Idiot Bulls fans. You got nothing. First win in ATL tomorrow night before talking smack.
No, I think the Bulls might very well lose tomorrow and win in 7. In a weird way I'm almost hoping for it if it results in a better line for this next series.
0
Quote Originally Posted by UMF:
Idiot Bulls fans. You got nothing. First win in ATL tomorrow night before talking smack.
No, I think the Bulls might very well lose tomorrow and win in 7. In a weird way I'm almost hoping for it if it results in a better line for this next series.
Both LeBron and Wade couldn't get past the demon (Celtics) in the past few years.. they finally did it..
I think the Heat won't have a problem with the Bulls as they only have to worry about Rose. The rest of the Bulls haven't really shown up (Boozer) for the playoffs.
0
Both LeBron and Wade couldn't get past the demon (Celtics) in the past few years.. they finally did it..
I think the Heat won't have a problem with the Bulls as they only have to worry about Rose. The rest of the Bulls haven't really shown up (Boozer) for the playoffs.
if the LAL proved anything this year, it's that whatever bad habits you continually performed during the year, they come back to haunt you in the playoffs.
LAL had many areas they were deficient in during the course of this year , but because they played inferior teams most of the time, their talent & depth was able to gloss over the problems with team chemistry ....
they did have quite a few logic defying losses at home , with a few double digit embarassments.....
but when the real pressure came vs DAL , those shitty habits that didn't hurt them in the reg season , really bit them in the ass in the playoffs.
MIA's pattern all year was:
beat up on the shitty < .500 sides, but struggle vs the > .500 teams,..especially on the road....and many 4Q's where their offense looked stagnant
CHI's pattern most of the year was: - suffocating defense, a great home record, and the best record in the NBA (along with SAN )
MIA eventually ended up getting the better of BOS this year,.but that was partly due to BOS fucking themselves with the mid season trade of Perkins, which totally fucked the chemistry of BOS for the remainder of the year.
it's pretty obvious if you look BOS's record pre All star break & post All star break, that they contributed to their own demise , and that helped MIA.
No doubt Perkins would have been a big help defensively in the last 6 mins of each of the playoff games BOS lost.
CHI has lost a few games vs ATL , which i think is a case of CHI taking ATL a little lightly , and turning up less motivated
i think vs MIA , CHI won't have the luxury of being able to turn up 1 game , and disappear the next..they'll need to be switched on for every game....but i know CHI weren't overawed playing MIA during the reg season.
sure, CHI have to get through ATL first, and there is some chance ATL could win games 6 & 7...but seeing as MIA closed out today, CHI will be more motivated to win G6 in ATL , so they have a similar break leading into the EC finals as MIA.
anyone who thinks CHI will be easybeats , especially with CHI having HCA , enjoy taking under the odds on MIA
0
if the LAL proved anything this year, it's that whatever bad habits you continually performed during the year, they come back to haunt you in the playoffs.
LAL had many areas they were deficient in during the course of this year , but because they played inferior teams most of the time, their talent & depth was able to gloss over the problems with team chemistry ....
they did have quite a few logic defying losses at home , with a few double digit embarassments.....
but when the real pressure came vs DAL , those shitty habits that didn't hurt them in the reg season , really bit them in the ass in the playoffs.
MIA's pattern all year was:
beat up on the shitty < .500 sides, but struggle vs the > .500 teams,..especially on the road....and many 4Q's where their offense looked stagnant
CHI's pattern most of the year was: - suffocating defense, a great home record, and the best record in the NBA (along with SAN )
MIA eventually ended up getting the better of BOS this year,.but that was partly due to BOS fucking themselves with the mid season trade of Perkins, which totally fucked the chemistry of BOS for the remainder of the year.
it's pretty obvious if you look BOS's record pre All star break & post All star break, that they contributed to their own demise , and that helped MIA.
No doubt Perkins would have been a big help defensively in the last 6 mins of each of the playoff games BOS lost.
CHI has lost a few games vs ATL , which i think is a case of CHI taking ATL a little lightly , and turning up less motivated
i think vs MIA , CHI won't have the luxury of being able to turn up 1 game , and disappear the next..they'll need to be switched on for every game....but i know CHI weren't overawed playing MIA during the reg season.
sure, CHI have to get through ATL first, and there is some chance ATL could win games 6 & 7...but seeing as MIA closed out today, CHI will be more motivated to win G6 in ATL , so they have a similar break leading into the EC finals as MIA.
anyone who thinks CHI will be easybeats , especially with CHI having HCA , enjoy taking under the odds on MIA
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.