs a salary cap, and if it ever happened, the Yankees would not even be a contender.
0
He throws around money to get players in a huge market. That shit wouldn't work ANYWHERE else, and you are ignorant if you think it would lol. Baseball needs a salary cap, and if it ever happened, the Yankees would not even be a contender.
If you think Steinbrenner would have been able to run another franchise, outside of NYC, Boston, LA, Chicago... the same way he runs the Yankees you are delusional.
The Yankees operate in the Red. They make their money from Yes and other revenue streams.
0
Quote Originally Posted by jpero:
If you think Steinbrenner would have been able to run another franchise, outside of NYC, Boston, LA, Chicago... the same way he runs the Yankees you are delusional.
The Yankees operate in the Red. They make their money from Yes and other revenue streams.
His nickname is "The Boss" for a reason. Best owner any franchise can ask for. Only a hater or a clueless fck would create this topic, you're both though so im not surprised
0
His nickname is "The Boss" for a reason. Best owner any franchise can ask for. Only a hater or a clueless fck would create this topic, you're both though so im not surprised
Steinbrenner is a good owner only to a certain extent. Yes he does open the checkbook and spend more than anyone else. But it's questionable whether this method has really helped the team or baseball overall. Although the Yankees make the postseason every year they seem more like a collection of superstars than an actual team.
Steinbrenner is great at putting together talent but he hasn't really put together a team. From 1990 to 1993 while Steinbrenner was suspended, the Yankees were able to put together a great collection of home grown talent (Jeter, Williams, Rivera, Posada, etc.) that paved the way to four World Championships. Once he was able to regain control of the team he basically just chased after high profile, expensive free agents while disregarding the chemistry of the team (eg.: replacing Tino Martinez with Jason Giambi after the Yankees failed to win the World Series in 2001). He generally takes the philosophy of trading prospects for veterans, often depleting the farm system and the future for hopes of having a better team now.
The result of his antics have been an overpriced team with questionable chemistry that has not won the world series since 2000 (although this may change very soon). The overall price of free agents are higher because of him and many superstars who were brought up with another organization leave to come to the Yankees (which is bad for other franchises who can't afford to keep their players).
George Steinbrenner has not broken any rules in doing what he did. But to some extent he did help ruin baseball and he hasn't even put together a great team in the process. Now I'm not saying he's the only problem, but it's a stretch to say that he is a great owner.
0
Steinbrenner is a good owner only to a certain extent. Yes he does open the checkbook and spend more than anyone else. But it's questionable whether this method has really helped the team or baseball overall. Although the Yankees make the postseason every year they seem more like a collection of superstars than an actual team.
Steinbrenner is great at putting together talent but he hasn't really put together a team. From 1990 to 1993 while Steinbrenner was suspended, the Yankees were able to put together a great collection of home grown talent (Jeter, Williams, Rivera, Posada, etc.) that paved the way to four World Championships. Once he was able to regain control of the team he basically just chased after high profile, expensive free agents while disregarding the chemistry of the team (eg.: replacing Tino Martinez with Jason Giambi after the Yankees failed to win the World Series in 2001). He generally takes the philosophy of trading prospects for veterans, often depleting the farm system and the future for hopes of having a better team now.
The result of his antics have been an overpriced team with questionable chemistry that has not won the world series since 2000 (although this may change very soon). The overall price of free agents are higher because of him and many superstars who were brought up with another organization leave to come to the Yankees (which is bad for other franchises who can't afford to keep their players).
George Steinbrenner has not broken any rules in doing what he did. But to some extent he did help ruin baseball and he hasn't even put together a great team in the process. Now I'm not saying he's the only problem, but it's a stretch to say that he is a great owner.
If Steinbrenner was the owner of, say, the Reds when they were the "Big Red Machine", he would make sure that franchise never hit rock bottom. The money he had coming into the Yankees' franchise was insane and he spent it to get big names, to attract fans. He made trades to get big names to attract fans. Fans are attracted to winning teams(expect in Florida). The more fans, the more revenue. The more revenue, the more money. The more money, the big name free agents. The more free agents, the more fans keep coming.
I'm not going to go any further on this topic because like I mentioned before...arguing to jpero is like talking to a brick wall, and this arguement is irrelevant because we will never know.
0
If Steinbrenner was the owner of, say, the Reds when they were the "Big Red Machine", he would make sure that franchise never hit rock bottom. The money he had coming into the Yankees' franchise was insane and he spent it to get big names, to attract fans. He made trades to get big names to attract fans. Fans are attracted to winning teams(expect in Florida). The more fans, the more revenue. The more revenue, the more money. The more money, the big name free agents. The more free agents, the more fans keep coming.
