2011 Results TO DATE: Sides: 75-77 12-6 PL PLAYS 22-32-5 Over/Unders OVERALL: -$12385
SUNDAYS CARD:
BUFFALO 6000/3000 ***Game of the year*** BUFFALO -.5 (reg)5000/4000 BUFFALO -1.5 2000/3000
BOSTON 1000/1100 NYR -.5 (reg) 1000/1150 CAROLINA 2000/2300 CAROLINA -.5 (reg) 1000/1500 SAN JOSE 3500/2500 SAN JOSE -.5 (reg) 1500/1650 ANAHEIM 2700/2000 ANAHEIM -.5 (reg) 1000/1150
REALLY LIKE THIS CARD AND VERY CONFIDENT WITH THE TPICKS. IF I GET SMASHED TODAY I'LL HAVE TO START NEW AND DROP MY BETS OR QUIT BETTING NHL FOR AWHILE. BOL
2011 Results TO DATE: Sides: 75-77 12-6 PL PLAYS 22-32-5 Over/Unders OVERALL: -$12385
SUNDAYS CARD:
BUFFALO 6000/3000 ***Game of the year*** BUFFALO -.5 (reg)5000/4000 BUFFALO -1.5 2000/3000
BOSTON 1000/1100 NYR -.5 (reg) 1000/1150 CAROLINA 2000/2300 CAROLINA -.5 (reg) 1000/1500 SAN JOSE 3500/2500 SAN JOSE -.5 (reg) 1500/1650 ANAHEIM 2700/2000 ANAHEIM -.5 (reg) 1000/1150
REALLY LIKE THIS CARD AND VERY CONFIDENT WITH THE TPICKS. IF I GET SMASHED TODAY I'LL HAVE TO START NEW AND DROP MY BETS OR QUIT BETTING NHL FOR AWHILE. BOL
If you are betting this high, you HAVE to be doing it on matchbook. On every single bet you place you are costing yourself 5-10 cents juice. Over the long haul that is going to destroy you. (if you really are betting tens of thousands of dollars)
0
The thing to me is...
If you are betting this high, you HAVE to be doing it on matchbook. On every single bet you place you are costing yourself 5-10 cents juice. Over the long haul that is going to destroy you. (if you really are betting tens of thousands of dollars)
Buffalois 19-26 against the money line in home games after winning their previous game in overtime since 1996.
Lol these trends are meaningless.
Teams change from year to year. When I cap a game im not looking at 1996 or 2002 results for example. I'm looking at the current present day conditions and teams. Im also looking at the fact that Islanders had 183PIMs last game and are playing Koskinen vs Miller in a must 2 points for Buffalo on home ice.
Does that trend take into account that? No.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Societic-Hustle:
Buffalois 19-26 against the money line in home games after winning their previous game in overtime since 1996.
Lol these trends are meaningless.
Teams change from year to year. When I cap a game im not looking at 1996 or 2002 results for example. I'm looking at the current present day conditions and teams. Im also looking at the fact that Islanders had 183PIMs last game and are playing Koskinen vs Miller in a must 2 points for Buffalo on home ice.
Teams change from year to year. When I cap a game im not looking at 1996 or 2002 results for example. I'm looking at the current present day conditions and teams. Im also looking at the fact that Islanders had 183PIMs last game and are playing Koskinen vs Miller in a must 2 points for Buffalo on home ice.
Does that trend take into account that? No.
Nothing you said here is wrong, but it all has to be relative to the line. You can ALWAYS pick the team you think is going to win, that will never change. But the question is what do you think this line should be? Obviously to bet it at -200 you think Buffalo should be higher. So the question is, what should the line be? Simply betting on personal opinions of who wins the game without making it relative to the line just doesn't work.
0
Quote Originally Posted by neverlayoff:
Lol these trends are meaningless.
Teams change from year to year. When I cap a game im not looking at 1996 or 2002 results for example. I'm looking at the current present day conditions and teams. Im also looking at the fact that Islanders had 183PIMs last game and are playing Koskinen vs Miller in a must 2 points for Buffalo on home ice.
