Congrats on your nice little run as of late. ![]()
Just out of curiosity you said you were up 3 units last night but for instance your Nashville total had -136 worth of juice along with it. If your playing 1 unit as stated wouldn't you have won $73.53 on that wager instead of $100 because of the price???
GL tonight!!!!![]()
Congrats on your nice little run as of late. ![]()
Just out of curiosity you said you were up 3 units last night but for instance your Nashville total had -136 worth of juice along with it. If your playing 1 unit as stated wouldn't you have won $73.53 on that wager instead of $100 because of the price???
GL tonight!!!!![]()
Congrats on your nice little run as of late. ![]()
Just out of curiosity you said you were up 3 units last night but for instance your Nashville total had -136 worth of juice along with it. If your playing 1 unit as stated wouldn't you have won $73.53 on that wager instead of $100 because of the price???
GL tonight!!!!![]()
LORD NO. I'm the guy who's always telling people to express their units using 1 as a base unit instead of European syle... ALL WAGERS FOR 1 UNIT means - risk one if plus money, win one if - money. ![]()
Congrats on your nice little run as of late. ![]()
Just out of curiosity you said you were up 3 units last night but for instance your Nashville total had -136 worth of juice along with it. If your playing 1 unit as stated wouldn't you have won $73.53 on that wager instead of $100 because of the price???
GL tonight!!!!![]()
LORD NO. I'm the guy who's always telling people to express their units using 1 as a base unit instead of European syle... ALL WAGERS FOR 1 UNIT means - risk one if plus money, win one if - money. ![]()
LORD NO. I'm the guy who's always telling people to express their units using 1 as a base unit instead of European syle... ALL WAGERS FOR 1 UNIT means - risk one if plus money, win one if - money. ![]()
Agreed. Anything else is wizardry!
LORD NO. I'm the guy who's always telling people to express their units using 1 as a base unit instead of European syle... ALL WAGERS FOR 1 UNIT means - risk one if plus money, win one if - money. ![]()
Agreed. Anything else is wizardry!
LORD NO. I'm the guy who's always telling people to express their units using 1 as a base unit instead of European syle... ALL WAGERS FOR 1 UNIT means - risk one if plus money, win one if - money. ![]()
LORD NO. I'm the guy who's always telling people to express their units using 1 as a base unit instead of European syle... ALL WAGERS FOR 1 UNIT means - risk one if plus money, win one if - money. ![]()
Its actually really noticeable on the days after I take a bad beating - especially with the amount of juice some of these plays necessitate ![]()
I'm hoping that is not the case tomorrow morning ![]()
Its actually really noticeable on the days after I take a bad beating - especially with the amount of juice some of these plays necessitate ![]()
I'm hoping that is not the case tomorrow morning ![]()
LORD NO. I'm the guy who's always telling people to express their units using 1 as a base unit instead of European syle... ALL WAGERS FOR 1 UNIT means - risk one if plus money, win one if - money. ![]()
Happy always adjusts his units based on what he said above ![]()
LORD NO. I'm the guy who's always telling people to express their units using 1 as a base unit instead of European syle... ALL WAGERS FOR 1 UNIT means - risk one if plus money, win one if - money. ![]()
Happy always adjusts his units based on what he said above ![]()
Ya, they ARE juicy, geez... but when I cap them I ask myself the following question: TRUE or FALSE - This game is likely to be at most TIED 2-2 late in the third period...
If the answer is TRUE then I am generally willing to put my knowledge, skill and instincts to the test and lay the -120 or whatever it takes since I really feel I can hit between 55-60 per cent based on my ability to judge the games based on the criteria that I find most important.
That is why I refuse to get sucked into plus money totals simply for the sake of taking back a tag. I like that strategy a lot when betting sides though, just doesn't work for me with totals. As long as I am making a profit I will continue to lay the juice I suppose.
Ya, they ARE juicy, geez... but when I cap them I ask myself the following question: TRUE or FALSE - This game is likely to be at most TIED 2-2 late in the third period...
If the answer is TRUE then I am generally willing to put my knowledge, skill and instincts to the test and lay the -120 or whatever it takes since I really feel I can hit between 55-60 per cent based on my ability to judge the games based on the criteria that I find most important.
That is why I refuse to get sucked into plus money totals simply for the sake of taking back a tag. I like that strategy a lot when betting sides though, just doesn't work for me with totals. As long as I am making a profit I will continue to lay the juice I suppose.
Ya, they ARE juicy, geez... but when I cap them I ask myself the following question: TRUE or FALSE - This game is likely to be at most TIED 2-2 late in the third period...
If the answer is TRUE then I am generally willing to put my knowledge, skill and instincts to the test and lay the -120 or whatever it takes since I really feel I can hit between 55-60 per cent based on my ability to judge the games based on the criteria that I find most important.
That is why I refuse to get sucked into plus money totals simply for the sake of taking back a tag. I like that strategy a lot when betting sides though, just doesn't work for me with totals. As long as I am making a profit I will continue to lay the juice I suppose.
Can't argue with success. Keep on rolling buddy ![]()
Ya, they ARE juicy, geez... but when I cap them I ask myself the following question: TRUE or FALSE - This game is likely to be at most TIED 2-2 late in the third period...
If the answer is TRUE then I am generally willing to put my knowledge, skill and instincts to the test and lay the -120 or whatever it takes since I really feel I can hit between 55-60 per cent based on my ability to judge the games based on the criteria that I find most important.
That is why I refuse to get sucked into plus money totals simply for the sake of taking back a tag. I like that strategy a lot when betting sides though, just doesn't work for me with totals. As long as I am making a profit I will continue to lay the juice I suppose.
Can't argue with success. Keep on rolling buddy ![]()

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.