I'm not going to go any further on this topic because like I mentioned before...arguing to jpero is like talking to a brick wall, and this arguement is irrelevant because we will never know.
Steinbrenner is a good owner only to a certain extent. Yes he does open the checkbook and spend more than anyone else. But it's questionable whether this method has really helped the team or baseball overall. Although the Yankees make the postseason every year they seem more like a collection of superstars than an actual team.
Steinbrenner is great at putting together talent but he hasn't really put together a team. From 1990 to 1993 while Steinbrenner was suspended, the Yankees were able to put together a great collection of home grown talent (Jeter, Williams, Rivera, Posada, etc.) that paved the way to four World Championships. Once he was able to regain control of the team he basically just chased after high profile, expensive free agents while disregarding the chemistry of the team (eg.: replacing Tino Martinez with Jason Giambi after the Yankees failed to win the World Series in 2001). He generally takes the philosophy of trading prospects for veterans, often depleting the farm system and the future for hopes of having a better team now.
The result of his antics have been an overpriced team with questionable chemistry that has not won the world series since 2000 (although this may change very soon). The overall price of free agents are higher because of him and many superstars who were brought up with another organization leave to come to the Yankees (which is bad for other franchises who can't afford to keep their players).
George Steinbrenner has not broken any rules in doing what he did. But to some extent he did help ruin baseball and he hasn't even put together a great team in the process. Now I'm not saying he's the only problem, but it's a stretch to say that he is a great owner.
I've said the same thing before and was chastised as a Yankee hating idiot.
0
Quote Originally Posted by johnboy7541:
Steinbrenner is a good owner only to a certain extent. Yes he does open the checkbook and spend more than anyone else. But it's questionable whether this method has really helped the team or baseball overall. Although the Yankees make the postseason every year they seem more like a collection of superstars than an actual team.
Steinbrenner is great at putting together talent but he hasn't really put together a team. From 1990 to 1993 while Steinbrenner was suspended, the Yankees were able to put together a great collection of home grown talent (Jeter, Williams, Rivera, Posada, etc.) that paved the way to four World Championships. Once he was able to regain control of the team he basically just chased after high profile, expensive free agents while disregarding the chemistry of the team (eg.: replacing Tino Martinez with Jason Giambi after the Yankees failed to win the World Series in 2001). He generally takes the philosophy of trading prospects for veterans, often depleting the farm system and the future for hopes of having a better team now.
The result of his antics have been an overpriced team with questionable chemistry that has not won the world series since 2000 (although this may change very soon). The overall price of free agents are higher because of him and many superstars who were brought up with another organization leave to come to the Yankees (which is bad for other franchises who can't afford to keep their players).
George Steinbrenner has not broken any rules in doing what he did. But to some extent he did help ruin baseball and he hasn't even put together a great team in the process. Now I'm not saying he's the only problem, but it's a stretch to say that he is a great owner.
I've said the same thing before and was chastised as a Yankee hating idiot.
If Steinbrenner was the owner of, say, the Reds when they were the "Big Red Machine", he would make sure that franchise never hit rock bottom. The money he had coming into the Yankees' franchise was insane and he spent it to get big names, to attract fans. He made trades to get big names to attract fans. Fans are attracted to winning teams(expect in Florida). The more fans, the more revenue. The more revenue, the more money. The more money, the big name free agents. The more free agents, the more fans keep coming.
I'm not going to go any further on this topic because like I mentioned before...arguing to jpero is like talking to a brick wall, and this arguement is irrelevant because we will never know.
You are the brick wall. Your logic and overall stance only holds merit when talking with Yankee fans who have no regard for competitive balance or the historical roots of baseball.
If people arent sucking on the Yankees balls they are idiots in yoru mind. You throw out objective and sensible arguments that go against your bias belief.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Sparky10191:
If Steinbrenner was the owner of, say, the Reds when they were the "Big Red Machine", he would make sure that franchise never hit rock bottom. The money he had coming into the Yankees' franchise was insane and he spent it to get big names, to attract fans. He made trades to get big names to attract fans. Fans are attracted to winning teams(expect in Florida). The more fans, the more revenue. The more revenue, the more money. The more money, the big name free agents. The more free agents, the more fans keep coming.
I'm not going to go any further on this topic because like I mentioned before...arguing to jpero is like talking to a brick wall, and this arguement is irrelevant because we will never know.
You are the brick wall. Your logic and overall stance only holds merit when talking with Yankee fans who have no regard for competitive balance or the historical roots of baseball.
