This play is all about value. So the Heat lost the last time these teams met in humiliating fashion only scoring 11 points in the third quarter to fall to Orlando 89-102. Interestingly enough, the Heat shot better (47.2%-42.1%), had more points in the paint (40-30) and had more fast break points (16-5). The difference was in rebounding. Orlando won the total rebounding batting 48-38 lead by a 24 rebounding night by Superman. They also had 17 offensive rebounds affording them an extra 7 more shots than Miami. When you can take 7 more shots than your opponent with second chance points, it doesn't matter how well you shoot. Offensive rebounding is huge in this league (determines 20-25% the outcome of a game). I don't expect that to change today. Miami just has nobody to guard Dwight. They don't have the size in the paint to compete with his enormous body. Using my new home/away relative point spread rankings: Miami's home PSR is +6.2 and Orlando's away PSR is +2.1. Take the difference and you find Miami should be -4.1 at home today. Neither team has any major injuries to speak of so let's look at scheduling. I've already addressed that Miami is in a revenge spot, but is revenge worth 5.4 points? I don't think so. To make things even better for Magic backers, this is the first home game for Miami after a 6 game road trip where they won 5-1 (covering 5 in a row since losing to Orlando). Their recent success has generated even more value on this line but the opposite should be true: teams playing their first game home after a long road trip often come out a little "flat". As the public gobbles up a hot Miami team looking for revenge, I'll take advantage of the value they're creating and back the dog.
0
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
'10-11 NBA: 90-67 (57.3%) +19.90u
'10-11 NBA-P: 30-16 (65.2%) +18.25u
'10-11 NCAAB: 8-1 (88.9%) +7.90u
'10-11 NHL-P: 11-4 (73.3%) +7.00u
'10-11 MLB: 97-66 (59.8%) +31.61u
'10-11 MLB-P: 9-3 (75.0%) +9.22u
'11-12 NCAAF: 16-21 (43.2%) -7.40u
'11-12 NCAAF-P: 9-6 (60.0%) +1.65u
'11-12 NFL: 42-35-1 (54.5%) +5.05u
'11-12 NFL-P: 5-5 (50.0%)-0.40u
'11-12 NCAAB: 7-2 (77.8%) +4.80u
'11-12 NBA: 44-39-1 (53.1%)+2.62u
3:05 EST - Orlando Magic 9.5 (-110)
This play is all about value. So the Heat lost the last time these teams met in humiliating fashion only scoring 11 points in the third quarter to fall to Orlando 89-102. Interestingly enough, the Heat shot better (47.2%-42.1%), had more points in the paint (40-30) and had more fast break points (16-5). The difference was in rebounding. Orlando won the total rebounding batting 48-38 lead by a 24 rebounding night by Superman. They also had 17 offensive rebounds affording them an extra 7 more shots than Miami. When you can take 7 more shots than your opponent with second chance points, it doesn't matter how well you shoot. Offensive rebounding is huge in this league (determines 20-25% the outcome of a game). I don't expect that to change today. Miami just has nobody to guard Dwight. They don't have the size in the paint to compete with his enormous body. Using my new home/away relative point spread rankings: Miami's home PSR is +6.2 and Orlando's away PSR is +2.1. Take the difference and you find Miami should be -4.1 at home today. Neither team has any major injuries to speak of so let's look at scheduling. I've already addressed that Miami is in a revenge spot, but is revenge worth 5.4 points? I don't think so. To make things even better for Magic backers, this is the first home game for Miami after a 6 game road trip where they won 5-1 (covering 5 in a row since losing to Orlando). Their recent success has generated even more value on this line but the opposite should be true: teams playing their first game home after a long road trip often come out a little "flat". As the public gobbles up a hot Miami team looking for revenge, I'll take advantage of the value they're creating and back the dog.
I don't understand this line at all. Sacramento is still the worst team at defending the rim allowing opponents to shoot 70% at this spot. Cleveland lives at the rim attempting 27.7 shots per game there (2nd most in the league behind Denver). Cleveland also dominates the offensive glass. Their ORR differential of 3.91 is second best in the NBA compared to Sacramento's -0.39 which is slightly below average. Cleveland is rested playing in the middle of a long home stand and Sacramento is playing their 4th road game of a 6 game trip. According to my relative point spread rankings, Sacramento has a neutral PSR of -3.7 and Cleveland is at -0.4. So on a neutral court Cleveland should be -3.3. With home court and intangibles factored in this line should be somewhere in the -7 point range. For the sake of falling for a short line on the home team that looks almost too easy to take, I'll fade the 5th worst team in the league on the road and back Cleveland at only -2.5.
0
6:05 EST - Cleveland Cavaliers -2.5 (-110)
I don't understand this line at all. Sacramento is still the worst team at defending the rim allowing opponents to shoot 70% at this spot. Cleveland lives at the rim attempting 27.7 shots per game there (2nd most in the league behind Denver). Cleveland also dominates the offensive glass. Their ORR differential of 3.91 is second best in the NBA compared to Sacramento's -0.39 which is slightly below average. Cleveland is rested playing in the middle of a long home stand and Sacramento is playing their 4th road game of a 6 game trip. According to my relative point spread rankings, Sacramento has a neutral PSR of -3.7 and Cleveland is at -0.4. So on a neutral court Cleveland should be -3.3. With home court and intangibles factored in this line should be somewhere in the -7 point range. For the sake of falling for a short line on the home team that looks almost too easy to take, I'll fade the 5th worst team in the league on the road and back Cleveland at only -2.5.