Does that trend take into account that? No.
Nothing you said here is wrong, but it all has to be relative to the line. You can ALWAYS pick the team you think is going to win, that will never change. But the question is what do you think this line should be? Obviously to bet it at -200 you think Buffalo should be higher. So the question is, what should the line be? Simply betting on personal opinions of who wins the game without making it relative to the line just doesn't work.
Player Trevor Gillies LW Elig March 1 - Suspension - 2/13/11 Jack Hillen D Ques Sun - Concussion - 2/12/11 Matt Martin LW Elig Feb 22 - Suspension - 2/13/11 Blake Comeau RW Out indefinitely - Concussion - 2/11/11
Buffalo off 3 days rest and apparently you chose one menaingless trend that is really laughable and missed out the actual important ones that reflect present day and most of their play in February and 2011 which is relevant:
Sabres are 4-0 in their last 4 games as a favorite. Sabres are 5-1 in their last 6 overall. Sabres are 5-1 in their last 6 Sunday games. Sabres are 5-1 in their last 6 vs. Eastern Conference. Sabres are 6-2 in their last 8 vs. a team with a winning % below .400. Sabres are 8-3 in their last 11 games as a home favorite. Sabres are 5-2 in their last 7 games as a favorite of -201 or greater. Sabres are 5-2 in their last 7 games as a home favorite of -201 or greater.
Thanks for your best wishes. Seems like since, "Buffalo is 19-26 against the money line in home games after winning their previous game in overtime since 1996" you should make a large wager on the Islanders in this spot.
0
This is who Islanders lost on Friday:
Player Trevor Gillies LW Elig March 1 - Suspension - 2/13/11 Jack Hillen D Ques Sun - Concussion - 2/12/11 Matt Martin LW Elig Feb 22 - Suspension - 2/13/11 Blake Comeau RW Out indefinitely - Concussion - 2/11/11
Buffalo off 3 days rest and apparently you chose one menaingless trend that is really laughable and missed out the actual important ones that reflect present day and most of their play in February and 2011 which is relevant:
Sabres are 4-0 in their last 4 games as a favorite. Sabres are 5-1 in their last 6 overall. Sabres are 5-1 in their last 6 Sunday games. Sabres are 5-1 in their last 6 vs. Eastern Conference. Sabres are 6-2 in their last 8 vs. a team with a winning % below .400. Sabres are 8-3 in their last 11 games as a home favorite. Sabres are 5-2 in their last 7 games as a favorite of -201 or greater. Sabres are 5-2 in their last 7 games as a home favorite of -201 or greater.
Thanks for your best wishes. Seems like since, "Buffalo is 19-26 against the money line in home games after winning their previous game in overtime since 1996" you should make a large wager on the Islanders in this spot.
The current matchbook price for Buffalo ML is -183.
-If you put that $6000 on the matchbook price, you would get back $3278.
-Or you could have done to win $3000 and would have only had to put down $5490.
To summarize, you could have added $278 to your profit, or shaved $510 off your risk.
I know me telling you the difference in price isn't breaking news to you. BUT a guy who is betting as much as you claim to be betting HAS to do whatever it takes to get the best line. There is no way you will turn long haul profit by taking the lines you do when the true value of the line is far away from the line you are getting. Just no way.
0
Just for comparisons sake....
You bet Buffalo -200 for $6000 to win $3000.
The current matchbook price for Buffalo ML is -183.
-If you put that $6000 on the matchbook price, you would get back $3278.
-Or you could have done to win $3000 and would have only had to put down $5490.
To summarize, you could have added $278 to your profit, or shaved $510 off your risk.
I know me telling you the difference in price isn't breaking news to you. BUT a guy who is betting as much as you claim to be betting HAS to do whatever it takes to get the best line. There is no way you will turn long haul profit by taking the lines you do when the true value of the line is far away from the line you are getting. Just no way.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.