All Forums | NBA Betting Forum

and thats why you dont take out hibbert.

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 888
Posts: 27
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2006
Posts: 3757
Posted: #1
For all those who said taking out your best rim defender last game would have not made a difference.

LeChoke had to pass it off, because kryptonite was there resulting in a turnover
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2009
Posts: 672
Posted: #2
2.2 seconds vs 17 seconds..lol obviously very comparable situations
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2008
Posts: 2449
Posted: #3
too late,like i said Vogel lost the series in game 1.pacers r too young and inexperienced to stay unbeaten at home all play offs long
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2005
Posts: 6840
Posted: #4
pacers vs spurs in finals. Pacers win in 6.  Mark it 
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2008
Posts: 2449
Posted: #5

Quote Originally Posted by mattbrot:

pacers vs spurs in finals. Pacers win in 6.  Mark it 

i'd love to see but its not gonna happen

 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2011
Posts: 907
Posted: #6
look these stats related to hibbert when he is on and off the court
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2005
Posts: 6840
Posted: #7
Quote Originally Posted by bogaty:

i'd love to see but its not gonna happen


you thinkin pacers in 5?
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2006
Posts: 3757
Posted: #8
2.2 seconds is more relevant. Decision making is more tight. If Hibbert wad in LBJ would probably go for the pull up instead.

 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2008
Posts: 2449
Posted: #9
Quote Originally Posted by mattbrot:


you thinkin pacers in 5?

miami in 6 or 7,dont be a fool.there is no way pacers r going to win 3 games at home and remain unbeatable at home,not against the heat.dont forget that miami is unbeaten away in the postseason as well as pacers at home.pacers blew the series in game 1 if u want some more arguments check out whats happened to the celtics last year

 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2009
Posts: 672
Posted: #10
Game 1 came down to a bad defensive decision by Paul George and an awful overplay..He has to force LBJ to shoot a jumper there making Hibbert irrelevant and making Vogel's decision the right one
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2005
Posts: 6840
Posted: #11
Quote Originally Posted by bogaty:

miami in 6 or 7,dont be a fool.there is no way pacers r going to win 3 games at home and remain unbeatable at home,not against the heat.dont forget that miami is unbeaten away in the postseason as well as pacers at home.pacers blew the series in game 1 if u want some more arguments check out whats happened to the celtics last year


sorry Maybe I was not clear. I think that Pacers will beat the heat in 6 and then beat the spurs in 5. "pacers in 5" is referring to the finals.

What do you think?
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2008
Posts: 2449
Posted: #12

Quote Originally Posted by steinline:

Game 1 came down to a bad defensive decision by Paul George and an awful overplay..He has to force LBJ to shoot a jumper there making Hibbert irrelevant and making Vogel's decision the right one

aint no body in the nba that can force lebron to do this or that.wouldnt count on george to be the first one so u better stick to hockey or baseball

 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2008
Posts: 2449
Posted: #13
Quote Originally Posted by mattbrot:


sorry Maybe I was not clear. I think that Pacers will beat the heat in 6 and then beat the spurs in 5. "pacers in 5" is referring to the finals.

What do you think?

i think u should put away drugs and stop gambling for ur own sake

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2006
Posts: 3757
Posted: #14
PG overplayed. But thats why ypu have your best rim defender there so even of LBJ blows by his man, there is still help.

Thats basic shi t rite there.
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2009
Posts: 672
Posted: #15
@bogaty
U do realize there were 2 seconds left..basically if George doesn't overplay him LBJ has time for 1 or 2 dribbles and an 18 footer..thanks for trying tho
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2008
Posts: 2449
Posted: #16

Quote Originally Posted by steinline:

@bogaty
U do realize there were 2 seconds left..basically if George doesn't overplay him LBJ has time for 1 or 2 dribbles and an 18 footer..thanks for trying tho

and the worst thing u can do with 2 sec left is allowing ur opponent to make an uncontested lay up.isnt it?no worse scenario available.

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2006
Posts: 3757
Posted: #17
Steilen answer me this. What is the purpose of taking Hibbert out then? You NEVER take out your best defenders in last seconds.

Hibbert is insurance. IF LEBRON WAS ABLE TO GET PASS HIS INITIAL DEFENDER (WHICH
HE DID) YOU STILL HABE YOUR BEST RIM GUY THAT COULD MAKE LBJ THINK ABOUT PULLING UP INSTEAD OF AN EASY UNCONTESTED LAYUP.

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2006
Posts: 3757
Posted: #18
Nice try tho.
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2013
Posts: 807
Posted: #19
Quote Originally Posted by mattbrot:


sorry Maybe I was not clear. I think that Pacers will beat the heat in 6 and then beat the spurs in 5. "pacers in 5" is referring to the finals.

What do you think?


HAHA 
That made my day lol
 
MVP
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2009
Posts: 16153
Posted: #20
I remember the celtics last year. The celts hjad heat beat and the refs blew the call when wade smacked rondo that woulda closes out series. If it werent or
Refs last year celts beat heat. Thats the only thing im worried about. Will
The nba allow the heat to lose and have a small market face another small
Market in finals
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2010
Posts: 4384
Posted: #21

Pacers in 7 games mark it
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2008
Posts: 13652
Posted: #22
Quote Originally Posted by mattbrot:


you thinkin pacers in 5?


Pacers in 5 would be more likely than 6. I'm a Spurs fan and San Antonio would have home court advantage. Which would be the 2-3-2 format.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2009
Posts: 3746
Posted: #23
Quote Originally Posted by steinline:

2.2 seconds vs 17 seconds..lol obviously very comparable situations
hibbert wasn't in on the second to last possession when LBJ had a layup.  Comparable situations!!!!!  post is correct.  hibbert's gotta be in the game to protect the rim.  george also stayed  in front of labron on that last possession in game two.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2009
Posts: 3746
Posted: #24
Quote Originally Posted by KobezKing:

I remember the celtics last year. The celts hjad heat beat and the refs blew the call when wade smacked rondo that woulda closes out series. If it werent or
Refs last year celts beat heat. Thats the only thing im worried about. Will
The nba allow the heat to lose and have a small market face another small
Market in finals
this is a veteran heat team.  yes, i want pacers to win.  spoelstra, the kid genius, gets to coach labron james at 28 years old and in his prime.
 
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2012
Posts: 695
Posted: #25
lol love the nicknames about lebron... buncha haters..... pretty sure if he was on your fav team youd be on his D... thats a guarantee
All Forums | NBA Betting Forum
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming
Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Office Pools
The Covers community has
810,221
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 30 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service youtube logo facebook logo twitter logo instagram logo linkedin logo google news logo
Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2026 CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.