@gomburzago you're right, his size and defensive intensity is impossible to replace with Cleveland's current roster. However, I don't think he's worth 4.5 points on the line. They're still the better team playing at home. Setting Sacramento at only -2.5 suggests they're better than Cleveland. With or without Varejao, that's just not true. The line is off and I'll take my chances even though it smells fishy.
0
@gomburzago you're right, his size and defensive intensity is impossible to replace with Cleveland's current roster. However, I don't think he's worth 4.5 points on the line. They're still the better team playing at home. Setting Sacramento at only -2.5 suggests they're better than Cleveland. With or without Varejao, that's just not true. The line is off and I'll take my chances even though it smells fishy.
I think the line is short on Cleveland because Sacramento is 8-3 ATS in their last 11. Cleveland also doesn't draw a lot of public action so their spreads typically have a point or so of inherent value. If I drew up on the line for this game it would have been Cleveland -4.5 (even at this number I would have taken Cleveland). Public perception has driven it down to where it stands right now.
0
I think the line is short on Cleveland because Sacramento is 8-3 ATS in their last 11. Cleveland also doesn't draw a lot of public action so their spreads typically have a point or so of inherent value. If I drew up on the line for this game it would have been Cleveland -4.5 (even at this number I would have taken Cleveland). Public perception has driven it down to where it stands right now.
Thank you ESPN for this incredibly generous line. The Mavericks are head and shoulders better than New York. If this game was played two weeks ago, Dallas would have been -4.5 or higher. The line opened at -2 and its obvious to me that sharps jumped on it immediately sending it a half point higher. The Mavericks have hit their stride and should continue to roll today. New York hasn't shown me that they can compete with any of the elite teams especially ones with great defenses like Dallas. I don't care how fired up MSG is going to be today - the Mavs are a veteran team and can take it. Melo will be out again. Where is the scoring going to come from? The Turnover Mach-Lin? Amare The Black Hole Stoudomire? Yeah good luck.. Dallas wins 96-85
0
*** Added Play ***
1:05 EST - Dallas Mavericks -2.5 (-110)
Thank you ESPN for this incredibly generous line. The Mavericks are head and shoulders better than New York. If this game was played two weeks ago, Dallas would have been -4.5 or higher. The line opened at -2 and its obvious to me that sharps jumped on it immediately sending it a half point higher. The Mavericks have hit their stride and should continue to roll today. New York hasn't shown me that they can compete with any of the elite teams especially ones with great defenses like Dallas. I don't care how fired up MSG is going to be today - the Mavs are a veteran team and can take it. Melo will be out again. Where is the scoring going to come from? The Turnover Mach-Lin? Amare The Black Hole Stoudomire? Yeah good luck.. Dallas wins 96-85
Thank you ESPN for this incredibly generous line. The Mavericks are head and shoulders better than New York. If this game was played two weeks ago, Dallas would have been -4.5 or higher. The line opened at -2 and its obvious to me that sharps jumped on it immediately sending it a half point higher. The Mavericks have hit their stride and should continue to roll today. New York hasn't shown me that they can compete with any of the elite teams especially ones with great defenses like Dallas. I don't care how fired up MSG is going to be today - the Mavs are a veteran team and can take it. Melo will be out again. Where is the scoring going to come from? The Turnover Mach-Lin? Amare The Black Hole Stoudomire? Yeah good luck.. Dallas wins 96-85
Hey Si1ly --
Dont post much but wanted to say thank you for your work and your relative point system as well. I get that NY as overvalued due to a lot of public perception, partivcualry given that this is a weekend game and a lot more "public bettors" are around. But I took a look at your point system and it seems the line is pretty fair --> are you making this play based more on Dallas's recent play? I took them at -2 early based on their defense and game at Philly. Just wanted to hear your thoughts
0
Quote Originally Posted by si1ly:
*** Added Play ***
1:05 EST - Dallas Mavericks -2.5 (-110)
Thank you ESPN for this incredibly generous line. The Mavericks are head and shoulders better than New York. If this game was played two weeks ago, Dallas would have been -4.5 or higher. The line opened at -2 and its obvious to me that sharps jumped on it immediately sending it a half point higher. The Mavericks have hit their stride and should continue to roll today. New York hasn't shown me that they can compete with any of the elite teams especially ones with great defenses like Dallas. I don't care how fired up MSG is going to be today - the Mavs are a veteran team and can take it. Melo will be out again. Where is the scoring going to come from? The Turnover Mach-Lin? Amare The Black Hole Stoudomire? Yeah good luck.. Dallas wins 96-85
Hey Si1ly --
Dont post much but wanted to say thank you for your work and your relative point system as well. I get that NY as overvalued due to a lot of public perception, partivcualry given that this is a weekend game and a lot more "public bettors" are around. But I took a look at your point system and it seems the line is pretty fair --> are you making this play based more on Dallas's recent play? I took them at -2 early based on their defense and game at Philly. Just wanted to hear your thoughts
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.