If people arent sucking on the Yankees balls they are idiots in yoru mind. You throw out objective and sensible arguments that go against your bias belief.
If Steinbrenner was the owner of, say, the Reds when they were the "Big Red Machine", he would make sure that franchise never hit rock bottom. The money he had coming into the Yankees' franchise was insane and he spent it to get big names, to attract fans. He made trades to get big names to attract fans. Fans are attracted to winning teams(expect in Florida). The more fans, the more revenue. The more revenue, the more money. The more money, the big name free agents. The more free agents, the more fans keep coming.
I'm not going to go any further on this topic because like I mentioned before...arguing to jpero is like talking to a brick wall, and this arguement is irrelevant because we will never know.
The revenue in a smaller market could never warrant that kind of payroll. Hes a solid owner who has taken advantage of his teams place in the marketplace.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Sparky10191:
If Steinbrenner was the owner of, say, the Reds when they were the "Big Red Machine", he would make sure that franchise never hit rock bottom. The money he had coming into the Yankees' franchise was insane and he spent it to get big names, to attract fans. He made trades to get big names to attract fans. Fans are attracted to winning teams(expect in Florida). The more fans, the more revenue. The more revenue, the more money. The more money, the big name free agents. The more free agents, the more fans keep coming.
I'm not going to go any further on this topic because like I mentioned before...arguing to jpero is like talking to a brick wall, and this arguement is irrelevant because we will never know.
The revenue in a smaller market could never warrant that kind of payroll. Hes a solid owner who has taken advantage of his teams place in the marketplace.
The revenue in a smaller market could never warrant that kind of payroll. Hes a solid owner who has taken advantage of his teams place in the marketplace.
Sparky doesn't acknowledge their demographic/geographic built in advantage over every franchise. He sees nothing wrong with it and thinks every team can operate teh same if they actually wanted.
0
Quote Originally Posted by RobK45:
The revenue in a smaller market could never warrant that kind of payroll. Hes a solid owner who has taken advantage of his teams place in the marketplace.
Sparky doesn't acknowledge their demographic/geographic built in advantage over every franchise. He sees nothing wrong with it and thinks every team can operate teh same if they actually wanted.
yea man sparky idk about your theory that he made alot of money with the yankees. the guy was filthy rich from the beginning of time. i do find it interesting when he was suspended that's when the Yankee dynasty was being built. my opinion hes just an egotistical freak jut like al davis and so forth.
0
yea man sparky idk about your theory that he made alot of money with the yankees. the guy was filthy rich from the beginning of time. i do find it interesting when he was suspended that's when the Yankee dynasty was being built. my opinion hes just an egotistical freak jut like al davis and so forth.
You are the brick wall. Your logic and overall stance only holds merit when talking with Yankee fans who have no regard for competitive balance or the historical roots of baseball.
If people arent sucking on the Yankees balls they are idiots in yoru mind. You throw out objective and sensible arguments that go against your bias belief.
Says the guy who thinks the Orioles will make the playoffs in 2 years.
That is by far the most amusing sentence I have ever saw you write in my entire time here. Thank you so much for that laugh.
0
Quote Originally Posted by jpero:
You are the brick wall. Your logic and overall stance only holds merit when talking with Yankee fans who have no regard for competitive balance or the historical roots of baseball.
If people arent sucking on the Yankees balls they are idiots in yoru mind. You throw out objective and sensible arguments that go against your bias belief.
Says the guy who thinks the Orioles will make the playoffs in 2 years.
That is by far the most amusing sentence I have ever saw you write in my entire time here. Thank you so much for that laugh.
yea man sparky idk about your theory that he made alot of money with the yankees. the guy was filthy rich from the beginning of time. i do find it interesting when he was suspended that's when the Yankee dynasty was being built. my opinion hes just an egotistical freak jut like al davis and so forth.
Exactly...I think, with the money he had when he bought the Yankees, he could have turned another franchise around.
Here is what I'm saying...if he bought any other franchise at the time he bought the Yankees, that team, right now, would have a bigger revenue income than it has right now maybe with the exception of about 2-3 teams.
0
Quote Originally Posted by tone41:
yea man sparky idk about your theory that he made alot of money with the yankees. the guy was filthy rich from the beginning of time. i do find it interesting when he was suspended that's when the Yankee dynasty was being built. my opinion hes just an egotistical freak jut like al davis and so forth.
Exactly...I think, with the money he had when he bought the Yankees, he could have turned another franchise around.
Here is what I'm saying...if he bought any other franchise at the time he bought the Yankees, that team, right now, would have a bigger revenue income than it has right now maybe with the exception of about 2-3 teams.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.
Hot Forum Topics
